up to 10.3:1 for maltose, which probably reflects differences in
anomerization rates of the transient chlorothioformamides.
Experimental Section
General Procedure for the Preparation of Glycosyl Isothio-
cyanates 3 and 20-26 from Glycooxazolines. To a heterogeneous
mixture of the corresponding oxazoline derivative 6 and 13-19
(see refs 12 and 13 and the Supporting Information) in CH2Cl2-
H2O (1:1, 5 mL per 100 mg of reacting oxazoline) were added
CaCO3 (3 equiv), CuCl2‚2H2O (1.5 equiv), and CSCl2 (1.5 equiv).
The mixture was vigorously stirred for the indicated time (Tables
1 and 2) in a round-bottomed flask provided with a system for
evacuation of gases and then filtered (CAUTION: use a well-
ventilated hood). The organic layer was separated, washed with
water, dried (MgSO4), and concentrated to dryness. The resulting
residue was purified by column chromatography using the eluent
indicated in each case.
The above copper(II)-mediated reversion of the anomeric
stereoselectivity is remarkable. For the D-galactopyranosyl
isothiocyanate 20, a R/â ratio ranging from 1:9 to 1:8 has been
previously reported from the reaction of the corresponding
peracetylated glycosyl bromide with potassium thiocyanate or
trimethylsilyl isothiocyanate.7a,b The 3.3:1 ratio obtained from
galactooxazoline 13 implies a 25-30-fold increase in the
R-selectivity. In the case of the D-gluco derivative 3 and the
disaccharide isothiocyanates 21-23, the R-anomers had not been
detected before. Interestingly, the isothiocyanation step can be
effected on the crude oxazoline precursor (see the Supporting
Information), thereby avoiding yield losses due to hydrolysis
during column chromatography purification. Globally, this
methodology allows the one-pot transformation of a per-O-
acetyl-â-glycopyranosyl azide into the corresponding â- or
R-glycopyranosyl isothiocyanate.
In order to expand the repertoire of the approach, the
transformations of the D-glucofuranose (17) and D-fructopyra-
nose oxazolines (18 and 19) into glycosyl isothiocyanates were
next examined (Table 2, entries 9-12). Compound 17 afforded
a mixture of the R- and â-D-glucofuranosyl isothiocyanates 24R
and 24â upon reaction with thiophosgene, the R/â relative
proportion increasing from 1.3:1 to 2:1 in the presence of
copper(II) chloride. For the fructose derivatives 18 and 19 the
isothiocyanation reaction proceeded with retention of the
anomeric configuration, independently of the presence or
absence of the copper(II) additive, to give the corresponding
â-fructopyranosyl isothiocyanates 25 or 26. In both cases, the
vicinal coupling constants around the pyranoid ring were
consistent with the 2C5 conformation, which is consistent with
that reported in the literature for â-D-fructopyronsyl derivatives
bearing nitrogen substituents.17 The absence of NOE contacts
between the H-1 and H-6axial protons further supports the axial
orientation of the NCS group.
The relatively high proportion of 24R in the reaction mixture
of 17 with thiophosgene is consistent with the expected weaker
contribution of the reverse anomeric effect in the transient
furanoid chlorothioformamide as compared with pyranoid
derivatives. On the other hand, anomerization processes are
faster for five-membered rings, which is probably responsible
for the lower increase in the 24R/24â ratio in he presence of
copper(II). In the fructose series, the R-configuration would
imply either the axial orientation of the bulky carbon substituent
(C-1) or the inversion of the chair conformation, both being
unfavorable arrangements.
In conclusion, a robust and flexible methodology for the prepa-
ration of acylated glycosyl isothiocyanates from N-glycooxazo-
line precursors is reported. The preference for the R- or
â-configuration in the final compounds can be tuned, to some
extent, by using copper(II) chloride as an additive. Noteworthy,
the strategy allows the global transformation of â-glycopyra-
nosyl azides into a-glycopyranosyl isothiocyanates with axial-
equatorial 1,2-cis dispositions. Further endeavors will include
reactivity experiments and neoglycoconjugate synthesis.
In the absence of CuCl2, the above procedure afforded exclu-
sively the â-anomer, except for the glucofuranosyl oxazoline
derivative 17, which led to a 57:43 24R/24â mixture (Table 2).
2,3,4,6-Tetra-O-acetyl-R-D-glucopyranosyl Isothiocyanate (3R).
Compound 3R (92 mg, 49%) was obtained, together with 3â (61
mg, 34%), by isothiocyanation of 6 (160 mg, 0.49 mmol) in the
presence of CuCl2 after column chromatography using 1:2 EtOAc-
petroleum ether: Rf (3R) ) 0.55 (1:1 EtOAc-petroleum ether); Rf
(3â) ) 0.46 (1:1 EtOAc-petroleum ether). The spectroscopic and
physicochemical data of 3â were identical to those reported in the
literature.1 The R-anomer 3R, isolated as an amorphous solid, had
[R]D ) +125 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2). IR (KBr): νmax 2956, 2014, 1755,
1433, 911 cm-1. 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 5.81 (d, 1
H, J1,2 ) 4.5 Hz, H-1), 5.39 (t, 1 H, J2,3 ) J3,4 ) 9.6 Hz, H-3),
5.10 (t, 1 H, J4,5 ) 9.6 Hz, H-4), 5.01 (dd, 1 H, H-2), 4.24 (dd, 1
H, J6a,6b ) 12.9 Hz, J5,6a ) 4.8 Hz, H-6a), 4.10 (dd, 1 H, J5,6b
)
2.4 Hz, H-6b), 4.09 (ddd, 1 H, H-5), 2.09, 2.07, 2.06, 2.05 (4 s, 12
H, 4 MeCO). 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 169.8-170.5
(4 CO), 144.7 (NCS), 81.9 (C-1), 70.5 (C-3, C-5), 69.8 (C-2), 67.5
(C-4), 61.2 (C-6), 20.6 (MeCO). ESIMS: m/z ) 428 ([M + K]+),
412 ([M + Na]+). Anal. Calcd for C15H19NO9S: C, 46.27; H, 4.92;
N, 3.60. Found: C, 46.08; H, 4.87; N, 3.65.
N-Benzyl-N′-(2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-R-D-glucopyranosyl)thio-
urea (12R). A solution of 3R (115 mg, 0.295 mmol), benzylamine
hydrochloride (47.2 mg, 1.1 equiv), and DIPEA (37 µL, 1.1 equiv)
in CH2Cl2 (3.5 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 3 h. Solvent
was removed, and the resulting residue was purified by column
chromatography (1:2 EtOAc-petroleum ether) to give 12R (93 mg,
72%) as an amorphous solid. Rf ) 0.27 (1:1 EtOAc-petroleum
ether). [R]D: +135 (c 1.0, CH2Cl2). UV (CH2Cl2): λmax 256 nm,
(ꢀmm ) 8.5). IR (KBr): νmax 3367, 1749, 1536, 1223, 1036 cm-1
.
1HNMR(500MHz, CDCl3, 313K):δ(ppm)7.34-7.26(m, 5H, Ph),
7.05 (bt, 1 H, JNH,H ) 5.5 Hz, N′H), 6.43 (bs, 1 H, NH), 5.45 (bt,
1H, H-1), 5.29(t, 1H, J2,3 )J3,4 )10.0Hz, H-3), 5.01(dd, 1H, J1,2
)
5.0 Hz, H-2), 4.97 (t, 1H, J4,5 ) 11.5 Hz, H-4), 4.81 (dd, 1 H,
2JH,H ) 15.0 Hz, CHPh), 4.73 (dd, 1 H, CHPh), 4.07 (dd, 1 H, J5,6a
) 5.5, J6a,6b ) 12.5 Hz, H-6a), 4.03 (ddd, 1 H, H-5), 3.89 (dd, 1
H, J5,6b ) 2.0 Hz, H-6b), 2.11, 2.02, 1.97, 1.96 (4 s, 12 H, 4 MeCO).
13CNMR(125.7MHz,CDCl3,323K): δ(ppm)184.8(CS),170.1-169.0
(4CO),137.0-127.6(Ph),78.8(C-1),69.8(C-2),68.6(C-3),68.1(C-4,5),
61.7 (C-6), 49.8 (CH2), 20.4-20.2 (MeCO). ESIMS: m/z ) 535
([M + Na]+), 497 ([M + H]+). Anal. Calcd for C22H28N2O9S: C,
53.22; H, 5.68; N, 5.64. Found: C, 53.21; H, 5.55; N, 5.52.
Acknowledgment. We thank the Spanish Ministerio de
Educacio´n y Ciencia for financial support (contract nos.
CTQ2006-15515-C02-01/BQU and CTQ2004-05854/BQU) and
the Erasmus program for a fellowship (to B.S.).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures,
compound characterization data, and copies of the 1H and 13C NMR
spectra for the new compounds. This material is available free of
(17) (a) Yano, S.; Takizawa, S.; Sugita, H.; Takahashi, T.; Shioi, H.;
Tsubomura, T.; Yoshikawa, S. Carbohydr. Res. 1985, 142, 179-183. (b)
Harrowfield, J. M.; Mocerino, M.; Skelton B. W.; Wey W. Y.; White, A.
H. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1995, 783-797. (c) Lichtenthaler, F. W.
Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 313, 69-89. (d) Tatibou¨et, A.; Lawrence, S.; Rollin,
P.; Holman, G. D. Synlett 2004, 1945-1948.
JO062419Z
4550 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 72, No. 12, 2007