Organometallics
Article
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Scheme 1. Scope of Propargylic Reduction with Hantzsch
Ester
■
a
We investigated reactions of 1-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)prop-2-
yn-1-ol (2a) with Hantzsch ester (3) in the presence of
catalytic amounts of thiolate-bridged diruthenium complexes
(1) and NH4BF4 to afford 3-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)-1-propyne
(4a) as the corresponding propargylic reduced product.
Typical results are shown in Table 1. The reaction of 2a
a
Table 1. Screening the Reaction Conditions
b
a
entry
solvent
3 (equiv)
Ru complex 1 [mol %]
yield (%)
Reactions of 2 (0.25 mmol) with 3 (0.25 mmol) were carried out in
the presence of 1a (0.0125 mmol, 5 mol %) and NH4BF4 (0.025
mmol, 10 mol %) in THF (2.5 mL) at 60 °C for 6 h.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
DME
DCM
DCE
Et2O
MeCN
toluene
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
THF
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1a [10]
1a [10]
1a [10]
1a [10]
1a [10]
1a [10]
1a [10]
1b [10]
1a [10]
1a [5]
85
83
79
0
alcohols were suitable for this protocol, giving the desired
products in high to quantitative yields. Relatively, isolated
yields are generally lower than NMR yields due to the high
volatility of the propargylic reduced products. The presence of
both electron-withdrawing and -donating groups on the
benzene ring at the propargylic position was well tolerated to
give the products in high yields (4a−n). However, the
introduction of trifluoromethyl and dibromo groups to the
benzene ring at the propargylic position significantly decreased
the yields of the products to 43% and 63%, respectively (4i,n).
Naphthyl groups in place of phenyl groups at the propargylic
position were also tolerated in this protocol to give the desired
products in high yields (4o,p). It is noteworthy that tertiary
propargylic alcohols bearing two aryl groups at the propargylic
position were transformed successfully to afford the corre-
sponding 3,3-diaryl-1-alkynes in 66−80% yields (4q−t).
We also investigated the use of propargylic alcohols bearing
alkyl group(s) at the propargylic position under the same
reaction conditions. The reaction of 2-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-
yl)but-3-yn-2-ol (2u) gave 3-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4-yl)-1-butyne
(4u) in 88% yield. This result is in sharp contrast to the
formation of the corresponding 1,3-enynes from reactions of
propargylic alcohols bearing only alkyl groups at the
propargylic position such as 1-ethynyl-4-phenylcyclohexanol
(2v) and 1-tetradecyn-3-ol (2w) (Scheme 2). These results
indicate that propargylic alcohols bearing only alkyl groups at
the propargylic position were not applicable in the current
reaction system.9a To demonstrate the potential of this
protocol in practical synthesis, we carried out a large-scale
reaction of 1 mmol of 2a under the same reaction conditions
to afford 4a in quantitative yield.
0
70
90
88
99
94
99
trace
0
c
1a [5]
1a [0.1]
none
a
Unless noted otherwise, reactions of 2a (0.25 mmol) with 3 were
carried out in the presence of 1 and NH4BF4 (0.025 mmol, 10 mol %)
in solvent (2.5 mL) at room temperature for 18 h. Isolated yields.
At 60 °C for 6 h.
b
c
with 1.5 equiv of 3 was carried out in the presence of 10 mol %
of the methanethiolate-bridged diruthenium complex
[Cp*RuCl(SMe)]2 (1a; Cp* = η5-C5Me5) and 10 mol % of
NH4BF4 at room temperature for 18 h. First, we used various
solvents such as 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME), dichloro-
methane (DCM), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), diethyl ether,
acetonitrile, toluene, and THF. Among them, THF was proved
to be the optimal solvent (Table 1, entries 1−7). When the 2-
propanethiolate-bridged diruthenium complex [Cp*RuCl(Si-
Pr)]2 (1b) was used in place of 1a as a catalyst, the yield of 4a
decreased slightly (Table 1, entry 8). When the amount of 3
was reduced to 1.0 equiv, 4a was obtained quantitatively
(Table 1, entry 9). In contrast, reduction of the amount of 1a
to 5 mol % slightly decreased the yield of 4a (Table 1, entry
10). On the other hand, the reaction in the presence of 5 mol
% of 1a at 60 °C gave 4a quantitatively (Table 1, entry 11).
However, when the catalyst loading of 1a was reduced to 0.1
mol %, only a trace amount of 4a was observed (Table 1, entry
12). Separately, we confirmed that no reaction occurred in the
absence of catalyst together with recovery of 2a in 95% yield
(Table 1, entry 13).
In order to obtain a mechanistic insight, we examined the
reaction of a propargylic alcohol bearing an internal alkyne
moiety (2x) (Scheme 3). In this case, no target product was
observed at all, while 87% of the starting propargylic alcohol
was recovered. As mentioned in the Introduction, we
previously reported the propargylic reduction of propargylic
alcohols bearing an internal alkyne moiety with triethylsilane.9a
In sharp contrast to the previous reaction system, the present
With the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 11) in hand,
the scope of propargylic alcohols was investigated. Typical
results are shown in Scheme 1. A variety of propargylic
B
Organometallics XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX