Y. Hirokawa et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 19 (2009) 170–174
173
reduced by using the ( )-3-piperidinythio spacer (3A and 3B).
The in vivo efficacy of Type B as in 2B and 3B was more potent than
that of Type A as in 2A and 3A. Compound 4A bearing the pyrrolid-
inyl spacer exhibited in vitro antibacterial activity comparable to
that of 2A, while its in vivo efficacy was lower than that of 2A.
The in vitro antibacterial activity of the optically active derivatives
5A and 6A of 4A was very similar to that of 4A. On the other hand, R
configuration at the 3-position on the pyrrolidine ring, such as in
5A, increased the in vivo efficacy, while the S configuration (6A)
showed slightly worse efficacy. Although replacement of the pipe-
ridinyl spacer of 2A with an azetidinyl or a 2-morpholinyl spacer
(yielding 7A or 9A, respectively) caused a significant or slight de-
crease in in vitro and in vivo activities, the in vitro antibacterial
activity of 8A, containing the 4-piperidinylmethyl spacer, was
essentially the same as that of 2A. Compound 8A in vivo efficacy,
however, was weaker than that of 2A.
i)
33; Y = SO2, P1 = Boc, R1 = Et, P = H
34; Y = SO2, P1 = H, R1 = Et, P = H
25f
ii)
Scheme 3. Reagents and conditions: (i) MCPBA, CH2Cl2, rt, 24 h, 90%; (ii) 30% HCl/
EtOH, rt, 2 h, quant.
NH2
i)
35; Y = NH, P1 = Boc, R1 = CH=CH2, P = H
ii)
N
36; Y = NH, P1 = H, R1 = CH=CH2, P = H
Boc
Scheme 4. Reagents and conditions: (i) 18, K2CO3, NaI, MeCN, reflux, 16 h, 76%; (ii)
30% HCl/EtOH, rt, 2 h, quant.
As described in a previous paper,16 hydrogenation of the vinyl
group in the 12-position on the mutilin ring of 2A (giving an ethyl
group as in 10A) did not negatively affect the in vitro or in vivo
activity when compared to that of 2A. Replacement of the sulfur
atom in 2B by an oxygen atom, sulfone linkage, or nitrogen atom
(yielding 11B, 12B, or 13B, respectively) did not, in general, in-
crease the in vitro or in vivo activity. Furthermore, removal of
the methylene or ethylene moiety from the piperidine ring of 2B
provided the 3-methylaminopropylsufide 14B and 2-methylami-
noethylsulfide 15B, both of which exhibited very good in vitro anti-
bacterial activity against all strains with MIC values between 2 and
Me
NH
H
N
i)
37, 39; P1 = Boc
38, 40; P1 =
Me
ii)
N
Boc
N
Boc
H
Scheme 5. Reagents and conditions: (i) 18, K2CO3, NaI, MeCN, reflux, 16 h, (37; 97%,
39; 95%); (ii) 30% HCl/EtOH, rt, 2 h, quant.
60.004 lg/mL. In particular, compound 14B showed the most
favorable in vitro and in vivo activities in this series, while the
in vivo efficacy of 15B was less than that of 2B. Replacement of
the sulfur atom of 15B with a methylamino group (giving 16B)
considerably reduced both the vitro and in vivo activities. A similar
finding has been reported with the addition of a basic nitrogen in
the spacer.16 Quite surprisingly, formation of the piperazine ring
from 16B as in 17B led to a considerable increase in both the
in vitro and in vivo activities. Compound 17B as well as the 3-
methylaminopropylsulfide 14B conferred the highest in vivo effi-
cacy. The excellent in vivo efficacy of 14B and 17B, which also have
good solubility in water, may reflect improved pharmacokinetics
and ADME properties compared to derivatives 2A and 2B. Further
SARs of a novel series of pleuromutilin derivatives containing the
piperazine ring as a central spacer will be reported in due course.
With the purpose of finding novel antibacterial agents for use in
human, the new pleuromutilin analogues 2A and 2B with good sol-
ubility in water and excellent in vitro and in vivo activities were
identified. Modification of the sulfur-linked piperidinyl spacer of
2A and 2B resulted in the discovery of the novel pleuromutilin
derivatives 14B and 17B having the 3-methylaminopropylsulfide
and the piperazine ring, respectively, as a central spacer. Both com-
pounds showed much higher in vivo efficacy than the parent com-
R2
N
N
ii)
i)
N
3A-17B
R3
N
CO2H
41; R2 =
42; R2 =
R3 = NH2
N
N
N
Boc,
NHBoc
R3 = H
,
Scheme 6. Reagents and conditions: (i) 26a–e, 26g,h, 27c, 28c, 29f, 32, 34, 36, 38,
and 40, benzotriazole-1-yloxytris(pyrrolidino)phosphonium hexafluorophosphate,
Et3N, DMF, rt, 2 h; (ii) 30% HCl/EtOH, rt, 2 h.
pyogenes, Moraxella catarrhalis, and Haemophilus influenzae, all of
which are common serious respiratory tract pathogens. Further-
more, 3A–17B were evaluated for in vivo efficacy against S. aureus
Smith (MSSA) systemic infection model in mice. For comparison,
the previously reported pleuromutilin analogues8,9 2A and 2B were
used. All compounds were found to possess potent in vitro antibac-
terial activity against all strains (Table 1). In general, PSSP, PRSP,
and S. pyogenes strains were highly susceptible, while MRSA and
H. influenzae strains had somewhat higher MIC values. For these
derivatives, no significant differences in minimum inhibitory con-
centration (MIC) for drug-susceptible versus -resistant strains was
observed.
pound 2B and appeared to have
a well-balanced in vitro
antibacterial activity profile against MRSA, PRSP, VRE, S. pyogenes,
M. catarrhalis, and H. influenzae, all of which are known to cause
respiratory tract infections. The promising pleuromutilin deriva-
tives 14B and 17B may serve as useful lead compounds for the dis-
covery of new antibiotics.
Influence of the sulfide linkage of 2A and 2B on the antibacterial
activity was first examined. Compounds 3A and 3B, bearing the 3-
piperidinylthio ring as a central spacer, while keeping the mutilin
framework with its 2-amino-6-(piperazin-1-yl)purine (Type A) or
6-[( )-3-aminopyrrolidin-1-yl]purine (Type B) ring intact, showed
in vitro antibacterial activity practically comparable to that of 2A
and 2B against all strains, but no improvement in in vivo efficacy.
It was subsequently found that the direction of the connecting vec-
tor on the piperidine ring is important, since in vivo efficacy was
References and notes
1. Projan, S. J.; Youngman, P. J. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2002, 5, 463.
2. Livermore, D. M. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2003, 36, 1058.
3. Ohno, A. Infect. Control 2004, 13, 1012.
4. Hunt, E. Drug Future 2000, 25, 1163.
5. Anchel, M. J. Biol. Chem. 1952, 199, 133.
6. Arigoni, D. Gazz. Chim. Ital. 1962, 92, 884.
7. Birch, A. J.; Cameron, D. W.; Holzapfel, C. W.; Rihards, R. W. Chem. Ind. 1963,
374.