approach to the octalactin core suffered from a number of
deficiencies: First, competitive epimerization of the R-methyl
group in the enone precursor was observed due to a relatively
slow rate of cyclization. Second, the cyclized material was
isolated in only a low yield, independent of the nature or
mol % of catalyst used, the reaction time, or temperature.
Finally, as an approach to a complex natural product such
as octalactin A, the macrolactonization of a fully function-
alized seco-aldehyde was not readily adaptable to a conver-
gent strategy, making it rather unattractive. For these reasons,
we sought to investigate an alternative approach to the
synthesis of medium-ring lactones, such as that found in
octalactin A.
Scheme 2. Eight-Membered Ring Lactone Synthesis Using an
Evans-Tishchenko-RCM Strategy
Of particular interest were a limited number of recent
reports of the application of ring-closing metathesis (RCM)
to the synthesis of these challenging medium-ring lac-
tones.6,7,8 If the RCM reaction could be used in combination
with the Evans-Tishchenko reaction as a fragment coupling
strategy (rather than as the means of lactonization), we
believed that we would be able to generate a highly
diastereoselective and convergent approach to the synthesis
of medium ring lactones. In order to test this hypothesis, we
first required verification that the Evans-Tishchenko reaction
could be successfully carried out using an unsaturated
aldehyde. We thus set out to develop a very simple model
of the octalactin core (Scheme 2). The required â-hydroxy
ketone substrate was prepared in three steps by sodium
borohydride reduction of 3-oxohex-5-enoate 4,9 conversion
to the Weinreb amide 5 and reaction of the amide with
methyl Grignard.10 Treatment of â-hydroxy ketone 6 with a
preformed samarium benzaldehyde pinacol adduct and pent-
4-enal gave the anti-diol monoester 7 in high yield (85%)
and with high diastereoselectivity (>95:5).11 On this simple
model significant acyl migration was observed to form an
undesired ester side product.12 However, it was found that
immediate protection of the free hydroxyl as the correspond-
ing silyl ether prevented this. Ring closure of the protected
ester 8, using G1 catalyst [PhCHdRuCl2(PCy3)2]13 at room
temperature overnight, gave the unsaturated lactone 9 in
quantitative yield. This simple lactone was found to be
somewhat unstable in the presence of any traces of the
ruthenium catalyst which remained after purification; in later
studies, these problems were negated by removal of ruthe-
nium from the reaction mixture through complexation with
DMSO.14
With these promising results in hand, a new retrosynthesis
of the octalactin core was envisaged (Scheme 3). In this
alternative route, key intermediate 10 was targeted. Success-
ful conversion of 10a (P ) TBS) to octalactin A has been
reported by Busek et al., through directed epoxidation of the
C(10)-C(11) double bond, oxidation of the C(9) alcohol to
the corresponding ketone, and deprotection of the silyl
ether,3b followed by hydrogenation of the oxecene double
bond and oxidative cleavage of the PMB protecting group.6b
We set out to synthesize the related compound 10b (P )
PMB)15 using our combined Evans-Tishchenko-RCM
approach. Retrosynthetic analysis of the metathesis precursor
11 led to the identification of two fragments: the C(1)-
C(5) unsaturated aldehyde 12 and â-hydroxy ketone 13,
which in turn was readily identified as the product of a
Horner-Wadsworth-Emmons (HWE) coupling of â-keto-
phosphonate 14 and C(11)-C(15) aldehyde 15. Synthesis
of the protected â-ketophosphonate 14 was facilitated by the
(4) For alternative approaches to the synthesis of medium ring lactones,
see: (a) O’Sullivan, P. T.; Buhr, W.; Fuhry, M. A. M.; Harrison, J. R.;
Davies, J. E.; Feeder, N.; Marshall, D. R.; Burton, J. W.; Holmes, A. B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2194-2207. (b) Pilli, R. A.; Victor, M. M.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2815-2818. (c) Ohi, H.; Inoue, S.; Iwabuchi,
Y.; Irie, H.; Hatakeyama, S. Synlett 1999, 1757-1759. (d) Inoue, S.;
Iwabuchi, Y.; Irie, H.; Hatakeyama, S. Synlett 1998, 735-736. (e) Bermejo,
A.; Tormo, J. R.; Cabedo, N.; Estornell, E.; Figadere, B.; Cortes, D. J.
Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 5158-5166. (f) Tapiolas, D. M.; Roman, M.; Fenical,
W.; Stout, T. J.; Clardy, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4682-4683.
(5) Hulme, A. N.; Howells, G. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 8245-
8248.
(6) RCM approaches to the synthesis of 8-membered ring lactones: (a)
Mohapatra, D. K.; Yellol, G. S. ArkiVoc 2003 (ix), 21-33. (b) Buszek, K.
R.; Sato, N.; Jeong, Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 181-184. (c) Chatterjee,
A. K.; Morgan, J. P.; Scholl, M.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 3783-3784.
(7) RCM approaches to the synthesis of 9-membered ring lactones: (a)
Takahashi, T.; Watanabe, H.; Kitahara, T. Heterocycles 2002, 58, 99-104.
(b) Baba, Y.; Saha, G.; Nakao, S.; Iwata, C.; Tanaka, T.; Ibuka, T.; Ohishi,
H.; Takemoto, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 81-88.
(8) RCM approaches to the synthesis of 10-membered ring lactones: (a)
Kangani, C. O.; Bru1ckner, A. M.; Curran, D. P. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 379-
382. (b) Davoli, P.; Spaggiari, A.; Castagnetti, L.; Prati, F. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2004, 2, 28-47. (c) Anand, R. V.; Baktharaman, S.; Singh, V. K. J.
Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 3356-3359. (d) Gurjar, M. K.; Nagaprasad, R.;
Ramana, C. V. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 2873-2875. (e) Diez, E.; Dixon,
D. J.; Ley, S. V.; Polara, A.; Rodriguez, F. Synlett 2003, 1186-1188. (f)
Liu, D.; Kozmin, S. A. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 3005-3007. (g) Fu¨rstner, A.;
Radkowski, K.; Wirtz, C.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. W.; Mynott, R. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 7061-7069.
(11) A preformed Sm(III) catalyst was used to prevent any side reactions
between the unsaturated aldehyde and Sm(II): Edmonds, D. J.; Johnston,
D.; Procter, D. J. Chem. ReV. 2004, 104, 3371-3403.
(12) Mahrwald, R. Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 1713-1723.
(13) Schwab, P.; Grubbs, R. H.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 100-110.
(14) Ahn, Y. M.; Yang, K.; Georg, G. I. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1411-
1413.
(15) It was anticipated that the differential protection of fragments 14
and 15 would allow a facile deprotection of the precursor to â-hydroxy
ketone 13, making 10b a more attractive target.
(9) Bennett, F.; Knight, D. W.; Fenton, G. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.
1 1991, 133-140.
(10) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815-3818.
632
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 4, 2007