On the basis of this synthetic plan, we initially prepared
γ-pyrone 3 as follows (Scheme 2). Known â-ketoacid 54 was
oxidation10 of resulting alcohol 12 gave the desired aldehyde
4 quantitatively.
Aldol reaction between γ-pyrone 3 and aldehyde 4 with
LHMDS gave aldol adduct 2 in 74% yield (Scheme 4). The
Scheme 2. Synthesis of γ-Pyrone (3)
Scheme 4. Aldol Reaction of γ-Pyrone (3) and Aldehyde (4)
treated with mixture of acetone and Ac2O in the presence of
5
catalytic amount of concd H2SO4 to give the dioxinone 6
desired nonconjugated olefin of 1 from aldol adduct 2 was
unsuccessful, though elimination of mesylate under basic
conditions and thermal decomposition of xanthate were
attempted. Further isomerization11 of 13 into 1 was also
unsuccessful.
in 92% yield. Dioxinone 6 was converted into ketone 7 in
64% yield for two steps by aldol reaction with acetaldehyde
followed by oxidation6 of the resulting alcohol under Swern
conditions.7 Ketone 7 was then treated with sodium meth-
oxide in methanol to give the γ-hydroxy-R-pyrone 8 in 83%
yield via deprotection of the acetonide group and successive
cyclization of the resulting diketoester. Regioselective O-
methylation of 8 with methylfluorosulfonate8 provided
R-methoxy-γ-pyrone 3 in 93% yield.
Although aldol adduct 2 could not be converted to the
desired non-conjugated olefin, the aldol reaction between
γ-pyrone and aldehyde was useful for SAR studies on
verticipyrone libraries. This observation prompted us to
design an appropriate aldehyde to selectively generate a
nonconjugated olefin after aldol reaction. Therefore, R-phe-
nylsulfonyl aldehyde 16 was designed as it would allow
reductive elimination of â-hydroxysulfone via a novel
“Reverse Julia olefination” process after aldol reaction.
R-Phenylsulfonyl ester 14 was alkylated sequentially to
give the R-dialkyl ester 15 in 82% overall yield (Scheme
5). Reduction of the ethyl ester by DIBAL afforded R-phe-
nylsulfonyl aldehyde 16 in 99% yield. Coupling the γ-pyrone
3 and aldehyde 16 using LDA gave the Julia hydroxysulfone
17 in 74% yield. Finally, acetylation and reductive elimina-
tion afforded nonconjugated olefin 1 (59%) and its Z-isomer
18 (33%). Synthetic verticipyrone (1) was identical to the
natural product in all respects (1H and 13C NMR, IR, FAB-
MS, and inhibitory activity against NFRD).
The side chain aldehyde 4 was prepared as illustrated in
Scheme 3. Alkylation of diethyl methylmalonate 9 with NaH
Scheme 3. Synthesis of Aldehyde (4)
(4) Tirpak, R. E.; Olsen, R. S.; Rathke, M. W. J. Org. Chem. 1985, 50,
4877.
(5) Sato, M.; Ogasawara, H.; Oi, K.; Kato, T. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983,
31, 6.
(6) Direct acetylation of 6 was unsuccessful and gave only O-acetylated
product.
(7) Omura, K.; Swern, D. Tetrahedoron 1978, 34, 1651.
(8) Beak, P.; Lee, J.; McKinnie, G. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 1367.
(9) Krapcho, A. P.; Weimaster, J. F.; Eldridge, J. M.; Jahngen, E. G. E.,
Jr.; Lovey, A. J.; Stephens, W. P. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 138.
(10) Parikh, J. R.; Doering, W. v. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89,
5505.
(11) Fletcher, S. R.; Baker, R.; Chambers, M. S.; Herbert, R. H.; Hobbs,
S. C.; Thomas, S. R.; Verrier, H. M.; Watt, A. P.; Ball, R. G. J. Org. Chem.
1994, 59, 1771.
and iodooctane gave 10 quantitatively. Decarboxylation9 of
10 with LiCl in aqueous DMSO solution afforded 11 in 86%
yield. Reduction of the ethyl ester 11 by LiAlH4 and
(2) Ohmura, S.; Shiomi, K.; Masuma, R. PCT WO 2003050104, 2004.
(3) Recent synthetic approach for the other complex I inhibitors: (a)
Ichimaru, N.; Abe, M.; Murai, M.; Senoh, M.; Nishioka, T.; Miyoshi, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 3555. (b) Schnermann, M. J.; Romero,
F. A.; Hwang, I.; Nakamaru-Ogiso, E.; Yagi, T.; Boger, D. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 11799.
66
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 1, 2007