C
S. Usami et al.
Letter
Synlett
Table 3 Reaction of Acylating Agent 3 with Grignard Reagents
O
N
O
1) R–MgBr, 1.0 equiv, THF
2) NH4Cl aq
OtBu
OtBu
R
S
3
9a,c–e
Entry
RMgBr
Temp (°C)
Time
Product
Yield (%)
Recovery of 3 (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
PhMgBr (6a)
r.t.
20 h
19 h
27 h
4 h
9a
9a
9e
9e
9c
9c
9d
9d
21
61
78
79
18
62
–
44
–
50 °C
r.t.
Ph(CH2)2MgBr (6e)
(E)-PhCH=CHMgBr (6c)
MeC≡CMgBr (6d)
14
–
50 °C
r.t.
17 h
9 h
57
–
50 °C
r.t.
1 week
2 days
46
–
50 °C
quant
Thus, the yields of esters 9a and 9c–e at room temperature
were strongly associated with the s character of the Gri-
gnard reagent 6, and the yield of 9e (78%) was much higher
than that of 9a (21%), 9c (18%), or 9d (0%) (Table 3, entries 1,
3, 5, and 7). Gentle heating improved the yields of the ester
products 9 (entries 2, 4, 6, and 8); in particular, 9d was ob-
tained in quantitative yield (entry 8).
Finally, two more reactions were conducted to illustrate
the scope of the reaction (Scheme 3). Thus, the reaction of
thiocarbonate 1 with the bulky reagent cyclohexylmagne-
sium bromide (6f), at 50 °C gave benzyl cyclohexanecarbox-
ylate (4f) in 71% yield. A sterically less-hindered acylating
agent could also be used: acylating agent 2 reacted with ar-
omatic Grignard reagent 6g at 50 °C without any difficulty
to afford methyl 4-tert-butylbenzoate (10) in 95% yield.
Supporting Information
Supporting information for this article is available online at
S
u
p
p
orit
n
gInformati
o
n
S
u
p
p
orit
n
gInformati
o
n
References and Notes
(1) (a) March’s Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions, Mechanism,
and Structure (6th ed.); Smith, M. B.; March, J., Ed.; Wiley-Inter-
science: Hoboken, 2007, Chap. 16 1445. (b) Moyer, W. W.;
Marvel, C. S. Org. Synth. Col. Vol II; Wiley: London, 1931, 602.
(2) A dry carbon dioxide equivalent of the Grignard reaction has
recently been reported; see: (a) Inagaki, F.; Matsumoto, C.;
Iwata, T.; Mukai, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2017, 139, 4639. More
recently, sodium methyl carbonate was found to react with Gri-
gnard reagents to afford carboxylic acids; see: (b) Hurst, T. E.;
Deichert, J. A.; Kapeniak, L.; Lee, R.; Harris, J.; Jessop, P. G.;
Snieckus, V. Org. Lett. 2019, 21, 3882.
1) 50 °C
THF
MgBr
CO2Bn
N
O
(3) Maeda, H.; Takahashi, K.; Ohmori, H. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
12233.
(4) Kashima, C.; Tsuruoka, S.; Mizuhara, S. Tetrahedron 1998, 54,
14679.
S
OBn
2) NH4Cl aq
4f (71%)
1
6f (1 equiv)
(5) Werner, T.; Barrett, A. G. M. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4302.
(6) For Grignard reagent complexes chelated with TDA-1, see:
Boudin, A.; Cerveau, G.; Chuit, C.; Corriu, R. J. P.; Reye, C. Tetra-
hedron 1989, 45, 171.
(7) Bottalico, D.; Fiandanese, V.; Marchese, G.; Punzi, A. Synlett
2007, 974.
1) 50 °C
THF
MgBr
CO2Me
N
O
S
OMe
2) NH4Cl aq
6g (1 equiv)
10 (95%)
2
Scheme 3 Illustrative scope of the alkoxycarbonylation of Grignard re-
(8) For Mukaiyama’s 2-pyridyl thioesters, see: Mukaiyama, T.;
Araki, M.; Takei, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 4763.
(9) For Weinreb amides, see: (a) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815. For a review of the synthetic utility of
Weinreb amides, see: (b) Balasubramaniam, S.; Aidhen, I. S. Syn-
thesis 2008, 3707.
agents
In conclusion, we have discovered a novel one-carbon
homologation reaction of Grignard reagents via chelated in-
termediates. This method provides an alternative to con-
ventional transformations of Grignard reagents into esters.
(10) The use of dialkyl alkoxycarbonylphosphonates might be classi-
fied into this category: see ref. 3.
(11) (a) Kim, S.; Lee, J. I.; Yi, K. Y. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 3570.
(b) Lee, J. I.; Jung, H. J. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2005, 49, 609.
Funding Information
This work was supported by JSPSKAKENHI Grant Number 17K0821
(O.T.).
J
a
p
a
n
S
o
c
i
etyforth
e
Pro
m
oti
o
n
of
S
c
i
e
n
c
e
(1
7
K
0
8
2
2
1)
© 2019. Thieme. All rights reserved. — Synlett 2019, 30, A–D