trying to design molecules for which the thermal reisomerism is
slower as compared to those reported herein, by incorporating
some strain parameters. Our strategy may find use in the
development of anticancer molecules involving photodynamic
therapy.13
MK is grateful to CSIR, Government of India for a senior
research fellowship. AB thanks DST, Government of India for a
research grant.
Fig. 2 (a) DNA cleavage experiment of compounds 1 & 3 after 1.5 h
incubation at 37 uC; lane 1: control DNA in TAE buffer (pH 8.5,
0.4 mm per bp) (7 ml) + CH3CN (10 ml); lane 2: DNA in TAE buffer
(pH 8.5, 0.4 mm per bp) (7 ml) + Z-sulfone (0.02 mM, 2.5 h) in CH3CN
(5 ml); lane 3: DNA in TAE buffer (pH 8.5, 0.4 mm per bp) (7 ml) +
E-sulfone (0.02 mM, 2.5 h) in CH3CN (5 ml). (b) DNA cleavage
experiment of compounds 2 & 4 after 2.5 h incubation at 20 uC; lane 1:
control DNA in TAE buffer (pH 8.5, 0.4 mm per bp) (7 ml) + CH3CN
(10 ml) at; lane 2: DNA in TAE buffer (pH 8.5, 0.4 mm per bp) (7 ml) +
E-sulfone (0.02 mM, 2.5 h) in CH3CN (5 ml) at; lane 3: DNA in TAE
buffer (pH 8.5, 0.4 mm per bp) (7 ml) + Z-sulfone (0.02 mM, 2.5 h) in
CH3CN (5 ml).
Notes and references
1 K. C. Nicolaou, S. Wendeborn, P. Maligres, K. Isshiki, N. Zein and
G. Ellestad, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1991, 30, 418.
2 (a) A. M. Maxam and W. Gilbert, Methods Enzymol., 1980, 65, 499; (b)
A. M. Maxam and W. Gilbert, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 1977, 74,
560.
3 (a) P. J. Garratt and S. B. Neoh, J. Org. Chem., 1979, 44, 2667; (b)
Y. S. P. Cheng, P. J. Garratt, S. B. Neoh and V. H. Rumjanek, Isr. J.
Chem., 1985, 26, 101; (c) S. Braverman, Y. Duar and D. Segev,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1979, 3181.
4 (a) Y.-j. Xu, M. S. DeMott, J. T. Hwang, M. M. Greenberg and
B. Demple, DNA Repair, 2003, 2, 175; (b) A. Liptakova, L. Svorenova,
J. Labuda and Z. Durackova, Conf. Coord. Chem., 1995, 407; (c)
C. Richter, J. W. Park and B. N. Ames, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.,
1988, 85, 6465.
5 A. Basak and U. K. Khamrai, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 7913.
6 (a) S. M. Kerwin, Tetrahedron Lett., 1994, 35, 1023; (b) W.-M. Dai and
K. C. Fong, Tetrahedron Lett., 1995, 36, 5613; (c) W.-M. Dai,
K. C. Fong, H. Danjo, S.-i. Nishimoto, M. Solow, W. L. Mak and
M. L. Yeung, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1996, 6, 1093; (d) K.-i. Haruna,
H. Kanezaki, K. Tanabe, W.-M. Dai and S.-i. Nishimoto, Bioorg. Med.
Chem., 2006, 14, 4427; (e) K.-i. Haruna, K. Tanabe, A. Ishii, W.-M. Dai,
H. Hatta and S.-i. Nishimoto, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2003, 11, 5311.
7 M. Kar, A. Basak and M. Bhattacharya, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.,
2005, 15, 5392.
sulfone appeared as an AB quartet reflecting their diastereotopic
nature due to the chirality of the allene. The Z-isomer on the other
hand when similarly treated first showed the formation of the
monoallene. But within a few minutes (y5 min) the signals
corresponding to monoallene disappeared and some unassignable
peaks of very small intensity appeared in the olefinic region.
Carrying out the reaction in the presence of MeOH (12 h, 37 uC)
showed the formation of both mono and bis adduct with MeOH
(appearance of peaks in the mass spectra at m/z 413 and 445). This
indicated that the monoallene from the Z-isomer got converted
into the bis allene which then rapidly decomposed (possibly via
Garratt–Braverman rearrangement in the absence of MeOH).11
Thus, there is a distinct change in reactivity between the E-and the
Z-isomer.
8 (a) R. G. Jones and R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1972, 94, 660;
(b) R. G. Bergman, Acc. Chem. Res., 1973, 6, 25; (c) T. P. Lockhart and
R. G. Bergman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1981, 103, 4091.
9 D. B. Dess and J. C. Martin, J. Org. Soc., 1983, 48, 4155.
10 Selected spectral data (all 1H and 13C NMR were recorded at 200 and
50 MHz, respectively, in CDCl3 unless mentioned otherwise). For 1: dH
7.72 (1H, dd, J = 1.5 Hz, 8.5 Hz), 7.45 (2H, dt , J = 1.8, 7.5 Hz), 7.21
(4H, m), 4.93 (4H, s), 3.75 (4H, s); dC 154, 145, 131.9, 123.4, 119.6, 119,
83, 74, 60.3, 43.3; HRMS calcd for C20H16N2O4S + H+ 381.09101
found 381.0874. For 2: dH 7.70 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 7.42 (2H, m), 7.12
(5H, m), 6.30 (1H, d, J = 16 Hz), 6.10 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 4.98 (2H, s),
4.65 (2H, d, J = 5.0 Hz), 4.03 (4H, s); HRMS calcd for C22H18N2O4S +
H+ 407.1067 found 407.1096. For 3: dH 7.72 (1H, d, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.45
(1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.25 (2H, m), 7.06 (2H, m), 6.84 (2H, d, J = 8.24 Hz),
4.59 (4H, s), 3.96 (4H, s); HRMS calcd for C20H16N2O4S + H+ 381.0910
found 381.0880. For 4: dH 7.69 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz), 7.4 (3H, m), 6.9 (4H,
m), 6.31 (1H, dt, J = 2 Hz, 16 Hz), 6.11 (1H, d, J = 16 Hz), 4.90 (2H,
bs), 4.76 (2H, bs), 4.10 (4H, bs); HRMS calcd for C22H18N2O4S + H+
407.1067 found 407.1087.
11 Braverman has recently reported that the rearrangement to the
thiophene dioxides is more facile by incorporating additional conjuga-
tion to the propargyl system. For the reference see Y. Zafrani,
H. E. Gottlieb, M. Sprecher and S. Braverman, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70,
10166. This was the rationale for designing sulfone 2.
12 The cleavage efficiency was approximately 2.5 times for the Z-isomer
than that for the E-isomer. This was determined by checking the relative
UV-absorbance of the bands at 280 nm. It is to be noted that the control
DNA specimen is usually contaminated with some nicked form (form
II).
Since the Z-isomer can isomerize up to the bisallene in the
presence of base, it is expected to show higher DNA-cleavage
efficiency as it can proceed via both an alkylation and an oxidative
diradical pathway. DNA-cleaving experiments were thus carried
out with the pure E isomer and a 1 : 3 mixture of E and Z isomer
(obtained by photoisomerism) at 37 uC using pBR 322 supercoiled
plasmid DNA at pH 8.5. The results showed the higher cleavage
efficiency12 for the Z-isomer (Fig. 2a) as compared to the E-isomer
(lane 3). However, the cleavage efficiency finally evened out as
more time was allowed. This is because of thermal reisomerization
to the E-isomer. To slow down this thermal reiomerization
process, the experiment was repeated at the lower temperature of
20 uC where the difference in cleavage efficiency became more
significant. For the other sulfone, 2, again the E-isomer was found
to be less efficient cleaving agent as compared to the Z-isomer
(Fig. 2b). In this case also, the incubation with DNA was done
with the lower temperature of 20 uC to suppress thermal
isomerization.
In conclusion, we have successfully developed a novel photo-
triggering device involving E to Z isomerism to modulate the
reactivity of azo based bis propargyl sulfones. Currently, we are
13 J. Moan and Q. Peng, Anticancer Res., 2003, 23, 3591.
3820 | Chem. Commun., 2006, 3818–3820
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2006