C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
diazeniumdiolate photorelease is not pH-dependent and can be
initiated by long-wavelength (g350 nm) light, making this diaz-
eniumdiolate precursor potentially well-suited for a range of
biological applications.14
Since the rate of NO release from diazeniumdiolate 1 can be
controlled by factors such as the substituents R, pH, and temper-
ature, an additional advantageous feature of 6 (and of the other
derivatives reported here) is that the flux of NO can be controlled
(and varied) by these factors. Figure 1 demonstrates that the NO
release rate observed following photolysis of 6 is exactly analogous
to that observed for thermal dissociation of the sodium salt of 1 (R
) Et) and, moreover, shows the same pH dependence. In addition,
the inset of Figure 1 shows that the rate of NO release following
photolysis at a particular pH can be varied by simply changing the
nature of the released diazeniumdiolate, for example, from a
diethylamine derivative (1 (R ) Et)) to a piperidine derivative
(1 (NR2 ) piperidinyl)).
Figure 1. NO release rates observed following photolysis (Xe-arc lamp
with a 324-nm long pass filter) of 6 (0.5 µM in 99% aqueous acetonitrile
at 25 °C) at varying solution pH’s (in blue) compared with the corresponding
rates observed for the thermal dissociation of the sodium salt of diazeni-
umdiolate 1 (R ) Et) at the same pH’s (in red). The inset shows an
analogous comparison for (a) the photolysis of 10 (in blue) with the thermal
dissociation of 1 (NR2 ) piperidinyl) (in red) and (b) the photolysis of 9
(in blue) with the thermal dissociation of 1 (R ) Et) (in red) at pH 6.8.
Acknowledgment. We gratefully acknowledge the National
Institutes of Health (R01 GM58109) for generous support of this
research. J.P.T. also acknowledges a Camille Dreyfus Teacher-
Scholar Award and an Alfred P. Sloan Research Fellowship. J.A.S.
acknowledges a Jean Dreyfus Boissevain Undergraduate Scholar-
ship. We also thank Professor Jakob Wirz for helpful discussions.
formation of ionic products in photochemical reactions of benzylic
systems.7,11 To determine what substitution patterns might enhance
the photorelease of 1 in naphthylmethyl and naphthylallyl systems,
we examined reported substituent effects on the excited-state acidity
of 1- and 2-naphthols.12 Electron-withdrawing substituents in the
5 and 8 positions and in the 3, 5, and 8 positions for 1- and
2-naphthol, respectively, enhance the excited state acidity. We
reasoned, therefore, that these positions transmit electronic effects
most effectively in the excited states of naphthalene derivatives
and that electron-donating substituents in these positions would
enhance the formation of a naphthylmethyl or naphthylallyl cation,
resulting in the desired photorelease of diazeniumdiolate anion 1
(Path B, Scheme 1).
To test this hypothesis, methoxy-substituted compounds 5-9
were synthesized and, along with the parent compounds 2 and 4,
were analyzed for products following photolysis. Yields of organic
products, quantified by HPLC analysis, are given in Table 1.13
Quantification of NO released upon photolysis was performed as
described previously5 and was used to derive yields of photoreleased
1 (see also Supporting Information).
The diazeniumdiolate yields presented in Table 1 indicate that
the appropriate methoxy group substitution pattern has a significant
effect on the efficiency of the photorelease of 1, for example, 2
(1% release) versus 5 (40% release) and 4 (25% release) versus 6
(95% release). In addition, naphthylallyl derivatives perform better
than their naphthylmethyl analogues, for example, 5 (40% release)
versus 6 (95% release) and 8 (20% release) versus 9 (50% release).
This latter trend may be the result of production of a more stable
naphthylallyl cation or may reflect greater transfer of electron
density in the excited states of the naphthylallyl systems as
suggested by simple Hu¨ckel calculations. These calculations, at least
qualitatively, reproduce the general trends observed for diazeni-
umdiolate photorelease from compounds 2-9 (Supporting Informa-
tion).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental details concern-
ing the synthesis of 2-10 and of authentic products, quantification of
photoreleased diazeniumdiolate 1, and Hu¨ckel calculations on the first
excited states of 2-10 (PDF). This material is available free of charge
References
(1) For a recent review of the chemistry of diazeniumdiolate derivatives,
see: Hrabie, J. A.; Keefer, L. K. Chem. ReV. 2002, 102, 1135-1154.
(2) For a previous study involving potential photochemical precursors to
diazeniumdiolates 1, see: Makings, L. R.; Tsien, R. Y. J. Biol. Chem.
1994, 269, 6282-6285.
(3) For a recent review of NO-donor chemistry, see: Wang, P. G.; Xian, M.;
Tang, X.; Wu, X.; Wen, Z.; Cai, T.; Janczuk, A. J. Chem. ReV. 2002,
102, 1091-1134.
(4) Srinivasan, A.; Kebede, N.; Saavedra, J. E.; Nikolaitchik, A. V.; Brady,
D. A.; Yourd, E. Y.; Davies, K. M.; Keefer, L. K.; Toscano, J. P. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5465-5472.
(5) Ruane, P. H.; Bushan, K. M.; Pavlos, C. M.; D’Sa, R. A.; Toscano, J. P.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9806-9811.
(6) A full characterization of the photochemistry of diazeniumdiolates 1 will
soon be reported: D’Sa, R. A.; Ruane, P. H.; Kumar, N. A.; Relyea, H.
A.; Toscano, J. P. Manuscript in preparation.
(7) (a) Givens, R. S.; Matuszewski, B.; Neywick, C. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1974, 96, 5547-5552. (b) DeCosta, D. P.; Pincock, J. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1993, 115, 2180-2190. (c) Pincock, J. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997,
30, 43-49
(8) (a) Maragos, C. M.; Morley, D.; Wink, D. A.; Dunams, T. M.; Saavedra,
J. E.; Hoffman, A.; Bove, A. A.; Isaac, L.; Hrabie, J. A.; Keefer, L. K. J.
Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 3242-3247. (b) Ramamurthi, A.; Lewis, R. S.
Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 408-413. (c) Supporting Information.
(9) Frank, R.; Gauglitz, G. J. Photochem. 1977, 7, 355-357.
(10) Rao, G. V.; Reddy, M. J. R.; Srinivas, K.; Reddy, M. J. R.; Bushan, K.
M.; Rao, V. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2002, 76, 29-34.
(11) (a) Zimmerman, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8988-8991. (b)
Zimmerman, H. E. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 5616-5621.
(12) (a) Seiler, P.; Wirz, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 1683-1686. (b) Shizuka,
H. Acc. Chem. Res. 1985, 18, 141-147. (c) Tolbert, L. M.; Solntsev, K.
M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 19-27. (d) Agmon, N.; Rettig, W.; Groth,
C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 1089-1096.
(13) The observed aldehydes are not primary products of either Path A or B
(Scheme 1). They likely arise from secondary photolysis of primary oxime
products as has been observed,4,5 or via a reaction pathway involving the
extrusion of nitrous oxide (N2O) that has also been observed.4
(14) Compound 6 has a UV-vis absorption band centered at 336 nm (ꢀ )
9780 M-1 cm-1) that tails out to A ) 0 at approximately 400 nm. It is
soluble up to 20 µM in 95% aqueous acetonitrile and is stable at room
temperature in pH 2, 7, and 11 solutions for at least 24 h. We are currently
developing derivatives of 6 with enhanced water solubility; these results
will be reported in due course.
The most efficient NO-releasing compound of those examined
in this study, both in terms of diazeniumdiolate photorelease and
quantum yield of photodecomposition, is naphthylallyl derivative
6. Importantly, this precursor overcomes the shortcomings of the
previously studied benzyl derivatives.5 The high efficiency of
JA027957H
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 43, 2002 12641