sodium borohydride in methanol produces the 3,4-syn-isomers
5a,b in high yield and excellent diastereomeric purity via 1,2-
stereoinduction and it is in agreement with the known results
on related systems.29 The 3,4-anti-isomers 6a,b were prepared
using our previously reported catalytic reduction with NaBH4–
cat. MnCl2·4H2O system in methanol by 1,3-asymmetric
induction via Mn2+ chelation.28 The chemoselective catalytic N-
debenzylation of 5a,b and 6a,b produces the 2-amino-4-aryl-4-
hydroxy-3-methylbutanoic acids 7a,b and 8a,b, the non-natural
analogues of N-terminal amino acid of nikkomycins.
Absolute configuration assignment of the carbons C-2 and C-
3 of the parent adducts 4a,b and 4aꢀ was made by their trans-
formation to intermediates of biologically important compounds
and at the same time the relative configuration was also tested.
Pd-catalyzed hydrogenation proceeds smoothly in an EtOH–H2O
combination with excess of HBr. No epimerization to the (2S,3S)-
2-amino-3-methyl-4-phenylbutanoic acid 9a has been observed.
The NMR spectral data and optical properties are in agreement
with those published by Kimura et al. in the kulokekahelide
studies.20
Furthermore, the methoxy substituted hydroxyamino acids
7b,8b were transferred to the known Boc-protected lactones
12b,13b30 (Scheme 5)—intermediates of the nikkomycin-B
synthesis—and their NMR spectral data as well as their specific
optical rotation confirm the (2S,3R,4S)-12b or (2S,3R,4R)-13b
configuration and conclude the absolute and relative structural
assignment of methoxy substituted derivatives given above.
Elucidation of the relative and absolute configuration
Determination of the relative configuration on the newly formed
stereogenic centres was based on the results obtained from NOE
experiments, which were performed on cyclic derivatives 10a,b and
11a,b.
Acid-catalyzed lactonization of the phenyl substituted hydrox-
yamino acids 5a,6a under simple stirring in diluted HCl led to
the corresponding crystalline lactones 10a,11a in high yield. One
recrystallization seems to be sufficient to obtain these nicely crys-
talline hydrochlorides in excellent stereochemical homogeneity
(dr > 99 : 1). In the case of methoxy substituted derivatives 5b,6b
the lactonization took place smoothly under mild conditions (3 M
HCl, 4 h, rt), however, in both cases the all cis-isomer 10b was
isolated in excellent both yield and purity. Such a result accords
with our recently described CIAT application on closely related
derivatives.16
Scheme 5 Lactone 12b,13b synthesis, absolute configuration elucidation.
(i) a: 12 M HCl, rt, 1 h, filtration, 100%; b: (Boc)2O, NEt3, dioxane, 50%,
12 : 13 ratio 98 : 2; (ii) a: Boc2O, NEt3, CH2Cl2, 30 ◦C, b: DCC, CH2Cl2,
5 min (dr 81 : 19), chromatography, 28% of 13b, 12 : 13 ratio 2 : 98.
Gratifyingly, the employment of DCC in our previously de-
scribed conditions allowed us to prepare the desired lactone
11b under mild conditions (Scheme 4). As expected, the NOE’s
observed between protons at C-2, C-3 and C-4 testified to
the relative all cis-configuration of 10b (Scheme 4). Similarly
the NOE data clearly confirmed the expected 3,4-trans-relative
configuration on the lactone 11b. The relative configurations of
all hydroxyamino acids 5,6 and corresponding lactones 10a,11a
were tentatively assigned on the basis of these results.
Conclusions
We have successfully broadened the scope of CIAT in the conjugate
addition of N-nucleophiles to substituted aroylacrylic acids. We
have demonstrated an efficient CIAT methodology, enabling an
efficient stereocontrol over two new stereogenic centers. We report
herein a two-step and inexpensive preparation of the 4-aryl
substituted 2-amino-3-methylbutanoic acids and their 4-hydroxy
substituted derivatives, respectively, with high degree of both
diastereomeric and enantiomeric purity.
Acknowledgements
Financial support by the Slovak Grant Agency No. 1/2469/05
and NMR measurements provided by the Slovak State Programme
Project No. 2003SP200280203 are gratefully acknowledged.
References
1 K. M. J. Brands and A. J. Davies, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 2711–2733.
2 N. G. Anderson, Org. Process Res. Dev., 2005, 9, 800–813.
3 J. W. Schroer and K. M. Ng, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2003, 42, 2230–2244.
4 K. Kinbara, Synlett, 2005, 732–743.
5 E. J. Ebbers, G. J. A. Ariaans, J. P. M. Houbiers, A. Bruggink and
B. Zwanenburg, Tetrahedron, 1997, 53, 9417–9476.
6 D. Ferraris, B. Young, C. Cox, T. Dudding, W. J. Drury, lll, L. Ryzhkov,
A. E. Taggi and T. Lectka, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 67–77.
7 S. Kobayashi, R. Matsubara, Y. Nakamura, H. Kitagawa and
M. Sugiura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 2507–2515.
8 A. S. Golubev, N. Sewald and K. Burger, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 14757–
14776.
9 R. F. W. Jackson, R. J. Moore, C. S. Dexter, J. Elliott and C. E. Mowbray,
J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 7875–7884.
10 I. Rilatt, L. Caggiano and R. F. W. Jackson, Synlett, 2005, 2701–2719.
Scheme 4 Lactone formation, establishment of relative configuration. (i)
10a: 3 M HCl, rt, 24 h, filtration, 10 : 11 ratio 98 : 2, 90%; 11a: 8 M HCl,
40 ◦C, 20 h, filtration, 10 : 11 ratio 3 : 97, 76%; (ii) 10b: 3 M HCl, rt, 4 h,
filtration, 10 : 11 ratio 95 : 5, 89–90%; (iii) 11b: DCC, CH2Cl2, rt, 20 h,
chromatography, 10 : 11 ratio 2 : 98, 50%.
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2007
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2007, 5, 121–124 | 123
©