724
Z. A. Kaplancikli et al.
Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2008, 341, 721–724
day in the control was compare with that in the drug vial. The
following formula was used to interpret results:
N-(4-nitrobenzylidene)-2-[(2-carboxy-8-
methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetic acid
hydrazide IIIg
DGI control A DGI drug = Susceptible
DGI control a DGI drug = Resistant
1H-NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6, d ppm): 2.55 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.75 (s, 2H,
S-CH2), 7.00–8.20 (m, 6H, aromatic protons), 8.50–8.65 (m, 2H,
N=CH and imidazopyridine proton), 12.10 (s, 1H, NH). MS (FAB)
[M+1]: m/z 414. Anal. Calc. for C18H15N5O5S:C, 52.30; H, 3.66; N,
16.94. Found: C, 52.34; H, 3.69; N, 16.91.
If a clear susceptibility pattern (the difference of DGI of con-
trol and the drug bottle) was not seen at the time, the control
DGI is 30, the vials were read for one or two additional days to
establish a definite pattern of DGI differences.
N-(4-chlorobenzylidene)-2-[(2-carboxy-5-
methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetic acid
hydrazide IIIh
References
1H-NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6, d ppm): 2.75 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.90 (s, 2H,
S-CH2), 7.00–7.70 (m, 6H, aromatic protons), 8.45 (s, 1H, N=CH),
8.50–8.70 (m, 1H, aromatic proton), 12.10 (s, 1H, NH). MS (FAB)
[M+1]: m/z 403. Anal. Calc. for C18H15ClN4O3S:C, 53.73; H, 3.73; N,
13.93. Found: C, 53.65; H, 3.69; N, 13.94.
[1] World Health Organization, Tuberculosis control and
research strategies for the 1990s: Memorandum from a
WHO meeting, Bull. WHO 1992, 70(1), 17–21.
[2] Y. Zhang, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2005, 45, 529–564.
[3] P. F. Barnes, A. B. Bloch, P. T. Davidson, D. E. Snider, N.
Engl. J. Med. 1991, 324, 1644–1650. [PubMed, PMID:
2030721].
N-(4-methylbenzylidene)-2-[(2-carboxy-5-
methylimidazo[1,2-a]pyridine-3-yl)sulfanyl]acetic acid
[4] T. E. Freiden, T. Sterling, A. Pablos–Mendez, J. O. Kilburn,
et al., N. Engl. J. Med. 1993, 328, 521–526. [PubMed, PMID:
8381207].
hydrazide IIIi
1H-NMR (250 MHz, DMSO-d6, d ppm): 2.30 (s, 3H, phenyl-CH3),
2.75 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.85 (s, 2H, S-CH2), 7.15–7.65 (m, 6H, aromatic
protons), 8.40 (s, 1H, N=CH), 8.45–8.65 (m, 1H, aromatic proton),
12.15 (s, 1H, NH). MS (FAB) [M+1]: m/z 383. Anal. Calc. for
C19H18N4O3S:C, 59.67; H, 4.74; N, 14.65. Found: C, 59.65; H, 4.70;
N, 14.60.
[5] M. T. Cocco, C. Congiu, V. Onnis, M. C. Pusceddu, et al., Eur.
J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 1071–1076.
[6] M. E. Kimerling, H. Kluge, N. Vezhnina, T. Iacovazzi, et al.,
Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 1999, 3, 451–453.
[7] C. H. Crabb, Bull. World Health Organ. 2002, 80, 517.
Microbiology
[8] D. Sriram, P. Yogeeswari, R. V. Devakaram, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2006, 14, 3113–3118.
In-vitro evaluation of antimycobacterial activity against
Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv
[9] J. Patole, U. Sandbhor, S. Padhye, D. N. Deobagkar, et al.,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 51–55.
Antituberculotic activities of the compounds were tested at the
center of Tuberculosis Antimicrobial Acquisiton & Coordinating
Facility (TAACF). Compounds were tested for in-vitro antitubercu-
losis activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv (ATCC
27294) at 6.25 lg/mL, in BACTEC 12B medium using a broth
microdilution assay, the Microplate Alamar Blue Assay (MABA).
Compounds exhibiting fluorescence are tested in the BACTEC
460 Radiometric System [20].
[10] J. Guillon, R. C. Reynolds, J. M. Leger, M. A. Guie, et al., J.
Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2004, 19, 489–495.
[11] M. T. Cocco, C. Congiu, V. Onnis, M. C. Pusceddu, et al., Eur.
J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 1071–1076.
[12] M. J. Hearn, M. H. Cynamon, J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004,
53, 185191.
[13] V. Klimesovꢀ, J. Kocꢁ, M. Pour, J. Stachel, K. Waisser, Eur. J.
Med. Chem. 2002, 37, 409–418.
[14] V. Klimesovꢀ, J. Kocꢁ, K. Waisser, J. Kaustovꢀ, Farmaco 2002,
57, 259265.
BACTEC radiometric method of susceptibility testing
Inocula for susceptibility testing were either from a positive
BACTEC isolation vial with a growth index (GI) of 500 and more,
or suspension of organism isolated earlier on conventional
medium. The culture was well mixed with a syringe and 0.1 mL
of a positive BACTEC culture was added to each of the vials con-
taining the test drugs. The drug vials contained rifampicin
(0.25 lg/mL). A control vial was inoculated with a 1 : 100 micro-
dilution of the culture. A suspension equivalent to a Mc-Farland
No.1 standard was prepared in the same manner as a BACTEC
positive vial, when growth from a solid medium was used. Each
vial was tested immediately on a BACTEC instrument to provide
CO2 in the headspace. The vials were incubated at 378C and
tested daily with a BACTEC instrument. When the GI in the con-
trol read at least 30, the increase in GI (DGI) from the previous
[15] V. Klimesovꢀ, M. Svoboda, K. Waisser, J. Kaustovꢀ, et al.,
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 34, 433–440.
[16] A. Scozzafava, A. Mastrolorenzo, C. T. Supuran, Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2001, 11, 1675–1678.
[17] N. Benchat, M. Mimouni, S. Abouricha, T. Ben–Hadda, et
al., Lett. Drug Des. Discov. 2004, 1, 224–229.
[18] J. C. Teulade, G. Grassy, R. Escale, J. P. Chapat, J. Org. Chem.
1981, 46, 1026–1030.
[19] H. L. Yale, K. Losen, J. Martins, M. Holsing, et al., J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1953, 75, 1933–1942.
[20] L. Collins, S. G. Franzblau, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
1997, 41, 1004–1009.
i 2008 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim