block the elimination pathway.6 Alternatively, 3-hydroxyaze-
tidines have been prepared from an amine and epichlorohydrin,
and the alcohol functionality can serve as a handle for further
elaboration.7 Despite the usefulness of these methods, no general
one-pot method exists for the preparation of 1,3-disubstituted
azetidines starting from 2-substituted-1,3-propanediols.
A One-Pot Preparation of 1,3-Disubstituted
Azetidines
Michael C. Hillier*,† and Cheng-yi Chen
Department of Process Research, Merck & Co., P.O. Box 2000,
Rahway, New Jersey 07065
SCHEME 1. Azetidine Formation via Bis-Tosylate
Displacement: Methyl versus tert-Butyl
ReceiVed June 5, 2006
A straightforward synthesis of 1,3-disubstituted azetidines
has been accomplished via the alkylation of a primary amine
with the bis-triflate of a 2-substituted-1,3-propanediol species.
This transformation is carried out in one reaction vessel, and
elimination of the alkylating reagent is generally not a major
byproduct. The scope of this methodology has been inves-
tigated using a variety 2-substituted-1,3-propanediols and
amine nucleophiles.
SCHEME 2. Azetidine Formation via Bis-Triflate
Activation
Substituted azetidines are unique heterocycles that can be
found in a number of biologically relevant compounds.1 Many
synthetic methods have been developed for the preparation of
these moieties, often involving the alkylation of an amine with
an activated three-carbon unit.2 For example, unsubstituted
N-alkyl azetidines can be assembled via intramolecular cycliza-
tion of activated amino propanols or by the double alkylation
of a primary amine using 1,3-diactivated propane reagents.3
3-Substituted azetidines can be obtained in similar fashion from
2-substituted-1,3-propanediol derivatives and amine nucleo-
philes.4 However, in some of these examples, elimination of
the alkylating reagent has been observed as a major reaction
byproduct.4c,5 One solution to this problem has been to use a
2,2-disubstituted-1,3-propanediol starting material in order to
As part of our own program of research,8 we became
interested in the synthesis of 3-(1-phenylethyl)azetidines 3 from
the corresponding diols 1 via the intermediate bis-tosylates 2
(Scheme 1). After screening a variety of bases and solvents,
the activated species 2a (1.5 equiv) was found to react slowly
with aminodiphenylmethane (1 equiv) in the presence of
NaHCO3 (3 equiv) in DMPU at 80 °C to give 3a (R ) Me) in
70% yield after 24 h. When the same conditions were applied
to the more sterically hindered substrate 2b, the desired azetidine
product 3b (R ) tBu) was formed in only 20% yield, even after
heating at 80 °C in a sealed vessel.9 We postulate that the greater
steric bulk of the starting material 2b inhibits alkylation of the
amine and subsequent cyclization. In light of this result, other
approaches to the azetidine 3b were examined, and a one-pot
method developed by Miller and co-workers6 using trifluo-
romethanesulfonic anhydride (Tf2O) as the activator (Scheme
2) was identified. Following this procedure, the diol 1b (1.05
equiv) was treated with Tf2O (2.2 equiv) in the presence of
† Current address: Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL 60064.
(1) (a) Frigola, J.; Pare´s, J.; Corbera, J.; Van˜o´ Merce`, R.; Torrens, A.;
Ma´s, J.; Valent´ı, E. J. Med. Chem. 1993, 36, 801. (b) Pinder, A. R. Nat.
Prod. Rep. 1992, 9, 491.
(2) (a) Cromwell, N. H.; Phillips, B. Chem. ReV. 1979, 79, 331. (b) De
Kimpe, N. In ComprehensiVe Heterocyclic Chemistry II; Padwa, A., Ed.;
Pergamon: Tarrytown, New York, 1996; pp 507.
(3) (a) Szmuszkovicz, J.; Kane, M. P.; Laurian, L. G.; Chidester, C. G.;
Scahill, T. A. J. Org. Chem. 1981, 46, 3562. (b) Sammes, P. G.; Smith, S.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1984, 2415. (c) Singh, P.; Jain, A. Ind. J.
Chem. 1988, 27B, 790. (d) Huszthy, P.; Bradshaw, J. S.; Krakowiak, K. F.;
Wang, T.; Dalley, N. K. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1993, 30, 1197. (e) Zhao,
D.; Chen, C.; Xu, F.; Tan, L.; Tillyer, R.; Pierce, M. E.; Moore, J. R. In
Organic Reactions; Hart, D. J., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2000;
pp 12-21. (f) Haight, A. R.; Lallaman, J. E.; Wayne, G. S. U.S. Patent 6
124 474, 2000.
(4) (a) Gaj, B. J.; Moore, D. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 23, 2155. (b)
Higgins, R. H.; Eaton, Q. L.; Worth, L.; Peterson, M. V. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 1987, 24, 255. (c) Juaristi, E.; Madrigal, D. Tetrahedron 1989, 45,
629. (d) Chong, J. M.; Sokoll, K. K. Synth. Commun. 1995, 25, 603.
(5) (a) Anderson, A. G.; Lok, R. J. J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37, 3953. (b)
Cromwell, N. H.; Soriano, D. S.; Doomes, E. J. Org. Chem. 1980, 45, 4983.
(c) Nozoe, T.; Shindo, K.; Wakabayashi, H.; Kurihara, T.; Ishikawa, S.
Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 1991, 56, 991. (d) Saulnier, M. G.;
Zimmermann, K.; Struzynski, C. P.; Sang, X.; Velaparthi, U.; Wittman,
M.; Frennesson, D. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 397.
(6) Miller, R. A.; Lang, F.; Marcune, B.; Zewge, D.; Song, Z. J.; Karady,
S. Synth. Commun. 2003, 33, 3347.
(7) (a) Carruthers, N. I.; Wong, S.; Chan, T. J. Chem. Res., Synop. 1996,
430. (b) Billotte, S. Synlett 1998, 379. (c) Vuilhorgne, M.; Commerc¸on,
A.; Mignani, S. Chem. Lett. 1999, 605. (d) Dejaegher, Y.; Kuz´menok, N.
M.; Zvonok, A. M.; DeKimpe, N. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 29.
10.1021/jo061147x CCC: $33.50 © 2006 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 09/07/2006
J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7885-7887
7885