Angewandte
Chemie
was found in less than 5% yield by 1H NMR spectroscopy and
were not further analyzed.The presence of traces of 3 in the
resulting aqueous solution indicates that the reaction pathway
leading to this product is possible under these conditions, but
is overwhelmingly dominated by the competing diketone
cleavage pathway.We emphasize herein that the diketone
homolytic cleavage is completely suppressed within cage 1
and that kinetically unfavorable pathways without homolytic
cleavage became major pathways thanks to the remarkable
cage effect of 1.
Received: March 21, 2007
Published online: June 25, 2007
Keywords: a-diketones · cage compounds · cyclization ·
photochemistry · self-assembly
.
Scheme 2. Proposed reaction mechanisms for the formation of 3, 4,
and 5.
[1] a) N.J. Turro, Modern Molecular Photochemistry, 1st ed., The
Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Co., Menlo Park, 1978.
can be formed from water through hydrogen radical abstrac-
tion.Several products (such as, for example, more oxidation
products of 3–5) were probably involved in the complex
reaction mixture, however, none have been isolated thus far.
To study how cage 1 affected the photoreaction of 2, a
control experiment without cage 1 under anaerobic condi-
tions was examined.The degassed cyclohexane solution of 2
was irradiated for 3 h to give benzaldehyde (5%) and
cyclohexyl phenyl ketone (10%) as major products.These
were formed through the benzoyl radical route as a result of
the homolytic cleavage of the a-diketone unit (Scheme 3).
[2] For the cleavage reactions of a-diketones, see: a) I.Tabushi, S.
Kojo, Z.Yoshida, Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 14, 2329 – 2332; b) P.
Kaszynski, J.Michl, J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 4593 – 4594; c) Y.
Sawaki, C.S. Foote, J. Org. Chem. 1983, 48, 4934 – 4940; d) Y.
Sawaki, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1983, 56, 3464 – 3470.
[3] For the photoreactions of a-diketones except for cleavage
reaction, see: a) K.Nakatani, K.Tanabe, I.Saito,
Tetrahedron
Lett. 1997, 38, 1207 – 1210; b) A.Takuwa, Y.Nishigaichi, K.
Yamashita, H.Iwamono, Chem. Lett. 1990, 639 – 642; c) A.
Thomas, G.Anikumar, V.Nair,
Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 2481 –
2488; d) W.H.Urry, D.J.Trecker, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84,
118 – 120; e) M.B.Rubin, P.Zwitkowits, J. Org. Chem. 1964, 29,
2362 – 2368; f) J.Mattay, J.Gersdorf, U.Freudenberg,
Tetrahe-
dron Lett. 1984, 25, 817 – 820.
[4] For cage effects in photoreactions, see: a) J.Franck, E.Rabino-
witsch, Trans. Faraday Soc. 1934, 30, 120 – 131; b) N.J. Turro,
Chem. Commun. 2002, 2279 – 2292; c) V.F.Tarasov, N.D.Ghat-
lia, A.L.Buchachenko, N.J.Turro, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
9517 – 9526; d) L.S.Kaanumalle, J.Nithyanandhan, M.Pattabira-
man, N.Jayaraman, V.Ramamurthy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
8999; e) V.Ramamurthy, D.F.Eaton, Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21,
300 – 306; f) L.S. Kaanumalle, C.L.D. Gibb, B.C. Gibb, V.
Ramamurthy, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14366 – 14367; g) D.J.
Cram, M.E.Tanner, R.Thomas, Angew. Chem. 1991, 103, 1048 –
1051; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1991, 30, 1024 – 1027.
[5] a) M.Fujita, D.Oguro, M.Miyazawa, H.Oka, K.Yamaguchi, K.
Ogura, Nature 1995, 378, 469 – 471; b) T.Kusukawa, M.Fujita,
Angew. Chem. 1998, 110, 3327 – 3329; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
1998, 37, 3142 – 3144; c) T.Kusukawa, M.Yoshizawa, M.Fujita,
Angew. Chem. 2001, 113, 1931 – 1936; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 1879 – 1884.
Scheme 3. Photoreaction of 2 in cyclohexane.
Benzoic acid was also formed (10%), although we could not
determine the reaction pathway.More importantly, we could
not detect any trace amounts of 3–5, which form in the
absence of homolytic cleavage.When this reaction was
examined under aqueous conditions (H2O/methanol = 6:4),
only a trace amount (< 1%) of the product 3 was detected in
the reaction mixture.Each of the additional products formed
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5717 –5719
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
5719