C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
activities of silicon-containing small molecules. Not surprisingly,
key roles for functional group and stereochemical diversity (cf.
differential performance of enantiomeric pairs of products) can also
be ascertained (Figure 2C,D), where activity trends are observed
within each assay. Secondary assays were performed to demonstrate
dose-dependent activity and to obtain EC50 values for representative
compounds. Examples are shown for the growth inhibition of lung
adenocarcinoma (A549) cells and hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2)
cells (Figure 2E).15
We are currently working to understand the role of silicon in
the observed biological activity.16 This work provides a framework
to assess the roles of silicon in assay outcomes, including
comparative analyses of compounds having different substituents
attached to silicon and of compounds having silicon replaced with
carbon and other main-group elements.
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the NIGMS
Center for Chemical Methodology and Library Development (P50
GM069721), and in part with federal funds from the NCI’s Initiative
for Chemical Genetics, NIH, under Contract No. N01-CO-12400.
We thank Frank An, Richard Staples, Mary Pat Happ, and Paul
Clemons for assistance and insightful discussions. A.K.F. is grateful
for an NIH postdoctoral fellowship, and P.D.D. thanks Harvard
College Research Program for a summer undergraduate fellowship.
S.L.S. is an investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute
at the Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT.
Supporting Information Available: General experimental details,
spectral characterization data, X-ray structure, data analysis methods,
summary of assay type, and dose-response curves. This material is
References
(1) Kim, Y.-K.; Arai, M. A.; Arai, T.; Lamenzo, J. O.; Dean, E. F., III;
Patterson, N.; Clemons, P. A.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 14740-14745.
(2) Compared to their carbon analogues, organosilicon compounds exhibit
enhanced lipophilicity, stronger OH acidity, and more electropositive
character: Bains, W.; Tacke, R. Curr. Opin. Drug DiscoVery DeV. 2003,
6, 526-543.
(3) Richardson, P. G.; Hideshima, T.; Anderson, K. C. Cancer Control 2003,
10, 361-369.
(4) Fleming, I.; Barbero, A.; Walter, D. Chem. ReV. 1997, 97, 2063-2192.
(5) (a) Siebuth, S. McN.; Chen, C.-A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 311-322.
(b) Juers, D. H.; Kim, J.; Matthews, B. W.; Siebuth, S. McN.; Biochemistry
2005, 44, 16524-16528.
Figure 2. (A) Overview of compound signatures generated from screening
data. (B) Global view of 90 compound signatures based on composite
Z-scores derived from 41 biological assays, grouped based on assay type
(biological object). Color coding reflects the substitution of the isatin reagent.
(C) Signatures comparing the effect of varying appendage contexts, in this
case, iodo spirocycle (R)-7b, spirocycle (R)-9, and amido spirocycle (R)-
10. (D) Signatures comparing the effect of absolute stereochemistry for
triazole spirocycles (S)-11 and (R)-11. (E) Examples of EC50 values for
spirocycles (S)-12 and (R)-13 in growth inhibition assays with A549 cells
(assay #6) and HepG2 cells (assay #7). (R)- and (S)-Descriptors refer to
the stereochemistry of the chiral allylic silane from which the compounds
are derived. Ar ) anisyl.
(6) (a) Masse, C. E.; Panek, J. S. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 1293-1316. (b)
Chabaud, L.; James, P.; Landais, Y. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3173-
3199.
(7) Beresis, R. T.; Solomon, J. S.; Yang, M. G.; Jain, N. F.; Panek, J. S. Org.
Synth. 1998, 75, 78-88.
(8) (a) Daiss, J. O.; Penka, M.; Burschka, C.; Tacke, R. Organometallics 2004,
23, 4987-4994. (b) Utimoto, K.; Otake, Y.; Yoshino, H.; Kuwahara, E.;
Oshima, K.; Matsubara, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 74, 753-754.
(9) Marti, C.; Carreira, E. M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2209-2219.
(10) Nair, V.; Rajesh, C.; Dhanya, R.; Rath, N. P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43,
5349-5351.
(11) Tallarico, J. A.; Depew, K. M.; Pelish, H. E.; Westwood, N. J.; Lindsley,
C. W.; Shair, M. D.; Schreiber, S. L.; Foley, M. A. J. Comb. Chem. 2001,
3, 312-318.
(12) Klapars, A.; Huang, X.; Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
7421-7428.
(13) Screening was performed at the Broad Institute Chemical Biology
Screening Platform with duplicate experiments and mock treatment
(DMSO) control wells to determine the statistical significance of the
measurements. Refer to Figure S-1 and Table S-1 in the Supporting
Information for a summary of assay type and related disease biology.
(14) (a) Clemons, P. A. Unpublished results. Also see http://
DecisionSite 8.2; Spotfire, Inc.: Somerville, MA.
primary screening data from multiple assays, each compound was
independently assigned a composite Z-score (+ or -) corresponding
to the confidence of biological activity (gain or loss in signal relative
to DMSO control wells) and the reproducibility of duplicate
experiments.1,14
The composite Z-scores enable the generation of a high-feature,
biological signature for each silicon-containing compound (Figure
2A,B).14 These signatures reflect both the activity and selectivity
of these compounds across 41 assays and provide the means to
perform comparative analyses by a variety of mathematical
methods. Most importantly, they demonstrate a rich breadth of
(15) Refer to Figures S-3 and S-4 in the Supporting Information.
(16) Preliminary studies indicate that conversion of the arylsilane affords
compounds with reduced activity for the assays described here.
JA067552N
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 5, 2007 1021