Al proceeded at the C-2 position with excellent regioselec-
tivity and furnished the 1,3-diol (+)-14; the primary alcohol
(-)-15 was then synthesized by chemoselective protection
of secondary alcohol through the acetalization and reductive
cleavage of the resulting acetal ring. Subsequent Swern
oxidation of (-)-15 afforded aldehyde (-)-9 in 97% yield.
After the precursor was obtained for the nitroaldol reaction,
we examined the asymmetric nitroaldol reaction of aldehyde
(-)-9. Initially, we used Trost’s asymmetric catalyst,12 which
involves a dinuclear zinc complex center with a chiral semi-
azacrown ligand for this asymmetric nitroaldol reaction.
Unfortunately, the attempts to use this catalyst were unsuc-
cessful. The stereoselectivity was very high (up to 92% de),
but the yield (55%) of desired product was unsatisfactory.
We subsequently applied Yamada’s conditions13 for this
step on account of its mildness and convenience. Further-
more, both enantiomers of the catalysts (16a, 16b) are
available commercially and more easily at hand. The results
of our asymmetric nitroaldol reaction toward the aldehyde
(-)-9 are shown in Table 1.
the yield was still low (entry 2). For improvement in yield,
we examined the type of base. By using DBU as a base, the
reaction afforded the product (-)-8 in 94% yield, with no
selectivity (entry 4). Varying the equivalents of catalyst and
DIPEA (entries 5-7), revealed that the best conditions were
as in entry 7, which requires 0.1 equiv of catalyst, 2.5 equiv
of DIPEA; this afforded a high yield (89%) of product with
excellent selectivity (97% de). However, in the case of
application of (S,S)-salen cobalt complex (16b), we obtained
the corresponding syn-diastereomer (-)-11 in high yield
(92%) with good selectivity (78% de) (entry 8).
The construction of the cyclic guanidine part is shown in
Scheme 3. Introduction of guanidyl group was achieved
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Cyclic Guanidine (-)-6a
Table 1. Investigation of Asymmetric Nitroaldol Reaction of
(-)-9 Using Salen Cobalt Complexes ((R,R) ) 16a, (S,S) )
16b)
a Ms2O ) methanesulfonic anhydride.
through reduction of the nitro group to the primary amine
with Pd and ammonium formate, followed by guanylation
with the reagent 17.15 After the preparation of guanidine
compound (-)-7, we chose to investigate the SN2 cyclization
procedure for construction of 5-membered cyclic guanidine.
Treatment of guanidine compound (-)-7 with Ms2O, pyri-
dine, and DMAP in CH2Cl2 provided the corresponding
mesylate. Then exposure of the mesylate to tertiary amine
and heat allowed us to obtain the desired cyclic guanidine
(-)-6 in 97% yield with inversion of the C-4′ stereocenter.
To deliver the (5R,4′R)-K01-0509 B (5) from (-)-6,
introduction of the carbamoyl function and oxidation to
carboxylic acid remained. Deprotection of the TBS group
with TBAF, followed by oxidation of the resulting primary
alcohol, furnished the aldehyde (-)-18 in excellent yield
(Scheme 4). With this aldehyde, we introduced the carbamoyl
function on the guanidyl nitrogen. Further oxidation by
treatment with NaClO2 under standard conditions (NaH2PO4,
2-methyl-2-butene) gave the carboxylic acid (-)-19. Re-
moval of the PMP group using CAN in a mixture (1:1) of
time
(h)
yielde selectivityk
entrya cat. (equiv) bases (equiv)
(%)
(% de)
1b
2
3c
4
16a (0.02) DIPEA (1.0)
16a (0.02) DIPEA (1.0)
63
62
8:f 22g
8: 31h
8: 71i
46
78
34
0
98
81
97
78
16a (0.02) DIPEA (1.0) 129
16a (0.02) DBU (1.0)
0.75 8: 94
5
16a (0.1)
DIPEA (1.0) 129
8: 29j
6
16a (0.02) DIPEA (3.0)
97
60
69
8: 73
8: 89
11: 92
7
8d
16a (0.1)
16b (0.1)
DIPEA (2.5)
DIPEA (2.5)
a Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were run at -40 °C. b Carried
out at -78 °C. c Carried out at -20 °C. d (S,S)-salen cobalt complex (16b)
was used. e Isolated yields. f The absolute stereochemistry was determined
by analysis of the Mosher’s ester of compound 7.14 g 65% of 9 was
recovered. h 39% of 9 was recovered. i 17% of 9 was recovered. j 15% of
9 was recovered. k Diastereomeric excesses were determined by HPLC using
Chiralcel OD and hexane/2-propanol (99/1) as eluent.
(11) Finan, J. M.; Kishi, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 27, 2719-2722.
(12) (a) Trost, B. M.; Yeh, V. S. C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41,
861-863. (b) Trost, B. M.; Yeh, V. S. C.; Ito, H.; Bremeyer, N. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 2621-2623.
(13) (a) Kogami, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Ashizawa, T.; Kezuka, S.; Ikeno,
T.; Yamada, T. Chem. Lett. 2004, 33, 614-615. (b) Kogami, Y.; Nakajima,
T.; Ikeno, T.; Yamada, T. Synthesis 2004, 12, 1947-1950.
(14) The synthesis of Mosher’s ester of 6 and the results of the analysis
are described in the Supporting Information.
We carried out the reaction at various temperatures under
the standard conditions12b reported by Yamada et al. At -78
and -20 °C, the selectivity was very low (entries 1 and 3).
When we effected the reaction at -40 °C, the diastereo-
selectivity of the anti-product (-)-8 was up to 78% de, but
(15) (a) Bernatowicz, M. B.; Wu, Y.; Matsueda, G. R. Tetrahedron Lett.
1993, 34, 3389-3392. (b) Drake, B.; Patek, M.; Lebl, M. Synthesis 1994,
2, 579-582.
(10) Nicolaou, K. C.; Prasad, C. V. C.; Somers, P. K.; Hwang, C. K. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5335-5340.
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 24, 2006
5579