of supercritical fluids are an advantage because hydrogena-
tion is usually a highly exothermic reaction. However,
relatively few articles have been published on hydrogenation
in supercritical fluids,13-23 and most of those have involved
hydrogenation as a batch process, carried out in sealed
autoclaves. Reports on supercritical hydrogenation as a
continuous process are even rarer.
Industry, in particular, favours continuous processes
because they are more cost efficient and the reactors can be
kept smaller in size.2
3,24
This reduction in size reduces both
costs and safety problems of the high-pressure equipment
needed for supercritical reactions. There have been two
investigations into the hydrogenation of fats and oils in
continuous flow reactors using near-critical or supercritical
Figure 1. Flow apparatus for catalytic hydrogenation in
supercritical fluids, based on high-pressure modules (NWA
GmbH, L o1 rrach, Germany); see text for details of operation.
The components are labeled as follows: DU, pneumatically
CO
2
(scCO
2
, T
c
) 31.1 °C, P
c
) 73.8 bar) and propane
1,22
(scPropane, T
c
) 96.8 °C, P
c
) 42.6 bar).2
In a very
25
operated dosage unit for adding H
valves to control the flow rate and to separate the product(s)
from the fluid and excess H ; M, mixer; onIR, on-line FTIR
2
; E1 and E2, expansion
recent communication, we described a much more general
method for the selective hydrogenation of organic substrates
in supercritical fluids using a laboratory-scale continuous
flow reactor.
2
monitoring (Nicolet Impact 410); P, pump for the organic
substrate (Gilson 305); PH, preheater; PP, pneumatic pump
for CO
sor for H
2
or propane (module PM 101); PU, pneumatic compres-
(module CU 105); R, reactor (plus heater block not
In this paper, we describe our approach to supercritical
hydrogenation in greater detail. We begin by summarizing
the essential features of our reactor. Then, we describe a
series of reactions which illustrate the breadth of chemistry
accessible via the reactor. Next, we report a more detailed
study on the hydrogenation of alkenes, aimed at investigating
the effects of carrying out such reactions on a larger scale,
and in the final section, we describe the supercritical
hydrogenation of isophorone, a reaction with significant
industrial and environmental benefits.
2
shown) which is fitted with three thermocouples as illustrated
in Figure 8; S, pressure regulator for controlling the system
pressure; V, vent with flow meter (not shown).
their particular apparatus meets the necessary safety re-
quirements. The indiVidual components, which we describe
below, work well, but they are not necessarily the only
equipment of this type aVailable nor the most suitable for
the purpose.
Figure 1 shows a schematic view of the apparatus. The
pump, PP (PM 101, NWA GmbH), compresses the super-
critical fluid to maintain a system pressure of 40-200 bar,
which is controlled by the regulator, S. The organic substrate
is pumped with a standard HPLC pump, P (0.3-20.0 mL/
Experimental Section
Safety Hazard. CAUTION! The experiments described
in this paper inVolVe the use of relatiVely high pressures
and require equipment with the appropriate pressure rating.
It is the responsibility of indiVidual researchers to Verify that
min, Gilson 305). H
CU 105, NWA GmbH), and is added pulsewise via a dosage
unit, DU (based on pneumatic Rheodyne 6-port injection
valve) at a pulse rate chosen to give the desired H :substrate
ratio. The fluid, substrate, and H mixture is stirred
2
is compressed to 200-280 bar, PC
(
(
13) Howdle, S. M.; Healy, M. A.; Poliakoff, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112,
804.
14) Rathke, J. W.; Klingler, R. J.; Krause, T. R. Organometallics 1991, 10,
350.
2
4
(
2
1
mechanically and preheated, M+PH. The reaction mixture
then enters the reactor, R, which can be heated independently
by an aluminium block. We found that alkynes, alkenes,
and Schiff bases reacted readily at an initial reactor temper-
ature of 40 °C but, in most cases, additional heating of the
reactor was necessary.
(
15) Jessop, Ph. G.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. Nature 1994, 368, 231.
(16) Jessop, Ph. G.; Hsiano, Y.; Ikariya, T.; Noyori, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
1
18, 344.
17) Burk, M. J.; Feng, S.; Gross, M. F.; Tumas, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995,
17, 8277.
18) Minder, B.; Mallat, T.; Pickel, K.-H.; Steiner, K.; Baiker, A. Catal. Lett.
995, 34, 1.
(
(
1
1
(
(
19) Kr o¨ cher, O.; K o¨ ppel, R. A.; Baiker, A. Chem. Commun. 1996, 1497.
20) Pickel, K.-H.; Steiner, K. Proc. Int. Symp. Supercrit. Fluids, 3rd 1994, 3,
In the experiments described here, we used two inter-
changeable reactors made of 316 stainless steel tubing
2
5.
(
(
21) Tacke, T.; Wieland, S.; Panster, P. Process Technol. Proc. 1996, 12, 17.
22) H a¨ rr o¨ d, M.; Møller, P. Process Technol. Proc. 1996, 12, 43. H a¨ rr o¨ d, M.;
Macher, M. B.; H o¨ gberg, J.; Møller, P. Proc. Ital. Conf. Supercrit. Fluids
Their Appl., 4th Italy, 1997, 319.
(9-mm i.d.): length 78 mm (5-mL volume) and length 152
mm (10-mL volume). A frit at the bottom of the reactor
keeps the catalyst in place. The system has three thermo-
couples situated (i) inside the catalyst bed (Tcat), (ii) against
the reactor wall (Twall), and (iii) in the product stream leaving
the reactor (Tout). All three are used for monitoring the
reaction, but in practice, we have found that Twall gives the
most reproducible control of the heater.
(23) Roche Mag. 1992, 41, 2.
(24) Tundo, P. Continuous Flow Methods in Organic Synthesis; Ellis Horwood:
Chichester, UK, 1991.
(
25) Hitzler, M. G.; Poliakoff, M. Chem. Commun. 1997, 1667. Preliminary oral
presentations of this work have been given at the 4th International
Symposium on Supercritical Fluids, Sendai, Japan, May 1997, the Final
Meeting of EU COST Action D6, Santorini, Greece, June 1997, and the
6
th European Symposium on Organic Reactivity, Louvain, La Neuve,
Belgium, July 1997.
138
•
Vol. 2, No. 3, 1998 / Organic Process Research & Development