C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
Products were eluted from the macrobeads with HF-py (and then
TMSOEt), diluted to 10 mM stock solutions (DMF), and analyzed
by LC/MS and stock solution decoding.18 These data revealed
acceptable levels of purity and structures consistent with expecta-
tions. Our second step in postsynthesis quality control was
performed following both full arraying of all macrobeads and
automated stock solution preparation.
the National Cancer Institute, Merck KGaA, Merck & Co., and
the Keck Foundation for support of the Harvard Institute of
Chemistry and Cell Biology, and the National Cancer Institute for
support of the Molecular Target Laboratory. O.K. was and S.B.P.
is a Research Associate, and S.L.S. is an Investigator at the Howard
Hughes Medical Institute in the Department of Chemistry and
Chemical Biology, Harvard University.
The 88 200 individual macrobeads were first arrayed into 384-
well microtiter plates using a vacuum-based bead arrayer to entrain
352 beads in an equal number of wells (two columns of wells from
each plate were left empty to accommodate controls used in
subsequent assays).5a Microtiter plates containing one bead per well
were then subjected to a robotic cleavage process, in which each
well was treated with 20 µL of HF-py cocktail (5% HF-py, 5% py
in THF) delivered using a ceramic pump. After 300 min at room
temperature, each cleavage reaction was quenched with 20 µL of
TMSOEt19 for 30 min, evaporated, and eluted from beads with three
30 µL DMF washes. DMF eluates were pooled into fresh 384-
well “mother plates”, each of which was mapped into five “daughter
plates” by volumetric transfer using a Hydra384 syringe-array robot
(50% of stock solution for cell-based assays, 20% for small
molecule microarrays 2 × 10% for compound archiving, and 10%
for chemical analysis).5b
Currently, 150 microtiter plates (52 800 single compound-
containing stock solutions, approximately two theoretical copies)
have been arrayed, and 61 microtiter plates (21 472 compounds,
73% of a theoretical copy) have been formatted into “daughter
plates”. For post-automated formatting, quality control (QC)
analysis, we again used LC/MS and stock solution decoding.18b The
structures of 88 out of 100 samples were inferred successfully by
LC/MS and GC decoding. The structures of the remaining 12 were
inferred by GC decoding, but could not be confirmed by LC/MS.
Preliminary analysis of the purity of resulting stock solutions
and their performance in both protein-binding and phenotypic assays
has revealed that the overall process is sufficient for identifying
novel small molecules having specific and potent protein-binding
and cellular activities. We expect that the pathway should be subject
to further development and optimization, including modified
pathways guided by analyses of the molecular descriptors of the
small molecules in advance of their synthesis. We are optimistic
that this pathway will provide many effective probes for chemical
genetic studies aimed at dissecting biology.
Supporting Information Available: Representative experimental
procedures and characterization data (PDF). An X-ray crystallographic
file (CIF). This material is available free of charge via the Internet at
References
(1) Schreiber, S. L. Science 2000, 287, 1964-1969.
(2) Dolle, R. E. J. Comb. Chem. 2001, 3, 477-517.
(3) (a) Schreiber, S. L. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 6, 1127-1152. (b)
Mitchison, T. J. Chem. Biol. 1994, 1, 3-6.
(4) In this paper, we define compounds with different: (1) numbers or sizes
of rings, (2) ring fusion stereochemistry, or (3) degree of ring fusion
saturation as having “different skeletons”.
(5) (a) Blackwell, H. E.; Perez, L.; Stavenger, R. A.; Tallarico, J. A.; Eatough,
E. C.; Foley, M. A.; Schreiber, S. L. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 1167-1182.
(b) Clemons, P. A.; Koehler, A. N.; Wagner, B. K.; Sprigings, T. G.;
Spring, D. R.; King, R. W.; Schreiber, S. L.; Foley, M. A. Chem. Biol.
2001, 8, 1183-1195.
(6) Woo, S.; Squires, N.; Fallis, A. G. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 573-575.
(7) Tallarico, J. A.; Depew, K. D.; Pelish, H. E.; Westwood, N. J.; Lindsley,
C. W.; Shair, M. D.; Schreiber, S. L.; Foley, M. A. J. Comb. Chem. 2001,
3, 312-318.
(8) For indium-mediated allylation of resin-bound aldehydes with sonica-
tion: Cavallaro, C. L.; Herpin, T.; MuGuinness, B. F.; Shimshock, Y.
C.; Dolle, R. E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 2711-2714.
(9) Prevost, C.; Miginiac, P.; Miginiac-Groizeleau, L. Bull. Soc. Chim. Fr.
1964, 2485-2492.
(10) See Supporting Information for details.
(11) Acyclic dienophiles tested: trans-â-nitrostyrene, dimethyl maleate, and
dimethyl fumarate.
(12) HF-py-mediated cleavage of macrobead-loaded 4 resulting from 100 mg
of 3-[diisopropyl(p-methoxyphenyl)silyl]propyl functionalized macrobeads
yielded 32 mg (0.71 mmol/g of beads, 109 nmol/bead) of the tetracyclic
product 7 (Figure 3) (single diastereomer and 95% pure by 1H NMR).
(13) 800 dienes (40 aldehydes × 20 dienophiles), 2640 tetracycles from
interrupted D-A with 1,2,4-triazoline-3,5-diones (40 aldehydes × 22
dienophiles × 3 disubstituted dienophiles), 24 320 tetracycles from
interrupted D-A with maleimides (40 aldehydes × 16 dienophiles × 38
disubstituted dienophiles), and 1640 tetracycles from consecutive D-A
(40 aldehydes × 41 disubstituted dienophiles).
(14) Compounds 7′, 12, and 13 were produced through solution-phase synthesis
during the pathway development phase of this research.10
(15) Burgess, K.; Liaw, A. I.; Wang, N. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 2985-2987.
(16) (a) Ohlmeyer, M. J. H.; Swanson, R. N.; Dillard, L. W.; Reader, J. C.;
Asouline, G.; Kobayashi, R.; Wigler, M.; Still, W. C. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 10922-10926. (b) Nestler, H. P.; Bartlett, P. A.;
Still, W. C. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59, 4723-4724.
(17) Pearlman, B. A.; McNamara, J. M.; Hasan, I.; Hatakeyama, S.; Sekizaki,
H.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 4248-4251.
(18) (a) Stavenger, R. A.; Schreiber, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40,
3417-3421. (b) Blackwell, H. E.; Perez, L.; Schreiber, S. L. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 3421-3425.
(19) TMSOEt was used as the quenching reagent instead of previously reported
TMSOMe to minimize cross-contamination in the 386-well microtiter
plate.
Acknowledgment. We thank Richard Staples for performing
X-ray crystallographic analysis and Cullen M. Taniguchi for
assistance in the early phase of these studies. We are especially
grateful to John Tallarico, Paul Clemons, and Max Narovlyansky
of the Harvard ICCB for their assistance. We thank the National
Institute for General Medical Sciences for support of this research,
JA028086E
9
13404 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 124, NO. 45, 2002