Organic Letters
Letter
Table 1. Fluorination Reaction Optimizations
a
entry
[Cu] (mol %)
BPhen (mol %)
MeB(OH)2 (equiv)
Li2CO3 (equiv)
conv (%)
C−N (%)
C−F (CF2) (%)
b c
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
CuCl (10)
CuCl (10)
CuCl (10)
CuCl (10)
CuCl (10)
CuCl (2)
see Scheme 1A for conditions
nd
24
100
100
100
86
76
19
42
44
25
4
nd
4
c
c
c
5
5
5
5
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
21 (4)
40 (6)
74 (4)
81 (11)
CuOAc (2)
2.4
2
100
a
b
c
0.3 mmol scale. 1H NMR yields int std = CH2Br2. Reported results with ethylbenzene (ref 6). 1,2-Dichloroethane (DCE) used as the solvent.
The present study was initiated by investigating the original
The impact of MeB(OH)2 on the catalytic reaction is clearly
evident in Figure 1B. Virtually no reaction is observed in the
absence of MeB(OH)2. In contrast, full substrate conversion
occurs in the presence of 2 equiv of MeB(OH)2, leading to an
84% yield of the benzyl fluoride. This behavior is rationalized
by the ability of MeB(OH)2 to serve as a “redox buffer” for the
Cu catalyst, slowly reducing CuII during the reaction. A
mechanistic framework for these observations is illustrated in
Figure 1C. CuI is oxidized rapidly to CuII by NFSI at the
beginning of the reaction, but slow reduction of CuII by
MeB(OH)2 (dashed arrow, Figure 1C) generates small
amounts of CuI that can react with additional NFSI.
Cu/NFSI-catalyzed sulfonimidation reaction (Scheme 1C).6
This reaction takes place at much higher temperatures than
more recent Cu/NFSI reactions, which often proceed near
room temperature.7 Attempting the sulfonimidation of p-
bromoethylbenzene at lower temperature led to low
conversion, with a preference for C−N over C−F bond
formation (Table 1, entry 2). The formation of a C−F bond
could arise from reaction of an intermediate benzylic radical
with a CuII−F species10 or via a Cu-promoted radical-chain
process involving NFSI.8g,11 Addition of MeB(OH)2 as an in
situ reductant for the Cu catalyst7e (see further discussion
below) led to complete substrate conversion, but only
moderate yield of the C−N product was observed, with no
C−F product (Table 1, entry 3). Further variation of the
conditions, however, including addition of Li2CO3 as a base,
using PhCl as the solvent, and lowering the catalyst loading,
led to C−H fluorination in good yield (81%, Table 1, entry 7),
with no C−N product formation (see additional screening data
position is the primary side reaction.
•
Generation of NSI at this stage can lead to hydrogen atom
transfer (HAT) from the benzylic C−H with only limited
•
competitive quenching of NSI by CuI, due to the low CuI
concentration.
The synthetic scope of this reactivity is the focus of a
separate study;9 however, testing of representative substrates
showed that isolation of benzyl monofluorides can be rather
challenging, with poor mass balance and the appearance of new
Similar challenges are evident from previous C−H fluorination
methods,8 and other studies show that benzyl monofluorides
undergo facile displacement in the presence of Brønsted and
Lewis acids or hydrogen-bond donors.14 The latter insights
prompted us to assess the role of Li2CO3 in the reaction, which
was also used in a previous benzylic C−H fluorination
method.8g A time course for the optimized reaction conditions
in Figure 1B (right) may be compared to the time course
obtained without added Li2CO3 (Scheme 2A). The rate of
substrate conversion is virtually identical in the presence and
absence of Li2CO3; however, very little C−F product is
observed after the first few hours of the reaction without
Li2CO3, and the major products arise from C−O and C−N
bond formation. NHSI is a strong acid and will build up as the
fluorination reaction proceeds, and it could promote acidolysis
of the benzyl fluoride.15 In a control experiment, 1 equiv of
NHSI was added to a solution of benzyl fluoride obtained from
the catalytic reaction, following filtration through a silica plug
to remove the Li2CO3. This reaction results in rapid formation
of 1-phenylethanol (Scheme 2B). The hydroxy group
presumably originates from adventitious water from the solvent
or reagents present in the original reaction mixture. The net
C−H fluorination/hydrolysis sequence resembles the recently
reported C−H mesylation/hydrolysis strategy to achieve C−H
hydroxylation, reported by Ritter and co-workers.16
Several fundamental studies were undertaken to gain insight
into the observed reactivity and the role of MeB(OH)2 and
other reaction components. Copper(I) is proposed to react
with NFSI, forming a CuII−F species and an imidyl radical,
•NSI (Scheme 1B). The imidyl radical can promote hydrogen
atom transfer from the benzylic C−H bond, but it can react
even more rapidly with another CuI center,7e,12 generating a
second equivalent of CuII and halting catalysis. To probe Cu/
NFSI reactivity, NFSI was titrated into a solution of
BPhenCuI(OAc) in PhCl (Bphen = bathophenanthroline).
Nearly isosbestic behavior was observed by UV−vis spectros-
copy, corresponding to oxidation of CuI to CuII species by
NFSI (Figure 1A, step 1). Complete consumption of CuI was
observed upon addition of 0.5 equiv of oxidant. This oxidation
is rapid at room temperature, occurring on the time scale of
mixing. Addition of NFSI beyond 0.5 equiv has no effect on
the UV−vis spectrum, suggesting that CuII does not react
further with NFSI.
The CuII species generated by NFSI is reduced by
MeB(OH)2. Addition of 5 equiv of MeB(OH)2 to a solution
of CuII generated from a combination of BPhenCuI(OAc) and
0.5 equiv of NFSI in PhCl slowly regenerates CuI over
approximately 1 h (Figure 1A, step 2). This process generates
Me−N(SO2Ph)2 as a byproduct of the reaction, resembling the
previously reported Chan−Lam amidation of alkylboronic
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX