be attributed to the difference in solvent polarity between
ethanol and methanol; the solution structure of 1b in
methanol and ethanol might be different, and these structural
characteristics might be conserved on dispersion into sodium
phosphate buffer.7 Clearly, further work is required to shed
light on the intriguing behaviors.
The UV spectrum of TE-FA 1c was found to resemble
that of TE-FA 1b, except for one aspect: the time-course
study of UV behaviors showed that the aggregate formed
from TE-FA 1c is less stable than the corresponding
aggregate formed from TE-FA 1b (panel B-1, Figure 3). The
observed difference in stability may be attributed to the fact
that the packing near the head of the TE-FA is tighter than
the packing near the tail, and therefore the chiral methyl
group at C-3 causes more severe disruption on aggregate
formation/stability than that at C-16. The CD spectrum of
TE-FA 1c was found to resemble that of TE-FA 1b, except
for two aspects (panel B-2, Figure 3). First, consistent with
the time-course study of the UV spectrum, the chiral
aggregate in the 1c series was found to be less stable than
the chiral aggregate in the 1b series. Second, both aggregates
prepared from ethanol and methanol stock solutions gave
Cotton curves with the same sign (panel B-2 vs panel B-3,
Figure 3).
Figure 4. UV and CD spectra of the aggregates formed from 2b
in sodium phosphate buffer (pH ) 7.0, 1 × 10-5 M) at room
temperature (23 ( 2 °C). Panel A-1: UV spectrum of 2b. Panel
A-2: CD spectrum of the aggregate prepared by dispersing an
ethanol stock solution of 2b into buffer. Panel A-3: CD spectrum
of the aggregate prepared by dispersing a methanol stock solution
into buffer.
Our previous study showed that TE-FA 2a in the C-20
series forms a kinetic aggregate, which is stable for several
hours up to overnight at room temperature. Through the
doping experiment with a saturated FA and a complexation
experiment with sMMP and sMGP,1,8 we demonstrated that
the aggregate in the C-20 series exhibits a vastly different
property from the aggregate in the C-24 series. For example,
upon addition of sMMP or sMGP, the former aggregate was
deaggregated, whereas the latter aggregate was not. We refer
to these properties as “dynamic” and “static”.1,2 Thus, we
anticipated that TE-FAs 2b,c (methylated analogues of 2a)
exhibit properties different from those of TE-FAs 1b,c
(methylated analogues of 1a). With this anticipation, we
synthesized both antipodes of TE-FAs 2b,c and tested their
UV behaviors, thereby demonstrating: (1) that TE-FA 2b
exists as an aggregate in sodium phosphate buffer and (2)
that this aggregate exhibits the stability anticipated from the
aggregate behavior observed for TE-FA 2a (panel A-1,
Figure 4).
The aggregate prepared by dispersing an ethanol stock
solution of TE-FA 2b into phosphate buffer exhibited a
surprising CD behavior (panel A-2, Figure 4). Extrapolating
from the TE-FA 1b case, we anticipated that the chiral
aggregate thus prepared should give a positive Cotton effect.
Indeed, the CD spectrum recorded immediately after the
sample preparation did give a positive Cotton curve. How-
ever, within 10 min, the positive Cotton curve inverted to
the negative Cotton curve, and its intensity reached a
maximum at around 20 min and then gradually decreased.10
The observed phenomenon is an example of so-called
stereomutation. Stereomutation is known for a number of
biomacromolecules11,12 but is rarely recognized for small
organic molecules.13 It is worth noting that most of the
reported examples for stereomutation are due to a change
of the surrounding environments such as solvents14-17 and
temperature16 or due to a method of sample preparation.18,19
Perhaps, the case of helical merocyanine dye nanorods
The aggregate prepared by dispersing a methanol stock
solution of TE-FA 2b into sodium phosphate buffer exhibited
the anticipated CD behavior (panel A-3, Figure 4).9 This CD
behavior compares well with that observed for TE-FA 1b,
including the handedness of the resultant chiral aggregate.
However, as anticipated from the UV experiment, the chiral
aggregate in the 2b series had a shorter lifetime than that in
the 1b series.
(10) The aggregate prepared from TE-FA 2c exhibited UV and CD
behaviors parallel with those observed for the aggregate prepared from TE-
FA 1c, except aggregate stability. For details, see Supporting Information.
(11) Stereomutation was observed for polypeptides. For example, see:
(a) Steinberg, I. Z.; Harrington, W. F.; Berger, A.; Sela, M.; Katchalski, E.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1960, 82, 5263. (b) Gratzer, W. B.; Rhodes, W.; Fasman,
G. D.; Biopolymers 1963, 1, 319. (c) Bidan, G.; Guilerez, S.; Sorokin, V.
AdV. Mater. 1996, 8, 157.
(12) Stereomutation was observed for nucleotides. For example, see: (a)
Pohl, F. M.; Jovin, T. M. J. Mol. Biol. 1972, 67, 375. (b) McIntosh, L. P.;
Zielinski, W. S.; Kalisch, B. W.; Pfeifer, G. P.; Sprinzl, M.; Drahovsky,
D.; van de Sande, J. H.; Jovin, T. M. Biochemistry 1985, 24, 4806.
(13) For stereomutation of small organic compounds, see, for example:
(a) ref 6e and (b) ref 4.
(14) Boiadjiev and Lightner observed a solvent-dependent chirality
inversion for an optically active dimethylmesobilirubin-XIIIR: see ref 6a.
(15) Meijer and co-workers reported at least two cases: (a) solvent
dependency of optical activity of chiral polythiophene aggregates (see ref
6c); (b) solvent dependency of chiral poly(ureidophthalimide) foldamers
(see ref 6d).
(7) An i-PrOH stock solution gave a result similar to an EtOH stock
solution.
(8) sMMP and sMGP are abbreviations of synthetic 3-O-methylmannose-
and 6-O-methylglucose-containing polysaccharides, respectively. Design and
synthesis of sMMP and sMGP. (a) sMMP: Hsu, M. C.; Lee, J.; Kishi, Y.
J. Org. Chem., submitted for publication. (b) sMGP: Meppen, M.; Wang,
Y.; Cheon, H.-S.; Kishi, Y. J. Org. Chem., submitted for publication.
(9) The antipode of 2b gave the identical CD results, but in the mirror
image.
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 2, 2007
321