JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 2009 751
2H, Ch2Co2), 1.20(t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR(100 MHz,
CDCl3): 14.1(CH3), 29.8 (CH2CO2), 31.4(SCH2), 61.3 (CO2CH2),
125.2(C6H5), 126.8(C6H5), 129.0(C6H5), 136.4(C6H5), 173.1(CO2).
PhSCH2CH2CO2CH2CH2CH2CH3:29 IR(film) nmax(cm-1): 1732; 1H
NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz),7.20–7.39(m, 5H, C6H5), 4.10(q, J = 6.8 Hz,
2H, CO2CH2), 3.18(t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 2.64(t, J = 7.4 Hz,
2H, CH2CO2), 1.58–1.67(m, 2H, CH2CH2CH3), 1.33–1.43(m, 2H
CH2CH2CH3), 0.94(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): 13.7(CH2CH2CH3), 19.1(CH2CH2CH3), 29.1(CH2CH2CH3,
30.6(CH2CO2), 34.4(SCH2), 64.7(CO2CH2), 126.5(C6H5), 129.1
(C6H5), 130.1(C6H5), 135.2(C6H5), 171.9(CO2).
disulfides. Either electron-donating or electron-withdrawing
groups could be substituted leading to the desired products
in good yields. A detailed analysis of the results reveals that
the product yield of the methyl ethenyl ketones, in which the
carbonyl group has stronger electron withdrawing ability, is
higher than those of acrylic esters and acrylonitriles. Steric
hindrance an influence on the reaction. Compared with the
similar substrate unsubstituted at the b-position, the methyl
group substituted substrates required a little longer reaction
time to give a low yield. The size of the alkyl chain in the ester
group also had a significant influence, and as the alkyl chain
became longer, the products were obtained in lower yields.
Although further study is necessary to clarify the reaction
mechanism, thes results mentioned above suggest that this
reaction probably takes place through a reduction mechanism
as shown as following (Scheme 2).
The necessary use of zinc indicates the importance of
Cp2TiIIICl formation, which was actually observed in the
reaction mixture. Because the formation of Cp2TiCl(OH),
the Cp2TiCl2 cannot be regenerated at the final step. Two
equivalent of Cp2TiCl2 should be needed. Therefore, we tried
the reaction using a catalytic amount of Cp2TiCl2 and found
that the reaction actually proceeded inefficiently with only
10% yield of the desired product.
PhSCH2CH2CO2CH2(CH2)6CH3:30 IR(film)
n
max(cm-1): 1734;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.37–7.20(m, 5H, C6H5), 3.98(t,
J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CO2CH2), 3.15(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 2.65(d,
J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH2CO2), 1.59–1.54(m, 2H, CO2CH2CH2), 1.37–1.26
(m, 10H, CO2CH2CH2 (CH2)5CH3), 0.91(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): 11.3(CH3), 14.3(CH2CH3), 23.6
(CH2CH2CH3), 23.9 (CH2CH2CH2CH3), 28.6(CO2CH2CH2CH2CH2),
29.6(CO2CH2CH2CH2), 31.2 (CO2CH2CH2), 34.6(CH2CO2), 38.9
(SCH2), 67.3(CO2CH2), 126.8(C6H5), 128.9(C6H5), 130.5(C6H5),
135.6(C6H5), 172.3(CO2).
PhS(CH3)CHCH2CO2CH2CH3:30 IR(film)
n
max(cm-1): 1735;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.42–7.45(m, 2H, C6H5), 7.23–7.32(m,
3H, C6H5), 4.12(q, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, CO2CH2), 3.58–3.64(m, 1H, CH),
2.62(dd, J = 6.0 Hz, 15.4 Hz, 1H, 1/2CH2CO2, 2.43(dd, J = 6.0 Hz,
15.4 Hz, 1H, 1/2CH2CO2), 1.32(d, J = 6.4 Hz, 3H, PhS(CH3)
CH), 1.25(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CO2CH2CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
CDCl3): 14.2(CO2CH2CH3), 20.9(PhS(CH3)CH), 39.5(CH2CO2),
41.9(CH), 60.6(CO2CH2), 127.4(C6H5), 128.9(C6H5), 132.9(C6H5),
133.9(C6H5), 171.4(CO2).
In summary, we have developed a highly efficient method
for the reductive cleavage of S–S bond and applied it to
the synthesis of b-arylthiocarbonyl and b-thio compounds.
It has various merits such as air-stable starting materials, mild
and neutral reaction conditions, convenient manipulation and
good yields.
p-ClC6H4SCH2CH2CO2CH2CH3:5 IR(KBr)
n
max(cm-1): 1731;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.26–7.32(m, 4H, p-ClC6H4), 4.15(q,
J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, CO2CH2), 3.14(t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, SCH2CH2), 2.60(t,
J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, SCH2CH2), 1.26(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H, CH3); 13C NMR
(100 MHz,CDCl3): 14.2(CH3), 29.3 (SCH2CH2), 34.3(SCH2),
60.8(CO2CH2), 129.1(C6H4), 131.5(C6H4), 132.6(C6H4), 133.8
(C6H4), 171.6(CO2).
Experimental
1H NMR were recorded on INOVA-400 spectrometer, using CDCl3
as the solvent with TMS as an internal standard; IR spectra were
determined on Perkin-Elmer 683 spectrophotometer; tetrahydrofuran
was distilled from sodium benzophenone. Zinc was activated by
dilute acid followed by washing with water and drying.
p-CH3C6H4SCH2CH2CO2CH2CH3:5 IR(film) nmax(cm-1): 1732;
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.32(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, C6H4), 7.19(d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, C6H4), 4.15(q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H, CO2CH2), 3.13(t,
J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, SCH2CH2), 2.62(t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, SCH2CH2), 2.35(s,
3H, p-CH3C6H4), 1.26(t, J = 7.2 Hz, 3H, CH2CH3); 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3): 14.2(CH2CH3), 21.1(p-CH3C6H4), 29.8(SCH2CH2),
34.5(SCH2), 60.7(CO2CH2), 129.8(C6H4), 131.0(C6H4), 131.1(C6H4),
136.8(C6H4), 171.8(CO2).
Typical procedure: To a solution of Cp2TiCl2 (0.25 g, 1.0 mmol) in
dry THF (6.0 mL) was added Zn dust (0.13 g, 2.0 mmol). The resulted
mixture was stirred at room temperature under a N2 atmosphere
for 1.0 h. Then the disulfide (0.5 mmol) was added to the reaction
mixture and the solution became a deep red colour. After that, acrylic
esters or acrylnitriles or methyl ethenyl ketone (1.0 mmol) was
added and resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature under
a N2 atmosphere for a period of time listed in Table 1. Then dilute
hydrochloric acid (20 mL. 1.2 M) was added, after usual work-up,
the products were purified by preparative TLC on silica gel using
light petroleum-ether as eluent (30:1).
p-CH3OC6H4SCH2CH2CO2CH2CH3:5 IR(film) nmax(cm-1) 1736.
1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.36(d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, C6H4), 6.86(d,
J = 8.0 Hz, 2H, C6H4), 4.20(q, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CO2CH2), 3.80(s, 3H,
OCH3), 3.12(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, SCH2CH2), 2.61(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H,
SCH2CH2), 1.21(t, J = 6.8 Hz 3H, CH2CH3); 13C NMR(100 MHz,
CDCl3): 14.3(CH3), 31.6(SCH2CH2), 34.8(SCH2CH2), 55.8(OCH3),
61.6(CO2CH2), 114.6(C6H4), 125.8(C6H4), 134.6(C6H4), 159.8
(C6H4), 171.3(CO2).
1
PhSCH2CH2CO2CH3:25 IR(film)nmax(cm-1) 1735; H NMR (CDCl3,
PhSCH2CH2CN:4 IR(film) nmax(cm-1): 2250; 1H NMR (CDCl3,
400 MHz), 7.25–7.45(m, 5H, C6H5), 3.15(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, SCH2),
2.55(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, CH2CN) 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3):
18.3(CH2CN), 30.2(SCH2), 118.1(CN), 127.8(C6H5), 129.4(C6H5),
131.4(C6H5), 133.2(C6H5).
400 MHz) 7.20–7.35(m, 5H, C6H5), 3.70(s, 3H, CH3), 3.10(t, J = 7.3 Hz,
2H, PhCH2), 2.70(t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H, CH2CO); 13C NMR(100 MHz,
CDCl3) 28.7 (SCH2CH2), 33.4(SCH2), 63.2(CO2CH3), 126.8(C6H5),
128.3(C6H5), 132.4(C6H5), 134.2(C6H5), 173.2(CO2).
PhSCH2CH2CO2CH2CH3:3 IR(film) nmax(cm-1) 1732; 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.20–7.45(m, 5H, C6H5), 4.20(q, J = 7.2 Hz,
2H, CO2CH2), 3.13(t, J = 7.0 Hz, 2H, SCH2), 2.63(t, J = 7.0 Hz,
p-ClC6H4SCH2CH2CN:4 IR(film) nmax(cm-1): 2244; 1H NMR
(CDCl3, 400 MHz), 7.27–7.37(m, 4H, C6H4), 3.11(t, J = 6.8 Hz,
2H, SCH2), 2.59(t, J = 6.8 Hz, 2H, CH2CN); 13C NMR (100 MHz,
2 Cp2TiIIICl
ZnCl2
2 Cp2TiIVCl2
+
+
Zn
2 Cp2TiIIICl
2 Cp2TiClSAr
+ ArSSAr
X
Y
ArS
Y
Cp2TiClSR1
X
+
+
Y
Cp2TiCl
X
Y
H2O
+
Cp2TiCl(OH)
X
ArS
ArS
Cp2TiCl
Scheme 2 Proposed mechanism for the synthesis of b-arylthio compounds promoted by the Cp2TiCl2/Zn system.
PAPER: JC090762
JCR_12_2009 Book.indb 751
11/12/2009 15:36