the first example of the Rh(NHC)-catalyzed O-aryla-
tion of aryl bromides.
ligand alone was ineffective (entry 3), the combined use of
NHC and phosphine ligands did not furnish more enhanced
results (entry 4) compared to the conditions using the ICy
NHC ligand alone (entry 2).
Not surprisingly, the type of employed rhodium pre-
cursors was highly important for an efficient O-arylation
as seen in entry 5. A prolonged reaction time increased the
product yield (entry 6). Using Rh2(OAc)4 as a metal
precursor, various NHCs were subsequently screened to
reveal that, as anticipated, N-substituents of the imidazo-
lium skeleton significantly influenced the efficiency. For
instance, the introduction of bulkier N-substituents such as
It-Bu or IAd resulted in an inhibition of the reaction
(entries 7 and 8, respectively). In addition, the use of IMes
in combination with Rh2(OAc)4, one of our successful
systems utilized in the CꢀC bond formation,9b was also
ineffective (entry 9).
Interestingly, an NHC ligand (Cy2-bimy) derived from
benzimidazolium salts was determined to be more effective
than the corresponding imidazolyl derivative (compare
entries 10 and 6). It should be noted that the benzimida-
zolium salts are readily prepared as a stable solid in one
step starting from the corresponding benzimidazoles.11a
Considering the fact that NHCs derived from benzimida-
zolium salts have rarely been utilized in transitions metal
catalysis,11 the present result would provide important
insight for further investigations of NHCs in other reac-
tions. While a monomeric Rh-NHC species12 obtained
from the use of [RhCl(cod)]2 instead of Rh2(OAc)4 in
combination with the Cy2-bimy ligand provided only a
moderate yield (entry 11), another NHC derived from an
iPr2-benzimidazolium skeleton was more promising (e.g.,
entry 12).13
Table 1. Optimization of the Reaction Conditionsa
entry
catalytic systems
Rh2(OAc)4
t (h)
yield (%)b
1
24
12
12
12
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
0
50
0
2
Rh2(OAc)4 þ ICy HBF4
3
3
Rh2(OAc)4 þ PCy3
4
Rh2(OAc)4 þ ICy HBF4 þ PCy3
55
0
3
5
RhCl3 þ ICy HBF4
3
6
Rh2(OAc)4 þ ICy HBF4
70
0
3
7
Rh2(OAc)4 þ It-Bu HCl
3
8
Rh2(OAc)4 þ IAd HCl
0
3
9
Rh2(OAc)4 þ IMes HCl
0
3
10
11
12
13c
Rh2(OAc)4 þ Cy2-bimy HPF6
95
40
66
95
3
[RhCl(cod)]2 þ Cy2-bimy HPF6
3
[RhCl(cod)]2 þ iPr2-bimy HBr
3
Rh2(OAc)4 þ Cy2-bimy HPF6 þ
3
AgPF6
14c
15d
[RhCl(cod)]2 þ iPr2-bimy HBr þ
24
24
95
93
3
AgSbF6
Rh(cod)(iPr2-bimy)Br þ AgSbF6
a Conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), 2 (0.3 mmol), rhodium catalyst
(10 mol %), NHC ligand (2 equiv to Rh), t-BuONa (2 equiv to 1),
and toluene (0.2 mL). b 1H NMR yield (internal standard: 1,1,2,
2-tetrachloroethane). c Rhodium catalyst (3 mol %), NHC ligand
(10 mol %), AgPF6 (10 mol %). d 5 mol % of Rh-NHC and 10 mol %
of Ag salt were employed.
Using bromobenzene (1a) and 4-methoxyphenol (2a) as
coupling partners, optimization of the intermolecular
O-arylation procedure was first investigated (Table 1).
While the reaction was completely ineffective uisng only
the Rh2(OAc)4 catalyst (10 mol %) in the absence of ligands
(entry 1), the addition of certain NHC ligands provided
much improved results. For instance, an NHC ligand
derived from N,N-dicyclohexylimidazolium accelerated the
O-arylation reaction to afford (4-methoxyphenyl)-phenyl
ether (3a) in 50% NMR yield (entry 2). While a phosphine
Figure 1. Crystallographic structure of Rh(cod)(iPr2-bimy)Br.
It was observed that cationic Rh species generated in situ
by the addition of a silver species into the reaction mixture
was highly active,14 giving excellent product yields even
(9) (a) Kim, M.; Lee, J.; Lee, H.-Y.; Chang, S. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 1807. (b) Kim, M.; Kwak, J.; Chang, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 8935. (c) Kim, M.; Chang, S. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1640. (d)
Kwak, J.; Kim, M.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 3780.
(10) (a) Lee, J. M.; Na, Y.; Han, H.; Chang, S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004,
33, 302. (b) Cho, S. H.; Hwang, S. J.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 9254. (c) Hwang, S. J.; Cho, S. H.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2008, 130, 16158. (d) Hwang, S. J.; Kim, H. J.; Chang, S. Org. Lett. 2009,
11, 4588. (e) Cho, S. H.; Kim, J. Y.; Lee, S. Y.; Chang, S. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9127. (f) Kim, J. Y.; Cho, S. H.; Joseph, J.; Chang, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9899. (g) Kim, S. H.; Chang, S. Org.
Lett. 2010, 12, 1868. (h) Kim, J.; Chang, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
10272.
(11) (a) Huynh, H. V.; Han, Y.; Ho, J. H. H.; Tan, G. K. Organo-
metallics 2006, 25, 3267. (b) Gung, B. W.; Bailey, L. N.; Craft, D. T.;
Barnes, C. L.; Kirschbaum, K. Organometallics 2010, 29, 3450.
(12) The structure of isolated Rh(cod)(NHC) complexes has been
€
characterized: (a) Turkmen, H.; Pape, T.; Hahn, F. E.; C-etinkaya, B.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 5418. (b) Li, J.; Stewart, I. C.; Grubbs, R. H.
Organometallics 2010, 29, 3765.
(13) Gaillard, S.; Nun, P.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Nolan, S. P. Organome-
tallics 2010, 29, 5402.
Org. Lett., Vol. 13, No. 9, 2011
2369