178
J. Li et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1012 (2012) 177–181
O
O
O
OHC
CHO
NCCH2COOH
R
R
AcOH, Piperidine
EtOH, Piperidine
O
O
O
CHO
1a-1d
2a-2d
CN
COOH
a: R=H;
b: R=4-OH
O
c: R=8-OCH3; d: R=7-N(CH3)2
R
O
O
3a-3d
Scheme 1. Synthetic routes to compounds 3a–3d.
cooled to room temperature. The precipitate was collected via fil-
tration and recrystallized twice in ethanol/acetonitrile.
J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.353 (t, 1H), 3.933 (s, 3H). HRMS (ESI+): m/z: calcd.
for C23H15NO6: 424.0792 [M + Na+]; found: 424.0711.
2a: m.p. 204–205 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3040, 1720, 1690,
3d: Yield: 70.3%. m.p. 204–205 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 1712,
1670, 1560, 984 cmꢁ1
.
1H NMR (CDCl3, d, ppm): 10.049 (s, 1H),
1592, 1502, 1348, 1178, 1064 cmꢁ1 1H NMR(DMSO, d, ppm):
.
8.631 (s, 1H), 8.078 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.927 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
7.871 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 7.826 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.686 (q,
J = 13.3 Hz, 2H), 7.394 (m, 2H).
8.595 (s, 1H), 8.273 (s, 1H), 8.056 (q, J = 1.5 Hz, J = 9.5 Hz, 3H),
7.877 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.689 (d, J = 4.5 Hz, 1H), 7.664 (d,
J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.802 (q, J = 2.0 Hz, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 6.597 (d,
J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.493 (q, 4H), 1.141 (t, 6H). HRMS (ESI+): m/z: calcd.
for C26H22N2O5: 465.1421 [M + Na+]; found: 465.1472.
2b: m.p. 209–210 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3040, 1730, 1700,
1630, 1540, 982 cmꢁ1 1H NMR (CDCl3, d, ppm): 10.060 (s, 1H),
.
8.544 (d, J = 15.5 Hz, 1H), 8.108 (q, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 8.037 (d,
J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.947 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.866 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
7.720 (m, 1H), 7.350 (m, 2H).
2.3. Quantum chemical calculations
2c: m.p. 203–204 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3050, 1720, 1690,
The full geometry optimization, resonance frequencies, lowest
energy electronic transitions, and absorption spectra of compounds
3a–3d were calculated with the density functional theory (DFT) and
the time-dependent DFT (TD-DFT) from Becke’s three-parameter
hybrid functional (B3LYP) [20] method using two different basis
sets 6-311+Gꢀꢀ and 6-31Gꢀ. The solvent polarity effects were in-
cluded in the conductor-like polarizable continuum model (C-
PCM) [21]. The solvent used in our calculations was N,N0-dimethyl-
formide (DMF). All calculations were performed using the Gaussian
03 program.
1660, 1610, 962 cmꢁ1 1H NMR (CDCl3, d, ppm): 10.048 (s, 1H),
.
8.600 (s, 1H), 8.078 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.923 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
7.865 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.822 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.253 (m, 3H),
4.008 (s, 3H).
2d: m.p. 205–206 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3090, 1750, 1700,
1621, 1600, 1060 cmꢁ1 1H NMR (CDCl3, d, ppm): 10.035 (s, 1H),
.
8.570 (s, 1H), 8.272 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.905 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H),
7.814(t, 3H), 7.442 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 6.648 (q, J = 2.5 Hz,
J = 2.5 Hz, 1H), 6.502 (d, J = 2.0 Hz, 1H), 3.479 (q, 4H), 1.261 (t, 6H).
The general process for the synthesis of compounds 3a–3d is as
follows: a mixture of compounds 2a–2d (1 mol), cyanoacetic acid
(1 mol), and piperidine (2 mL) in acetonitrile (200 mL) was placed
in a three-necked flask under a nitrogen atmosphere and heated to
reflux for approximately 1 h. After cooling, the precipitate was col-
lected and recrystallized from acetonitrile to obtain the pure com-
pounds 3a–3d.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. UV–vis absorption and fluorescence of compounds 3a–3d
The UV–vis absorption spectra of compounds 3a–3d in dilute
DMF solutions are shown in Fig. 1. These molecules consist of a
3a: Yield: 52.4%. m.p. 204–205 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3442,
2366, 1729, 1606, 1177 cmꢁ1
.
1H NMR(DMSO, d, ppm): 8.827 (s,
typical D–
and cyanoacrylic acid groups act as donor (D),
ter ( ), and acceptor (A) moieties, respectively. Structural modifi-
p–A structure, wherein 3-carbonylcoumarinyl, styryl,
1H), 8.696 (s, 1H), 8.148 (s, 1H), 8.023 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.942
(d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.904 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.766 (s, 2H), 7.743 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.493 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.430 (t, 1H). HRMS
(ESI+): m/z: calcd. for C22H13NO5: 394.0686 [M + Na+]; found:
394.0611.
p-conjugated cen-
p
cation only occurs in the coumarin moiety, where the 4-, 7-, and
8-positions are replaced with hydroxyl, diethylamino, and meth-
oxyl groups, respectively. Such modifications are expected to
change the electron-donating capability of the 3-carbonylcou-
marinyl group, as well as cause red-shifts in the absorption and
emission spectra.
The degree of red-shift in compound 3d is greater than that in
compound 3c because the electron-repelling group at position 7
leads to electron displacement in the 3-carbonylcoumarinyl group
(Fig. 2). This displacement enhances the electron-donating capabil-
ity of the 3-carbonylcoumarinyl group. Although electron displace-
ment occurs (Fig. 3) in the hydroxyl group at position 4 of
3b: Yield: 49.1%. m.p. 279–280 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3424,
2363, 1709, 1613, 1433, 1276 cmꢁ1 1H NMR(DMSO, d, ppm):
.
8.342 (t, 2H), 8.110 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.023 (t, 2H), 7.936 (d,
J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.826 (t, 1H), 7.430 (t, 2H). HRMS (ESI+): m/z: calcd.
for C22H13NO6: 410.0635 [M + Na+]; found: 410.0614.
3c: Yield: 62.8%. m.p. 269–270 °C. IR (KBr pellet cmꢁ1): 3427,
1727, 1606, 1470, 1274, 1179 cmꢁ1 1H NMR(DMSO, d, ppm):
.
8.664 (s, 1H), 8.332 (s, 1H), 8.087 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.936 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.775 (s, 2H), 7.473 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.429 (d,