Chemistry Letters Vol.33, No.10 (2004)
1337
10-2
10-3
spectrum of polymer 2a this is the consequence of the increased
conjugated ꢀ-electron system of the triphenylamine in compar-
ison with carbazolyl chromophore. On the other hand difference
in ꢀ-electron conjugation between corresponding monomers
and polymers is not significant which proves that conjugated
ꢀ-electron systems remain intact during polyaddition reaction.
t=25oC
1x10-4
1x10-5
10-6
1a
0,8
µ
1b
2a
2b
1a+PVB, 1:1
2a
10-7
0,6
0,4
0,2
1b+PVB, 1:1
2b
10-8
0
200
400
600
E1/2 (V/cm)1/2
800
1000
1200
1400
Figure 2. Field dependencies of the hole-drift mobilities.
films of 2a, 2b is by ca. three orders of magnitude higher than
in a classical polymeric photoconductor poly(N-vinylcarba-
zole).8 In addition, the hole mobility in polymer 2b containing
triphenylamine moiety is by ca. one order of magnitude higher
than in polymer 2a containing carbazolyl group.
0,0
250 275 300 325 350 375 400 425
Wavelength [nm]
More representatives of this family of hole-transporting
polymers will be described in our following publications.
Figure 1. UV absorption spectra of the monomers 1a, 1b and
polymers 2a, 2b in THF solutions.
We thank Dr. G. Lattermann (Bayreuth University,
Germany) for assistance with the GPC analysis.
The ionization potential (Ip) was measured by electron pho-
toemission in air, similar to the method described.5 The Ip value
of 5.37 eV is for monomer 1a and 5.40 eV for polymer 2a. Re-
placement of the 9-ethylcarbazolyl group by the triphenylamino
group leads to the decrease of Ip to 5.34 eV for monomer 1b and
5.30 eV for polymer 2b accordingly.
References and Notes
1
2
Y. Shirota, J. Mater. Chem., 10, 1 (2000).
J. V. Grazulevicius and P. Strohriegl, ‘‘Handbook of
AdvancedElectronic and Photonic Materials and Devices,’’
ed. by H. S. Nalwa, Academic Press (2000), Vol. 10,
p 233.
Polymers 2a, 2b are soluble in common organic solvents
such as chloroform, THF, dioxane etc. This really good solubil-
ity is mainly due to the flexible linking fragments between chro-
mophores. Clear, transparent and homogeneous films of poly-
mers 2a, 2b were obtained by the casting technique. The hole-
drift mobility for synthesized monomers 1a, 1b polymers 2a,
2b was measured by time of flight technique.6,7 Positive corona
charging created electric field inside the TM layer. Charge car-
riers were generated at the layer surface by illumination with
pulses of nitrogen laser (pulse duration was 2 ns, wavelength
337 nm). The layer surface potential decrease as a result of pulse
illumination was up to 1–5% of initial potential before illumina-
tion. The capacitance probe that was connected to the wide fre-
quency band electrometer measured the speed of the surface po-
tential decrease dU=dt. The transit time tt was determined by the
kink on the curve of the dU=dt transient in linear or double log-
arithmic scale. The drift mobility was calculated by the formula
(ꢁ ¼ d2=U0tt, where d is the layer thickness and U0 is the sur-
face potential at the moment of illumination. Figure 2 shows
the room temperature dependencies of hole-drift mobility on
electric field in monomers 1a, 1b with polymeric binding
material polyvinylbutiral (PVB) and polymers 2a, 2b. The
hole-drift mobilities in amorphous films of 2a, 2b exceeds
10ꢁ4 cm2 Vꢁ1sꢁ1 at an electric field of 106 V cmꢁ1. This is a
rather high mobility as for amorphous polymeric TM, it is by
ca. one order of magnitude higher than in the compositions of
1a, 1b with PVB. This improvement in results over monomers
is mainly due to the elimination of polymeric binding material
from the composition. The hole-drift mobilities in amorphous
3
1a: mp 119–120 ꢂC (from toluene) 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3), ꢂ: 8.38 (split s, 2H); 7.9–7.88 (m, 4H); 7.49–7.43
(m, 4H); 7.40–7.32 (m, 6H); 6.96 (t, 2H, J ¼ 7:2 Hz);
4.42–4.29 (m, 6H); 4.06–3.97 (dd, 2H, (HA), JAX ¼ 4:5 Hz,
JAB ¼ 16:4 Hz); 3.31 (m, 2H); 2.90–2.85 (dd, 2H, (HA),
JAX ¼ 3:9 Hz); 2.70–2.65 (dd, 2H, (HB), JBX ¼ 2:7 Hz;
JAB ¼ 5:1 Hz); 1.43 (t, J ¼ 7:2 Hz). Anal. Calcd for
C41H46N6O2: C 75.20; H 7.08; N 12.83%. Found, C 75.01;
H 6.91; N 12.68%.
4
1b: mp 163.5–165 ꢂC (from toluene) 1H NMR (300 MHz,
CDCl3), ꢂ: 7.63 (s, 2H); 7.62–7.56 (m, 4H); 7.43–7.02 (m,
17H); 6.94 (t, 2H, J ¼ 7:1 Hz); 4.40–4.30 (dd, 2H, (HA),
JAX ¼ 2:1 Hz, JAB ¼ 16:5 Hz); 4.02–3.92 (dd, 2H, (HB),
JBX ¼ 4:2 Hz); 3.26 (m, 2H); 2.84 (dd, 2H, (HA),
JAX ¼ 4:2 Hz, JAB ¼ 5:1 Hz); 2.65–2.60 (dd, (HB), JBX
¼
2:7 Hz). Anal. Calcd for C38H35N5O2: C 76.87; H 5.94; N
11.80%. Found, C 76.71; H 5.91; N 11.70%.
E. Miyamoto, Y. Yamaguchi, and M. Yokoyama, Electro-
photography, 28, 364 (1989).
E. Montrimas, V. Gaidelis, and A. Pazera, Liet. Fiz. Z., 6,
569 (1966).
A. Y. C. Chan and C. Juhasz, Int. J. Electron., 62, 625
(1987).
P. M. Borsenberger and D. S. Weiss, ‘‘Organic photorecep-
tors for Imaging Systems,’’ Marcel Dekker, Inc. (1993),
p 411.
5
6
7
8
Published on the web (Advance View) September 18, 2004; DOI 10.1246/cl.2004.1336