comparison, application of this methodology to heterocycle
construction has been limited, with just one report of a [5 +
1] annulation route to piperidines having been described.5
In view of the convergent and modular nature of these
transformations, we were drawn to the prospect of utilizing
double Michael reactions of alkynones in a concise synthesis
of highly functionalized pyroglutamic derivatives, according
to the strategy outlined in Scheme 1. It was hoped that under
Scheme 1. Proposed Double Michael Addition Route to
Pyroglutamic Acid Derivatives
Figure 1. X-ray crystal structure of double Michael product 8.
that the small size of the nitrile group reduces the magnitude
of unfavorable 1,3-diaxial interactions between acidifying
groups in the transition state for cyclization, which would
otherwise inhibit ring closure.4i At the outset of this work, it
was therefore uncertain whether diacid 7a, which does not
possess a nitrile substituent, would undergo successful double
Michael reaction. Although treatment of a mixture of 7a and
3a with PPh3 in acetonitrile4c gave no reaction (entry 1), we
4a
found that KOtBu in CH2Cl2 led to the formation of the
suitable conditions, an amide-tethered diacid 2 would react
with an alkynone 3 to first give mono-Michael adduct 4 and/
or 5, which would then cyclize to the pyroglutamic acid
derivative 6.
Our preliminary investigations began with the double
Michael reaction of amide-tethered diacid 7a with aromatic
alkynone 3a (Table 1). In all previous examples of double
Michael reactions reported by Grossman and co-workers,4,5
a mandatory requirement for success is the presence of at
least one nitrile substituent in the tethered diacid, which ends
up in a pseudoaxial position in the product.4i It is proposed
desired pyroglutamic acid derivative 8, albeit as a 1:1 mixture
of diastereomers (entry 2).
We next investigated the effect of Lewis acidic additives
7
on the reaction.6 Substoichiometric quantities of Fe(acac)3
8
and Zn(OTf)2 were found to inhibit the reaction (entries 3
and 4), though Zn(OTf)2 had a beneficial effect on di-
9
astereoselectivity (entry 4). Finally, we identified Mg(OTf)2
10
(entry 5) and Ni(acac)2 (entry 6) as promising additives,
allowing double Michael product 8 to be isolated in 68-
76% yield and with up to 18:1 diastereomeric ratio.
Recrystallization of 8 from a mixture of diethyl ether and
hexane afforded crystals that were suitable for X-ray crystal-
lography, which allowed us to confirm that the major
diastereomer obtained in these reactions possesses trans
stereochemistry (Figure 1).
Table 1. Reaction Condition Optimization
With optimized conditions in hand, the scope of the
reaction was explored (Figure 2). Using 7a as the tethered
(6) For a review of transition-metal-catalyzed Michael reactions of 1,3-
dicarbonyl compounds, see: Christoffers, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 1259-
1266.
yield
(7) For examples of iron-catalyzed Michael reactions of 1,3-dicarbonyl
compounds, see: (a) Fei, C. P.; Chan, T. H. Synthesis 1982, 467-468. (b)
Kocˇovksy´, P.; Dvorˇa´k, D. Tetrahedron. Lett. 1986, 27, 5015-5108. (c)
Christoffers, J. Chem. Commun. 1997, 943-944. (d) Christoffers, J. J. Chem.
Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1997, 3141-3149. (e) Christoffers, J. Synlett 2001,
723-732.
(8) For examples of zinc-catalyzed Michael reactions of 1,3-dicarbonyl
compounds, see: Brunner, H.; Krumey, C. J. Mol. Catal. A 1999, 142,
7-15.
entry
reagents
dra
n/a
1:1
1:1
>19:1
11:1
18:1
(%)b
1c
2
3
4
5
6
PPh3 (20 mol %)
0
68
31
27
68
76
KOtBu (20 mol %)
KOtBu (20 mol %), Fe(acac)3 (20 mol %)
KOtBu (20 mol %), Zn(OTf)2 (20 mol %)
KOtBu (20 mol %), Mg(OTf)2 (20 mol %)
KOtBu (20 mol %), Ni(acac)2 (20 mol %)
(9) For examples of magnesium-catalyzed Michael reactions of 1,3-
dicarbonyl compounds, see: (a) Ji, J.; Barnes, D. M.; Zhang, J.; King, S.
A.; Wittenberger, S. J.; Morton, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10215-
10216. (b) Barnes, D. M.; Ji, J.; Fickes, M. G.; Fitzgerald, M. A.; King, S.
A.; Morton, H. E.; Plagge, F. A.; Preskill, M.; Wagaw, S. H.; Wittenberger,
S. J.; Zhang, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13097-13105. (c)
MacCulloch, A. C.; Yolka, S.; Jackson, R. F. W. Synlett 2002, 1700-1702.
a As determined by 1H NMR analysis of the isolated product. Due to
overlapping signals from other compounds, diastereomeric ratios could not
be determined from 1H NMR analysis of the unpurified reaction mixtures.
b Isolated yields of mixtures of diastereoisomers that were inseparable by
column chromatography. c MeCN used as solvent in place of CH2Cl2.
2160
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 11, 2007