Communications
deployed successfully in asymmetric imine reduction[8] and in
To explore the scope and limitations of this Ir/f-binaphane
catalytic system, a range of 1-substituted 3,4-dihydroisoqui-
noline imines (1a–1p) were synthesized and hydrogenated
under the optimized reaction conditions. The results are
summarized in Table 2. This iridium complex reduced both 1-
alkyl- (Table 2; entries 2, 3, and 14) and 1-aryl-3,4-dihydro-
isoquinolines effectively with excellent enantioselectivities.
As for 1-aryl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline imines, whether the
substituents are at the para (1d–1g) or meta (1h–1i) position
of the phenyl ring, all substrates afforded the corresponding
tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloids with high enantioselectivi-
ties (ee values range from 94% to 99%), regardless of the
electronic properties of the substituents; interestingly, when
the imines bear a 1-ortho-substituted phenyl ring (1j and 1k),
the hydrogenation results vary dramatically, and a higher
catalyst loading was required (Table 2, entries 10 and 11). The
high ee value for 1-(2’-OMeC6H4) imine is probably attributed
to the coordination effect of the oxygen to the transition
metal center, while the poor result for 1-(2’-MeC6H4) imine
stems from steric reasons. This catalytic system also worked
quite well for 1-heteroaromatic imine 1l, giving 96% ee with a
full conversion (Table 2, entry 12). It is worth mentioning that
both enantiomerically pure (S)-(À)-norcryptostyline II (2o)
and (S)-(À)-norcryptostyline III (2p) were obtained in over
99% ee (Table 2, entries 15 and 16).
reductive amination.[10]
Initially two iridium precursors were explored along with
(S,S)-f-binaphane for the asymmetric hydrogenation of the
standard substrate 1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline (1a).
The neutral [{Ir(cod)Cl}2] (cod = 1,5-cyclooctadiene) gave
better conversion yet with limited enantioselectivity (Table 1,
entries 1 and 2). From the solvent screening (Table 1,
entries 3–7), CH2Cl2 afforded the best enantioselectivity and
a good conversion. With the addition of 10 mol% of I2[11a] the
enantiomeric excess was enhanced to 88% and a full
conversion was achieved (Table 1, entry 8). When the
amount of I2 was reduced to 1 mol%, the ee value dropped
to 81% (Table 1, entry 9). Other common additives,[11] such as
potassium carbonate, triethylamine, phthylamide, and tri-
fluoroacetic acid were also investigated and proved to have no
positive effect on this hydrogenation. In a control study, a
brief screening of other diphosphines was carried out. As
expected, none of these ligands yielded comparable results to
f-binaphane (Table 1, entries 10–12). The iodine-bridged
dimeric iridium complexes, initially reported by Genet et
al,[12] have shown excellent reactivity in our previous research
on asymmetric hydrogenation of cyclic imines.[8d] Therefore,
complex [{Ir(H)[(S,S)-(f)-binaphane]}2(m-I)3]+IÀ (A) was also
applied in our study. To our delight, the enantiomeric excess
was further improved to 95% with a complete conversion
(Table 1, entry 13). Using 0.05 mol% of this Ir catalyst, the
reaction still preceded smoothly without compromising the
enantioselectivity; when the catalyst loading was further
decreased to 0.005 mol%, a slightly lower conversion and
ee value were obtained (Table 1, entries 14 and 15).
In summary, the highly effective iodine-bridged dimeric
[{Ir(H)[(S,S)-(f)-binaphane]}2(m-I)3]+IÀ complex has been
applied in the asymmetric hydrogenation of a wide range of
3,4-dihydroisoquinolines with excellent enantioselectivities
and high turnover numbers (up to 10000). The use of I2 as an
additive enhanced the performance of this catalyst. This
catalytic system offers an efficient
Table 1: Asymmetric hydrogenation of 1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline.[a]
access to various enantiomerically
pure tetrahydroisoquinoline alka-
loids, including the substructure of
the pharmaceutical drug of solife-
nacin. Further applications of this
complex for the asymmetric hydro-
genation of 3,4-dihydroquinolines
and other cyclic imines are in prog-
Entry Ir precursor
Ligand
Solvent
Additive
Conv. [%][b] ee [%][b]
ress.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
[Ir(cod)2BF4]
f-binaphane
EtOAc/CH2Cl2 (1:1)
EtOAc/CH2Cl2 (1:1)
EtOAc
CH2Cl2
THF
toluene
MeOH/CH2Cl2 (6:1)
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
30
52
98
86
99
84
11
22
23
32
46
22
20
35
88
81
34
–
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] TangPhos
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] DuanPhos
Experimental Section
Substrate preparation: All substrates
were prepared from the corresponding
2-arylethyl amine and alkyl- or arylcar-
bonyl chloride in two steps according to
literature reports.[13]
I2 (10 mol%) >99
9
I2 (1 mol%)
I2 (10 mol%)
I2 (10 mol%)
I2 (10 mol%)
I2/HI
>99
70
10
11
12
Catalyst preparation: Complex A
was prepared according to literature
reports.[8d,12] [{Ir(cod)Cl}2] (26.9 mg,
CH2Cl2
<5
<5
>99
>99
93
[{Ir(cod)Cl}2] C3*-TunePhos CH2Cl2
–
13[c,d] [{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
14[c,e] [{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
15[c,f] [{Ir(cod)Cl}2] f-binaphane
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
95
95
93
40 mmol)
and
(S,S)-f-binaphane
I2/HI
I2/HI
(71.0 mg, 88 mmol) in toluene (6 mL)
were stirred at room temperature for
2 h. Then an excess of aqueous HI
(55%, 34 mL) was added via a syringe.
[a] Reaction conditions: [Ir]/ligand/substrate=1:1:100, ligand/metal 1:1, 50 atm of H2, RT, 24 h.
[b] Reaction conversions and enantiomeric excess were determined by HPLC on a chiral stationary
phase after the amine products were converted into the corresponding acetamides. [c] HI was used for The resulting mixture was stirred over-
preparation of the iodine-bridged dimeric iridium complex [{Ir(H)[(S,S)-(f)-binaphane]}2(m-I)3]+IÀ (A)
according to references [8d],[12] [d] Complex A loading is 0.5 mol%. [e] Complex A loading is
0.05 mol%. [f] Complex A loading is 0.005 mol%.
night, and all volatiles were removed
under reduced pressure. The residue was
dissolved in dichloromethane, and hex-
ꢀ 2011 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 10679 –10681