positions. These include the pyrazole-pyridazine-piperazine
scaffold 1 and the oxadiazole-pyridazine-phenyl scaffold
2 (Figure 1).
Scheme 1. General Routes for the Synthesis of R-Helix
Mimetics Based on Pyridazine 6
Figure 1. (a) Pyrazole-pyridazine-piperazine scaffold. (b) Super-
imposition of 1 (orange) on the i, i + 3, i + 7 positions of an
R-helix. (c) Oxadiazole-pyridazine-phenyl scaffold. (d) Super-
imposition of 2 (orange) on the i, i + 3, i + 7 positions of an
R-helix.
ropyridazine.12 Accordingly, esterification of commercially
available 6-oxo-1,6-dihydropyridazine-3-carboxylic acid 5
followed by treatment with POCl3 gave 6.13 This underwent
homolytic alkylation by free isobutyl radical, generated by
silver-catalyzed oxidative decarboxylation of isovaleric acid,
and led to a mixture (ca 2:1 regioisomeric ratio) of regio-
isomers 3 and 4 that were easily separated by flash
chromatography.
The structures of regioisomers 3 and 4 were assigned on
the basis of the chemical shifts of the aromatic protons (see
the Supporting Information). Moreover, it has been reported
that similar pyridazines having a carbonitrile group instead
of the ethyl ester function reacted with pivalic acid under
the same conditions to yield a 7:3 mixture of two regioiso-
mers, the major one having the same regiochemistry (con-
firmed by X-ray analysis) of 3.14
The major regioisomer 3 underwent Sonogashira cou-
pling15 with benzyl and isobutyl alkynyl alcohols 7a,b16 and
eventually led to pyridazines 8a,b, respectively, in good
yields (Scheme 2). Oxidation of 8a,b to the corresponding
ketones 9a,b was achieved in high yields with the Dess-
Martin periodinane reagent, while oxidation with MnO2 gave
good results only with compound 8a (R2 ) isobutyl).
Acetylenic ketones such as 9 are known to undergo het-
eroannulation reactions with bis-nucleophiles like ureas,
guanidines, hydrazines, and others.17 Accordingly, com-
pounds 9a,b were reacted with hydrazine in MeOH at 0 °C
affording after 1 h the pyrazole derivatives 10a,b in high
yields. After hydrolysis of the ethyl ester function with LiOH
Inspired by the Hamilton terphenyl, we sought improved
synthetic accessibity, and an amphiphilic structure with
hydrophobic surface for recognition and a “wet edge” for
enhanced solubility.
As depicted in Scheme 1, compounds 1 and 2 could be
obtained in a few steps involving a minimum number of
C-C bond-forming reactions, starting from two regioiso-
meric 4- and 5-alkyl-3-chloro-6-carboxypyridazine ethyl
esters 3 and 4, respectively. The latter could be obtained by
nucleophilic alkylation of 3-chloro-6-carboxypyridazine ethyl
ester 611 by alkyl free radicals that are known to react with
electron-poor protonated heteroaromatics such as 3,6-dichlo-
(7) (a) Hagihara, M.; Anthony, N. J.; Stout, T. J.; Clardy, J.; Schreiber,
S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 6568-6570. (b) Gennari, G.; Salom,
B.; Potenza, D.; Williams, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 2067-
2069. (c) Gude, M.; Piarulli, U.; Potenza, D.; Salom, B.; Gennari, C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 8589-8592. (d) Cho, C. Y.; Moran, E. J.;
Cherry, S. R.; Stephans, J. C.; Fodor, S. P. A.; Adams, C. L.; Sundaram,
A.; Jacobs, J. W.; Schultz, P. G. Science 1993, 261, 1303-1305. (e) Hamuro,
Y.; Geib, S. J.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 7529-7541.
(f) Nowick, J. S.; Mahrus, S.; Smith, E. M.; Ziller, J. W. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1996, 118, 1066-1072. (g) Lokey, R. S.; Iverson, B. L. Nature, 1995,
375, 303-305. (h) Murray, T. J.; Zimmerman, S. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 4010-4011. (i) Antuch, W.; Menon, S.; Chen, Q.-Z.; Lu, Y.;
Sakamuri, S.; Beck, B.; Schauer-Vukasinovic, V.; Agarwal, S.; Hess, S.;
Do¨mling, A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2006, 16, 1740-1743. For reviews
concerning R-helix mimetics, see: (j) Yin, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4130-4163. (k) Fletcher, S.; Hamilton, A. D. J.
R. Soc. Interface 2006, 3, 215-233. (l) Davis, J. M.; Tsou, L. K.; Hamilton,
A. D. Chem. Soc. ReV. 2007, 36, 326-334. See also: (m) Cummings, M.
D.; Schubert, C.; Parks, D. J.; Calvo, R. R.; Lafrance, L. V.; Lattanze, J.;
Milkiewicz, K. L.; Tianbao, L. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2006, 67, 201-205.
(n) Ahn, J.-M.; Han, S.-Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 3543-3547.
(8) (a) Orner, B. P.; Ernst, J. T.; Hamilton, A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 5382-5383. (b) Yin, H.; Lee, G.; Sedey, K. A.; Kutzki, O.;
Park, H. S.; Orner, B. P.; Ernst, J. T.; Wang, H.-G.; Sebti, S. M.; Hamilton,
A. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 10191-10196. (c) Yin, H.; Lee, G.;
Park, H. S.; Payne, G. A.; Rodriguez, J. M.; Sebti, S. M.; Hamilton, A. D.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 2704-2707.
(12) Samaritoni, J. G. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 1988, 20, 117-121.
(13) Morishita, M.; Kobayashi, J.; Yamada, H.; Yajima, T. Chem. Pharm.
Bull. 1994, 42, 371-372.
(14) Hackler, R. E.; Arnold, W. R.; Dow, W. R.; Johnson, G. W.; Kaster,
S. V. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1990, 38, 508-514.
(15) For a very recent review on Sonogashira coupling see: Chinchilla,
R.; Na´jera, C. Chem. ReV. 2007, 107, 874-922 and references cited therein.
(16) Benzyl and isobutyl alkynyl alcohols 7a,b were obtained in excellent
yields by reacting the corresponding aldehydes with ethynylmagnesium
bromide.
(9) Ernst, J. T.; Becerill, J.; Park, H. S.; Yin, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 535-539.
(10) Yin, H.; Hamilton, A. D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 1375-
1379.
(11) Due to the electronic properties of the substituents, the electrophi-
licity of C-4 and C-5 on 6 should not differ so much.
(17) Bagley, M. C.; Huges, D. D.; Taylor, P. H. Synlett 2003, 259-262.
3734
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 19, 2007