C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Scheme 1 a
amount of the undesired macrocycles resulting from trimerization
of 1 (A6 or (AB)3) was present in the final products.7
We believe the dynamic nature of this chemistry is critical to
the success of these reactions. Under kinetic control, 3-fold
intermolecular macrocyclizations proceed in only low yield (20-
25%).11 The error-correcting aspects of DCC are likely of particular
importance to the self-assembly of macrocycles A5B, A4B2, and
A3B3 as the system must presumably reclaim a variety of unwanted
oligomeric byproducts resulting from initial mismatching of 1-3.
To demonstrate that this system is dynamic, macrocycles A6 and
(AB)3 (unreduced imine forms) were prepared in separate flasks,
then mixed. After it was stirred at room temperature (8 h), the
reaction mixture was reduced as before.7 Analysis by MALDI mass
spectrometry (Figures S1 and S2, Supporting Information) indicates
that the final mixture incorporated all possible macrocycles contain-
ing 1AA and 1AB, and was qualitatively in agreement with the
a (a) Sc(OTf)3, 1,2,4-TCB, 75 °C, 3 h; (b) 25 °C, 1 mmHg, 5 h; (c)
NaBH(OAc)3.
expected 1:3:3:1 equilibrium ratio for 3×1AA (A6), 2×1AA+1AB
,
Table 1. Macrocycle Yields (Crude and Isolated)
1AA+2×1AB, and 3×1AB ((AB)3), respectively. This interchange
of monomers under the reaction conditions confirms the dynamic
nature of this system.
crude
yielda
isolated yield
(puritya)
macrocycle
A6
77%
72%
46%
64%
69%
59% (88%)
69% (90%)
44% (83%)
56% (88%)
58% (90%)
To summarize, we have demonstrated the self-assembly of
diphenylacetylene monomers into complex, unsymmetrical shape-
persistent macrocycles. A series of potentially useful side-chain
patterns, including monofunctionalized and Janus-type structures,
has been demonstrated. We believe this is the first nontrivial
example of the directionality of a dynamic covalent bond being
used to program the construction of an organic nanostructure. We
are currently exploring methods to exploit this process in more
complex, polyfunctional oligomer self-assembly.
(AB)3
A5B
A4B2
A3B3
a Based on the deconvolution of GPC traces.7
Scheme 2 a
Acknowledgment. This work was supported by the National
Science Foundation (Grant CHE-0642413 and DMI-0328162).
Supporting Information Available: Experimental procedures for
monomer synthesis and macrocycle self-assembly, details of the A6/
(AB)3 scrambling experiment, and full characterization data for all
macrocycles. This material is available free of charge via the Internet
References
(1) (a) Zhang, W.; Moore, J. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 4416. (b)
Ho¨ger, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2004, 10, 1320. (c) Yamaguchi, Y.; Yoshida,
Z.-i. Chem. Eur. J. 2003, 9, 5430.
(2) (a) Fischer, M.; Lieser, G.; Rapp, A.; Schnell, I.; Mamdouh, W.; De Feyter,
S.; De Schryver, F. C.; Ho¨ger, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 214. (b)
Ma, C. T. L.; MacLachlan, M. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4178.
(c) Naddo, T.; Che, Y.; Zhang, W.; Balakrishnan, K.; Yang, X.; Yen, M.;
Zhao, J.; Moore, J. S.; Zang, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6978. (d)
Tobe, Y.; Utsumi, N.; Kawabata, K.; Nagano, A.; Adachi, K.; Araki, S.;
Sonoda, M.; Hirose, K.; Naemura, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5350.
(e) Sugiura, H.; Takahira, Y.; Yamaguchi, M. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70,
5698.
a (a) Sc(OTf)3, 1,2,4-TCB, 75 °C, 3 h; (b) 25 °C, 1 mmHg, 5 h; (c)
NaBH(OAc)3.
cause the formation of other byproducts with dangling reactive
sites.9 Owing to the symmetry of monomers 2 and 3, it is not
possible to produce macrocycles with completely arbitrary control
over the side-chain substitution. However, we have demonstrated
a variety of useful patterns, including amphiphilic “Janus” structures
(A3B3), and mono- and difunctionalized macrocycles (A4B2 and
A5B). These latter patterns could be used to incorporate tether points
for attachment to other macromolecules or surfaces.10
(3) Rowan, S. J.; Cantrill, S. J.; Cousins, G. R. L.; Sanders, J. K. M.; Stoddart,
J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 898.
(4) Hartley, C. S.; Elliott, E. L.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
4512.
(5) Giuseppone, N.; Schmitt, J.-L.; Schwartz, E.; Lehn, J.-M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 5528.
(6) Heaney, H.; Simcox, M. T.; Slawin, A. M. Z.; Giles, R. G. Synlett 1998,
640.
(7) See Supporting Information.
(8) For example, see: (a) Shetty, A. S.; Fischer, P. R.; Stork, K. F.; Bohn, P.
W.; Moore, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9409. (b) Hill, J. P.; Jin,
W.; Kosaka, A.; Fukushima, T.; Ichihara, H.; Shimomura, T.; Ito, K.;
Hashizume, T.; Ishii, N.; Aida, T. Science 2004, 304, 1481. (c) Monti,
D.; Venanzi, M.; Stefanelli, M.; Sorrenti, A.; Mancini, G.; Natale, C.;
Paolesse, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6688.
It is noteworthy that despite many potential byproducts, the crude
yields, isolated yields, and purity of these more complex macro-
cycles were similar to those of A6 (Table 1). A comparison of the
crude yields and GPC traces7 of A6 and A3B3 suggests that there
was only a slight increase in the formation of higher molecular
weight byproducts in the three component case. In all examples,
NMR confirms the reduced symmetry of the macrocyclic core, and
the desired products dominate the MALDI mass spectra. The
MALDI spectra also suggest that only a small (but observable)
(9) For example, undesired formation of A6 or (AB)3 from 3×1 requires that
the leftover 3 equiv of 2 and 3 form an oligomer or strained macrocycle.
(10) Kubowicz, S.; Pietsch, U.; Watson, M. D.; Tchebotareva, N.; Mu¨llen,
K.; Thu¨nemann, A. F. Langmuir 2003, 19, 5036.
(11) Ho¨ger, S.; Meckenstock, A.-D.; Pellen, H. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4556.
JA0745963
9
J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 129, NO. 38, 2007 11683