structure was incorrect.6,8 In this paper, we report the total
synthesis of ent-2 and its facile isomerization to ent-3.
These results fully corroborate the proposed structure for
2 and imply that it is unlikely to be an isolation artifact.
ring system is a ringꢀchain tautomer of a 3-hydroxy-1,5,7-
trione and all reported syntheses of this acid- and base-
sensitive ring system have relied on a favorable equilib-
rium with ring-opened tautomers established under mild
conditions.15 In the context of synthetic studies on muamvatin
(15), both 1415a and ent-10-epi-1415b were prepared in mod-
erate to excellent yields under thermodynamic control.
Although formation of the caloundrin B ring system is
more challenging,16 we selected the (4S,10S) diastereomer
12 as the core trioxaadamantane fragment with hopes that
it would be a stable tautomer of 13. The thiopyran route to
polypropionates17 was expected to provide stereoselective
access to 13 from the known precursors 9,18 10,19 and 11.20
Ketone 7 would be available from 12 by straightforward
functional group manipulation.
Scheme 1. Siphonariid Decapropionates
The synthesis commenced with desulfurization of 16
(>98% ee), prepared in two steps from 9 and 10,14,18
followed by aldol reaction of the resulting ethyl ketone via
its Li enolate with 1120 to afford 17 as a mixture of
diastereomers in good yield (Scheme 3). Hydrolysis of
the ethylene acetal and silyl ether in 17 followed by
chemoselective oxidation of the C-9 alcohol with the
Dess-Martin periodinane (DMP) and equilibration of
the 3-hydroxy-1,5,7-trione product in the presence of
imidazole provided the hemiacetal 19 in moderate yield.
Despite extensive experimentation, we were unable to
obtain the desired 12 by tautomerization of 19.21 We
speculated that 19 might be favored in the equilibrium
because of a stabilizing intramolecular hydrogen bond
between the anomeric OH group and the benzyl (Bn) ether.
The juxtaposition of these groups is enforced by avoidance
of a syn-pentane interaction between the C-8 Me group
and the substituents at C-10. The C-10 epimer of 19 should
not be similarly stabilized, and to test that hypothesis, a
mixture of adducts 18 was prepared by desulfurization of
ent-16 followed by aldol reaction with 11 as described
above. Gratifyingly, subjecting 18 to the same three-step
sequence that gave 19 from 17 produced a separable 3:1
equilibrium mixture of trioxaadamantane 20 and the
corresponding hemiacetal (i.e., ent-10-epi-19).22
The anticipated7,8 instability of 2, corroborated by our
failed attempts at the synthesis of 2 by isomerization of 1
or 3,6 predicated a synthetic plan based on elaboration
of a preformed 2,4,6-trioxatricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decan-1-ol
(hereafter “trioxaadamantane”) fragment (Scheme 2).
We chose to assemble the carbon framework of 2 by aldol
coupling of 7 with 8.9 Although both enantiomers of 8 are
known,10 the syntheses are lengthy and the product is
unstable and prone to racemization. We prepared (()-8
from the readily available 611 by treatment of its NaN-
(SiMe3)2 generated anion12 with formaldehyde followed
by oxidation with 2-iodoxybenzoic acid (IBX). Model
studies13 indicated that aldol reactions of (()-8 with Li
and B enolates of 3-pentanone were highly Felkin selective
suggesting that kinetic resolution would be possible in
analogous reactions with suitable enantiopure ketones
(e.g., 7).14 The possibility of selectively obtaining different
adduct diastereomers simply by altering the reaction
conditions was seen as an advantage of this synthetic
approach,14 especially if the proposed relative configura-
tion of 2 was incorrect.8 Formally, the trioxaadamantane
(16) Computational comparison (ref 15e) of truncated models (i.e.,
with an Et substituent at C-9) of the caloundrin B trioxaadamantane
(4R,8R relative configuration) and muamvatin trioxaadamantane
(4S,8R relative configuration) suggests the former is 2 kJ/mol less stable
and the equilibrium for its formation 5 kJ/mol less favorable.
(17) Ward, D. E. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11375–11393.
(18) Ward, D. E.; Jheengut, V.; Beye, G. E.; Gillis, H. M.; Karagiannis,
A.; Becerril-Jimenez, F. Synlett 2011, 508–512.
(19) Ward, D. E.; Rasheed, M. A.; Gillis, H. M.; Beye, G. E.;
Jheengut, V.; Achonduh, G. T. Synthesis 2007, 1584–1586.
ꢀ
(20) de Lemos, E.; Poree, F.-H.; Bourin, A.; Barbion, J.; Agouridas, E.;
Lannou, M.-I.; Commerc-on, A.; Betzer, J.-F.; Pancrazi, A.; Ardisson, J.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 11092–11112.
(21) The anomer of 19 is the direct precursor of 12. See ref 15e for
reaction conditions used for isomerization.
(22) The relative configuration for the trioxaadamantane in 20 was
(9) Formation of the C11ꢀC12 bond by aldol coupling was rejected
because of anticipated difficulties in forming an enolate in the presence
of the pyrone and in achieving the required stereoselectivity.
(10) (a) Arimoto, H.; Yokoyama, R.; Okumura, Y. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 4749–4750. (b) Paterson, I.; Chen, D. Y.-K.; Acena, J. L.;
Franklin, A. S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1513–1516. Also see ref 2c.
(11) Mullock, E. B.; Suschitzky, H. J. Chem. Soc. C 1967, 828–830.
(12) Sengoku, T.; Takemura, T.; Fukasawa, E.; Hayakawa, I.;
Kigoshi, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 325–328.
(13) Details of this study will be reported separately.
(14) Ward, D. E.; Becerril-Jimenez, F.; Zahedi, M. M. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 4447–4454.
confirmed by NMR (CDCl3) as described in ref 15e; δC‑6 = 35.8, δC‑8
=
3
3
(15) (a) Paterson, I.; Perkins, M. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115,
1608–1610. (b) Dahmann, G.; Hoffmann, R. W. Liebigs Ann. Chem.
1994, 837–845. (c) Hoffmann, R. W.; Dahmann, G. Chem. Ber. 1994,
127, 1317–1322. (d) Lister, T.; Perkins, M. V. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1827–
1830. (e) Beye, G. E.; Goodman, J. M.; Ward, D. E. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
1373–1376.
34.9, δH3CC‑6 = 0.89, JHC4ꢀHC5 = 3.5 Hz, and JHC6ꢀHC8 ≈ 0 Hz are
particularly diagnostic. The absolute configuration of the trioxaadamantane is
established by the absolute configuration of the known 16. The (S) config-
uration at C-10 originates from the known (S)-11; isomerization can be ruled
out because ent-20 was not formed from 17 and ent-19 was not formed
from 18.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 6, 2012
1649