3346
T. Tashiro et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 48 (2007) 3343–3347
References and notes
1. Morita, M.; Motoki, K.; Akimoto, K.; Natori, T.; Sakai,
T.; Sawa, E.; Yamaji, K.; Koezuka, Y.; Kobayashi, E.;
Fukushima, H. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 2176–2187.
2. Natori, T.; Koezuka, Y.; Higa, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993,
34, 5591–5592.
3. Natori, T.; Morita, M.; Akimoto, K.; Koezuka, Y.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2771–2776.
4. Kawano, T.; Cui, J.; Koezuka, Y.; Toura, I.; Kaneko, Y.;
Motoki, K.; Ueno, H.; Nakagawa, R.; Sato, H.; Kondo,
E.; Koseki, H.; Taniguchi, M. Science 1997, 278, 1626–
1629.
5. Wu, D.; Xing, G.-W.; Poles, M. A.; Horowitz, A.; Kinjo,
Y.; Sullivan, B.; Bodmer-Narkevitch, V.; Plettenburg, O.;
Kronenberg, M.; Tsuji, M.; Ho, D. D.; Wong, C.-H. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102, 1351–1356.
6. Rissoan, M.-C.; Soumelis, V.; Kadowaki, N.; Grouard,
G.; Briere, F.; Malefyt, R. de W.; Liu, Y.-J. Science 1999,
283, 1183–1186.
Figure 3. The docking model of mCD1d-KRN7000 (1, purple) and
mCD1d-RCAI-56 (3, yellow).
7. Savage, P. B.; Teyton, L.; Bendelac, A. Chem. Soc. Rev.
2006, 35, 771–779.
8. Franck, R. W.; Tsuji, M. Acc. Chem. Res. 2006, 39, 692–
701.
9. Berkers, C. R.; Ovaa, H. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2005, 26,
252–257.
bioactivities in vivo of a-C-GalCer (2) with 1 or 3 will be
reported elsewhere.
10. Schmieg, J.; Yang, G.; Franck, R. W.; Tsuji, M. J. Exp.
Med. 2003, 198, 1631–1641.
2.5. Docking model of mouse(m)CD1d-RCAI-56 complex
11. Yang, G.; Schmieg, J.; Tsuji, M.; Franck, R. W. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3818–3822.
12. Chen, G.; Schmieg, J.; Tsuji, M.; Franck, R. W. Org. Lett.
2004, 6, 4077–4080.
13. Wipf, P.; Pierce, J. G. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3375–3378.
14. Zajonc, D. M.; Cantu, C., III; Mattner, J.; Zhou, D.;
Savage, P. B.; Bendelac, A.; Wilson, I. A.; Teyton, L. Nat.
Immunol. 2005, 6, 810–818.
15. Koch, M.; Stronge, V. S.; Shepherd, D.; Gadola, S. D.;
Mathew, B.; Ritter, G.; Fersht, A. R.; Besra, G. S.;
Schmidt, R. R.; Jones, E. Y.; Cerundolo, V. Nat. Immunol.
2005, 6, 819–826.
Comparison between the computational docking mod-
els25 of mCD1d-KRN7000(1) and mCD1d-RCAI-56(3)
complexes are depicted in Figure 3. As can be seen in
the figure, the binding conformations of 1 and 3 are
not so different. The ligand binding score (Glide Score)26
of the CD1d-ligand complexes were also calculated as
ꢀ18.97 for 1 and ꢀ19.12 for 3. Presence of the O atom
between the carba-sugar and the ceramide of 3 therefore
keeps the structure of mCD1d-3 complex almost as
same as that of the complex with 1. This means that
the stability of the connecting ether linkage together
with the absence of the pyranose O atom must have
caused the remarkable Th1 bias of RCAI-56 (3) in its
ability to induce cytokine release.
16. Yu, S.-H.; Park, J.-J.; Chung, S.-K. Tetrahedron: Asym-
metry 2006, 17, 3030–3036.
17. Sun, C.; Bittman, R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7694–7699.
18. Das, S. K.; Mallet, J.-M.; Sinay, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
¨
1997, 36, 493–496.
19. Iimori, T.; Takahashi, H.; Ikegami, S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1996, 37, 649–652.
3. Conclusion
20. Ko, K.-S.; Zea, C. J.; Pohl, N. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 13188–13189.
1
21. The H, and 13C NMR spectra of 11 were identical with
In conclusion, we developed RCAI-56 (3), a new carba-
a-D-galactose analogue of KRN7000. RCAI-56 (3) is a
remarkably potent inducer of Th1 biased cytokine pro-
duction in vivo. Further studies are in progress to clarify
the structural requirements for a glycosphingolipid
ligand in controlling the ratio of Th1/Th2 responses.
those reported by Chung.16
22. Heidelberg, T.; Martin, O. R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69,
2290–2301.
23
1
23. Mp 147–149 °C; ½aꢁD +27.8 (c 0.32, pyridine); H NMR
of (400 MHz, pyridine-d5, 25 °C): d = 8.43 (d,
3
J = 8.4 Hz, 1H, NH), 6.85–6.82 (m, 1H, OH), 6.37 (d,
J = 6.4 Hz, 1H, OH), 6.31–6.28 (m, 1H, OH), 6.07 (d, J =
5.2 Hz, 1H, OH), 6.00–5.98 (m, 1H, OH), 5.97 (t,
J = 5.4 Hz, 1H, OH), 5.21–5.18 (m, 1H, 2H), 4.69 (br s,
1H, 400-H), 4.50 (dd, J = 10, 4.0 Hz, 1H, 1-Ha), 4.47–4.43
(m, 1H, 200-H), 4.34–4.18 (m, 5H, 3-, 4-, 100-, 300-H, 600-Ha),
4.26 (dd, J = 10, 5.2 Hz, 1H, 1-Hb), 4.00 (ddd-like,
J = 9.6, 5.4, 4.8 Hz, 1H, 600-Hb), 2.51–2.42 (m, 1H, 500-
H), 2.44 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, 20-H2), 2.33–2.24 (m, 1H, 5-
Ha), 2.14–2.06 (m, 1H, 5a00-Ha), 2.00 (br t, J = 13 Hz, 1H,
5a00-Hb), 1.98–1.84 (m, 2H, 5-Hb, 6-Ha), 1.82 (quint.-like,
J = 7.6 Hz, 2H, 30-H2), 1.76–1.67 (m, 1H, 6-Hb), 1.50–1.17
(m, 66H, 7-, 8-, 9-, 10-, 11-, 12-, 13-, 14-, 15-, 16-, 17-, 40-,
50-, 60-, 70-, 80-, 90-, 100-, 110-, 120-, 130-, 140-, 150-, 160-,
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr. K. Seino and Mr. H. Kamijuku
at St. Marianna University School of Medicine for their
preliminary contribution in bioassay. We thank Ms. K.
Utsunomiya for her technical support. Our thanks are
due to Professor H. Watanabe and Dr. K. Ishigami
(the University of Tokyo), and also Drs. K. Fuhshuku
and M. Shiozaki (RIKEN Research Center for Allergy
and Immunology) for their helpful comments.