5666
V. V. Thakur et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 16 (2006) 5664–5667
of 3–10; (3) compounds with a single OMe, SMe, or
NHMe substituent on the heterocycle are particularly
potent, that is, 7–10b, 10d, 10i; (4) the triazenes show lit-
tle cytotoxicity with the exception of the amino, cyano
compounds 8c and 8j; (5) the cyano pyrimidines are
both potent and cytotoxic, though 10b has a safety mar-
gin (CC50/EC50) > 100; and (6) many of the compounds
are highly potent with EC50 values below 20 nM, and
three of the potent triazines (8b, 8h, 8i) also have safety
margins >1000. Understanding of the origins and varia-
tions of the cytotoxicity is lacking. Since it was more
pronounced for the 2-pyrimidines than the 2-thiazoles,
a recognition element associated with the heterocycle
in the present NNRTI series appeared to be operative.
Indeed, this notion is further supported by the favorable
results for the triazenes.
Figure 1. Typical snapshot of 7b bound to HIV-RT from an MC
simulation. Carbon atoms of 7b are gold; from the left, Tyr181,
Tyr188, Phe227, Leu100, Lys101; Trp229 at the top, Val106 at the
bottom. H-bond with Lys101 O on right. Some residues in front
including Glu138 have been removed for clarity. The water on N5 is
also H-bonded to a carboxylate O of Glu138.
Results are also included in Table 1 for three reference
NNRTIs, nevirapine (ViramuneÒ), efavirenz (SustivaÒ),
and TMC125 (etravirine). The present compounds are
considerably more effective against WT HIV-1 than
nevirapine, and the most active ones are in the low
nM-range like efavirenz and TMC125. Of course, phar-
macologically important properties of the NNRTIs are
also relevant,2,3 as discussed further below.
in the FEP calculations, so the positioning of a substitu-
ent, for example, whether it would correspond to R or
R0 in 9 in a complex with RT, was not addressed in de-
tail. In fact, by visualization, energy minimizations, and
even Monte Carlo (MC) simulations in explicit water it
was ambiguous which position would be preferred for
the methoxy group in 9b. MC/FEP calculations were
subsequently performed at 25 °C to address this issue;
they followed standard protocols2,8 including the use
of 178 residues of RT, 1250 (complex) and 2000
(unbound) TIP4P water molecules, the OPLS/CM1A
force field,9 and 14 free-energy windows for each
perturbation.
The results for the alternative choices for the U group in
the pyrimidine series are listed in Table 2. As with the
2-thiazoles for which various heteroarylmethoxy options
for U were tried,3 no choice has emerged superior to
ODMA. Removal of the Z-methyl group of ODMA
to yield the E-buten-2-yl ethers, 11a and 11c, reduces
potency ca. 10-fold. However, the structural analyses
below, including Figure 1, suggest that this change could
be advantageous for increased resilience to the Y181C
variant of HIV-RT. The phenyl ethers 11b and 11d are
ca. 100-fold less potent than the DMA ethers, and only
the m-tolyl analog 11f showed somewhat improved per-
formance. Among the aryl ethers, the thioether 11h was
the most potent, though its EC50 is still 32-fold higher
than that for the DMA ether 9b.
The preferred orientation of a methyl group was ad-
dressed first. To assist in visualization, Figure 1 can be
consulted. The bound inhibitors adopt a right-handed
helical form. The substituent on the heterocycle can
either be directed ‘in’ toward Tyr181 and Tyr188, as
illustrated for 7b, or ‘out’ toward Lys101. During the
simulations, interconversion between ‘in’ and ‘out’ never
occurred. MC/FEP calculations were performed for
Molecular modeling. In the previous study,2 structures
were built for complexes of the 2-thiazoyl and 2-pyri-
midinyl NNRTIs, and they were validated by the good
accord between FEP-computed and observed relative
activities for variation of Het and Y in Het–NH–PhY–
ODMA inhibitors. The heterocycles were unsubstituted
the closed cycle: Me2-9 ! Mein-9 ! H2-9 ! Meout
-
9 ! Me2-9. The hysteresis for the free energies of
binding using this cycle was 0.40 0.25 kcal/mol. Then,
additional MC/FEP calculations were performed to
convert OMe, SMe, and other small substituents to
the methyl analogs, which yielded the relative free ener-
gies of binding in Table 3.
Table 2. Anti-HIV-1 activity (EC50) and cytotoxicity (CC50), lM, for
derivatives of pyrimidine 11a
Compound
R
Y
EC50
CC50
9n
H
H
H
ODMA
(E)-OCH2CH@CHCH3
OPh
0.200
2.3
2.5
31.0
30.0
9.0
There is a very strong preference, 6–10 kcal/mol, for the
Me, OMe, SMe, and OEt groups to be ‘in.’ They project
into the pocket near Ca and Cb of Tyr181 and Tyr188
(Fig. 1). The pocket cannot accommodate substituents
larger than OEt, and there is some reduction in activity
in going from OMe to OEt. Water is not observed in this
region during the MC simulations. Thus, N3 of the
polyazines does not participate in hydrogen bonding in
the complexes. Also, the pocket is formed for the unsub-
stituted cases, so there is no penalty for further cavity
11a
11b
9b
13.0
OMe ODMA
OMe (E)-OCH2CH@CHCH3
OMe OPh
0.010
11c
11d
11e
11f
11g
11h
0.089 17.0
2.5
NA
38.0
13.0
OMe O–o-MePh
OMe O–m-MePh
OMe O–p-MePh
OMe SPh
0.540 18.0
10.0 >100
0.320 21.0
a NA for EC50 > CC50
.