530 Organometallics, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2007
Gallego et al.
7 forces the actuation of an associatively activated substitution
mechanism6,32,33 of SMe2 by PhBzl, the full process being very
disfavored with the bulky imine ligand. Figure S1 (Supporting
Information) collects the H NMR spectral monitoring of the
reactivity involved.
should then produce compound 7. Figure S1 also collects the
1H NMR spectral monitoring of the reactivity involved.
It is interesting to note that the triphenylphosphine derivatives
of complexes 1Z do not undergo such processes on the same
time scale. As expected from Scheme 3, the 31P NMR of a
solution of 1Bzl with a 4-fold excess of PPh3 does not show
the presence of any insertion product, 5Bzl, as indicated by the
lack of a signal at 18.7 ppm, corresponding to the opening of
the insertion product (see Seven-Membered Ring Opening).
Furthermore, after 4 days at room temperature only 5-10% of
the initial 1Bzl complex evolved, via reductive elimination, to
trans-[PtBrPh(PPh3)2], as indicated by its 31P NMR signal at
22.8 ppm with JPtP ) 3129 Hz. Probably the dramatic differ-
ences between the thioether and phosphine ligands account for
this fact. Not only is the better donor character of the phosphine
ligand bound to disfavor any reductive elimination process from
the metal center but also the bulkiness of the ligand induces a
more rigid orientation of the phenyl groups, thus disfavoring
the highly sterically demanding reductive elimination reac-
tion.
Seven-Membered Ring Opening. Decyclometalation of
complex 5Bzl, via substitutive decoordination of the iminic
nitrogen by SMe2, does not occur on the isolated complex.24
This lack of reactivity is surprising, given the important trans
inductive effect on the iminic nitrogen in the final ligand
distribution on the crystallized 5Bzl complex. The lack of
planarity observed in these systems can account for this fact.
Nevertheless, during all the insertion processes depicted in
Scheme 3 and studied under moderate [SMe2]added conditions,
an extra Z-dependent platinum-coupled signal around 2.75-
2.85 ppm appears in all cases (2.77 ppm, JPtH ) 52 Hz for Z )
Bzl; 2.86 ppm, JPtH ) 52 Hz for Z ) Me; 2.81 ppm, JPtH ) 52
Hz for Z ) CH2Mes). The position and coupling of the signal
correspond to the existence of a trans-[PtBr(C-substituted Ph)-
(SMe2)2] type of species.36 In order to establish the stability of
the formed seven-membered metallacycle in 5Z, the sulfide by
triphenyl phosphine substitution has been studied in full detail
for the 5Bzl compound. The process resulted in a rather
complicated sequence of changes in the 31P NMR spectra. The
speculative series of isomerization reactions involved are
depicted in Scheme 4; these are in fact consistent with
the structure found for complexes with bulkier DMSO and
PPh3 ligands in seven-membered metallacycle Pt(IV) com-
plexes.25,37
1
It is interesting to note that the cyclometalated Pt(IV)
complexes 1Z are a mixture of the two possible isomers,
showing a mer (Ph/Ph/SMe2) and fac (Ph/Ph/SMe2) distribution,
the latter being that indicated in Scheme 3 (see the Experimental
Section). The mer/fac isomerization process is found to be slow
enough at room temperature to make the two complexes
distinguishable by NMR spectroscopy.24,29 The facile intercon-
version of the pentacoordinated species formed on sulfide
decoordination, 2Z, can be held responsible for the isomerization
process.34 Theoretical calculations (see Calculations) indicate
that the energy demand of the transition state of the mer (Ph/
Ph/0) a fac (Ph/Ph/0) interconversion process between pen-
tacoordinated species, 2Z, is low. The free energy value in the
gas phase is only 8.72 kJ mol-1 for the mer to fac and 6.09 kJ
mol-1 for the fac to mer reactions for the 2Me complex, thus
favoring by 2.63 kJ mol-1 the mer isomeric form. In view of
the existence of these isomeric mixtures and the different
substitution labilities already observed for the mer (Me/Me/
SMe2) and fac (Me/Me/SMe2) complexes,29 some experiments
on the insertion reaction were carried out in order to determine
a possible isomeric discrimination for any of the reactions
indicated in Scheme 3. In all cases monitoring of the 1H NMR
spectra during the process did not indicate such discrimination,
the mer (Ph/Ph/SMe2) to fac (Ph/Ph/SMe2) isomeric ratio being
constant within experimental error during all the processes
leading to the final 5Z complexes.
Reductive Elimination Reaction. Some experiments run at
high [SMe2]added were designed in order to prevent the formation
of the expected pentacoordinated species occurring in solution
(Scheme 3).20,21 The results indicated that the insertion reaction
from 1Z to 5Z complexes is not only considerably retarded but
also even totally avoided when high dimethyl sulfide concentra-
tions are used (ca. (200-500) × [Pt]). The same effect was
observed whenever the experiments were run at high platinum
complex concentration, which has the effect of increasing the
presence of non-sulfide dissociated 1Z complex in the reaction
medium. The 1H NMR monitoring of the aforementioned
experiments shows a dominant signal at 2.35 ppm (JPtH ) 59
Hz), corresponding to the SMe2 ligand in trans-[PtBr(Ph)-
(SMe2)2] (7), while the NCH and NCH2 proton signals showed
also the presence of important amounts of free diphenylimine
(8.36 and 4.72 ppm for PhBzl; see the Experimental Section).
The formation of 7 and free diphenylimines, PhZ, has to occur
via a reductive elimination process of the cyclometalated ligand
and of one of the coordinated phenyl groups on hexacoordinated
1Z, to produce the tetracoordinated 6Z complexes (Scheme 3).
The process is, in fact, fairly similar to that described for similar
sp2-sp2 reductive coupling in intermediate Pt(IV) complexes
detected for some tetraphenylene-generating reactions.35 The
already established preferential coordination of SMe2 versus the
bulky PhZ biphenylimines on the Pt(II) complex (see above),
plus the stoichiometric excess of SMe2 in the reaction medium,
When an stoichiometric amount of PPh3 is added to the
complex 5Bzl, a set of two 31P NMR signals at 16.5 ppm (JPtP
) 1832 Hz) and at 15.5 ppm (JPtP ) 1888 Hz) appear in the
first spectrum recorded. The signals should thus correspond to
a coupled isomerization/substitution of the dimethyl sulfide
substitution product, as evaluated from the position and platinum
coupling of the signal, which indicates a cis (N/P) geometrical
distribution.38 During a period of 30-60 min at room temper-
ature the intensity of the signal at 16.5 ppm diminishes in favor
of that at 15.5 ppm, already reported in the synthetic procedure
published.24 The two complexes must have the same basic
geometrical arrangement, given the extremely similar magnetic
environments of the phosphine. Probably the rigidity of the
cyclometalated ring and the bulkiness of the phosphine ligand
force the separation of the two possible ring-based isomers, not
(32) Romeo, R.; Plutino, M. R.; Scolaro, L. M.; Stoccoro, S.; Minghetti,
G. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 4749-4755.
(33) Alibrandi, G.; Bruno, G.; Lanza, S.; Minniti, D.; Romeo, R.; Tobe,
M. L. Inorg. Chem. 1987, 26, 185-190.
(36) Hadj-Bagheri, M.; Puddephatt, R. J. Polyhedron 1988, 7, 2695-
2702.
(34) Wilkins, R. G. Kinetics and Mechanisms of Reactions of Transition
Metal Complexes; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1991.
(35) Edelbach, B. L.; Lachicotte, R. J.; Jones, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1998, 120, 2843-2853.
(37) Capape´, A.; Crespo, M.; Granell, J.; Vizcarro, A.; Zafrilla, J.; Font-
Bard, M.; Solans, X. Chem. Commun. 2006, 4128-4130.
(38) Crespo, M.; Solans, X.; Font-Bard´ıa, M. J. Organomet. Chem. 1996,
105-113.