Group 4 Transition Metal CH2dMCl2 and HC÷MCl3 Complexes
Organometallics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2007 333
Figure 2. IR spectra taken in the 710-450 cm-1 region taken after
laser-ablated titanium atoms were reacted with (a) CH2Cl2, (b)
13CH2Cl2, and (c) CD2Cl2 diluted in argon. All spectra were recorded
after full-arc photolysis (λ > 220 nm). Arrows denote product
absorptions.
Figure 1. Infrared spectra taken in the 690-460 cm-1 region after
(a) laser-ablated titanium atoms were reacted with CH2Cl2/Ar, and
the resulting matrix was subjected to (b) irradiation with λ > 290
nm, (c) irradiation with λ > 220 nm, and (d) annealing to 30 K.
Arrows denote product absorptions.
in all figures.) Hence the three observed bands can be assigned
to a single reaction product. The strongest absorption, at 504.3
cm-1, remains nearly unchanged on 13C and D isotopic
substitution (0.5 and 1.9 cm-1 shifts, respectively). This is also
only slightly higher than the 502.6 cm-1 Ti-Cl stretching mode
in TiCl4.26a Hence, the observed product absorption can be
assigned to a Ti-Cl stretching frequency. The next highest peak,
at 675.0 cm-1, shows a modest 5.3 cm-1 carbon-13 shift and a
large 134.5 cm-1 deuterium isotopic shift (frequency ratio 1.249)
(Figure 2). These values are similar to those for the observed
Unless otherwise noted, all theoretical calculations were com-
puted using the Gaussian ’98 package.22 The B3LYP hybrid
functional23 was used with the 6-311++G(2d,p) basis for all atoms
except the transition metal, where the SDD pseudopotential was
employed.24,25 These calculations will enable comparisons with other
methylidene complexes.8-19 Vibrational frequencies were computed
analytically, and all energy values reported include zero-point
vibrational corrections. As a calibration, our calculation for the
stable molecule TiCl4 gave a tetrahedral structure with a strong IR
mode at 499.7 cm-1, which compares favorably with the argon
matrix absorption26a at 502.6 cm-1. Our DFT calculation predicts
TiCl4 to be more stable than Ti and two Cl2 by 285 kcal/mol, which
may be compared to the gas phase thermodynamic value of 295 (
2 kcal/mol.26b
CH2 wagging motion of the CH2dTiF2 complex (695.4 cm-1
;
6.0 and 138.6 cm-1 13C and D shifts, respectively).17 The last
observed vibration at 679.7 cm-1 shows the largest carbon-13
shift (20.1 cm-1) and a modest deuterium shift (71.9 cm-1),
and it can be assigned to a mostly CdTi stretching mode. A
final fourth absorption was observed at 978.9 cm-1 only in
experiments when CD2Cl2 was employed.
3. Results and Discussion
Reactions between group 4 transition metals and CH2Cl2 or
CHCl3 will be investigated, and product infrared spectra and
DFT calculations will be reported in turn.
3.1. Ti + CH2Cl2. When laser-ablated titanium atoms react
with methylene chloride, new product absorptions are observed
at 503.0 with matrix site splitting at 505.5, 675.0, and 679.7
cm-1. All three absorptions increase in unison on all photolysis,
remain nearly unchanged on annealing (Figure 1), and maintain
constant relative intensity in experiments with different precursor
concentrations. (Arrows are used to denote product absorptions
The three identified product modes (Ti-Cl stretch, CH2 wag,
and CdTi stretch) lead to identification of the stable
CH2dTiCl2 complex with confidence. Our computed frequen-
cies for this complex compare favorably with the observed
spectrum (Table 1). Typically DFT-computed frequencies are
a few percent higher than observed values.9-16,26c The fourth
strongest mode predicted for the CH2dTiCl2 complex (Ti-Cl
symmetric stretch; 374.7 cm-1) is below our spectral limits. The
CH2 bending mode was computed to be nearly twice as intense
for the deuterated isotopomer at 1033.1 cm-1 and is in
satisfactory agreement with the fourth peak observed at 978.9
cm-1 when CD2Cl2 was employed. This gain in intensity is due
to increased coupling with the CdTi stretching mode.
Singlet methylidene CH2dTiCl2 is predicted to be 127
kcal/mol more stable than the sum of the individual methylene
chloride and titanium atom reactants and 29 kcal/mol more
stable than the triplet CH2(µ-Cl)TiCl primary insertion product.
Another possible singlet methylidene complex, CHCldTiHCl,
is 62 kcal/mol higher in energy than CH2dTiCl2, and the
computed vibrational spectrum is vastly different (including a
strong Ti-H stretching mode near 1700 cm-1, which is not
observed). Although R-H transfer may be faster than R-Cl
transfer, the latter is much more favorable energetically. The
CH2dTiCl2 complex has been studied theoretically over the last
two decades;27-37 however, this is the first experimental
observation to our knowledge.
(22) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb,
M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.;
Stratmann, R. E.; Burant, J. C.; Dapprich, S.; Millam, J. M.; Daniels, A.
D.; Kudin, K. N.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Cossi,
M.; Cammi, R.; Mennucci, B.; Pomelli C.,; Adamo, C.; Clifford, S.;
Ochterski, J.; Petersson, G. A.; Ayala, P. Y.; Cui, Q.; Morokuma, K.; Rega,
N.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Cioslowski, J.; J. V. Ortiz,; Baboul, A.
G.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.;
Gomperts, R.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng,
C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.;
Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Andres, J. L.; Gonzalez, C.; Head-Gordon, M.;
Replogle, E. S.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 98, Revision A.11.4; Gaussian, Inc.:
Pittsburgh, PA, 2002.
(23) (a) Becke, A. D. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648. (b) Lee, C.; Yang,
Y.; Parr, R. G. Phys. ReV. B 1988, 37, 785.
(24) Frisch, M. J.; Pople, J.A.; Binkley, J.S. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80,
3265.
(25) Andrae, D.; Haeussermann, U. Dolg, M.; Stoll, H.; Preuss, H. Theor.
Chim. Acta 1990, 77, 123.
(26) (a) Ko¨niger, F.; Carter, R. O.; Mu¨ller, A. Spectrochim. Acta 1976,
32A, 891. (b) Cox, J. D.; Wagman, D. D.; Medvedev, V. A. CODATA,
Key Values for Thermodynamics; Hemisphere Publishing Corp: New York,
1989. (c) Scott, A. P.; Radom, L. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 16502.
(27) Rappe´, A. K.; Goddard, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 297.
(28) Rappe´, A. K.; Goddard, W. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 448.