and RANEY Nis4200 are attributed to the partial oxidation
of the Ni surface on the commercial catalysts or formation of
aluminum oxide overlayers.12 It should be emphasized at this
point that molecular acids such as H3PO4 or CH3COOH led to
no hydrogenation activity at all in the presence of fresh
RANEYs Ni catalysts. This is caused by the dissolution
and oxidation of RANEYs Ni catalysts in the acidic aqueous
solution under reactions conditions. The Nafion polymer was
hardly ionized as the pH of aqueous solution remained nearly
neutral (pH = 6) during the course of the reaction.
acid for hydrolysis and dehydration (Fig. S3a, ESIw). Acid
promoted carbon-backbone transformation led also to
isomerized cycloalkanes, but did not lead to ring opening
(Fig. S3b, ESIw). The relatively high temperature (573 K)
induces cycloalkane dehydrogenation to form some cyclo-
alkenes and aromatic molecules with full metal Ni catalysts
(Fig. S3c, ESIw).13 The new catalyst combination opens the
possibility to tailored hydrodeoxygenation and hydrogenation
of lignin derived bio-products.
This research was performed in the framework of network
of excellence IDECAT.
This combination of catalysts, however, hardly showed
activity (1% conversion) with substituted phenols such as
2-methoxy-4-n-propylphenol at 473 K (Table 2) implying that
the methoxy group stabilizes the aromatic ring and increases
the difficulty for hydrogenation. Increasing the reaction
temperature to 523 and 573 K led to 38 and 80% conversions
with very high selectivities to cycloalkanes and methanol (490%).
With the optimized catalyst combination, a series of repre-
sentative bio-derived phenolic monomers (phenols, guaiacols
and syringols) were efficiently converted to hydrocarbons and
methanol under optimized conditions (573 K, 4 MPa H2, 2 h)
(see Table 3 and Scheme S1, ESIw). Phenolic monomers
containing six to nine carbon atoms directly linked in the
backbone were investigated. The one-pot aqueous phase pro-
cess led to over 90% yields of hydrocarbons and methanol
(Fig. S1, ESIw), being highly atom economic and energy
efficient. The product mixtures mainly include cyclohexane/
alkylcylcohexane, with low concentrations in cyclohexene/
alkylcyclohexene and benzene/alkylbenzene. The selectivities
for dehydrogenated products (cycloalkenes and benzene
derivatives) ranged from 7 to 15%. Acid catalyzed ring
contraction of isomerization products derived from cycloalkane,
such as 1-ethyl-2-methyl-cyclopentane and ethylcyclopentane,
were obtained for the C9 backbone phenolic-monomer
conversion, with selectivities from 0.5 to 2.7%. Minor hydro-
genolysis led to cycloalkanes with shorter carbon chains, e.g.,
n-propylcyclopentane (C8 cycloalkane) from 2-methoxy-4-n-
propylphenol (C9 backbone phenol). Hydrolysis of methoxy
groups selectively led to methanol.7 These results suggest that
the one-pot approach with two catalytic functions can be
applied for widely diverse phenolic monomer conversion.
To simulate real crude bio-oil, an equimolar mixture of
phenolic monomers including 4-n-propylphenol, 2-methoxy-
4-n-propylphenol and 4-allyl-2-methoxyphenol was hydro-
deoxygenated. After reactions (Fig. S2, ESIw), the metal and
acid catalysts were deposited in the bottom of the reactor and
a top hydrocarbon layer was formed. Thus catalysts and the
liquid phases can be easily separated. The process realized
nearly quantitative conversions with 100% selectivities to
hydrocarbons and methanol. No product from polymerization
among phenolic compounds was observed.
Notes and references
z For phenolic monomer hydrodeoxygenation: in
a typical test,
phenolic monomer (0.010 mol), Nafion/SiO2 (13 wt%, 0.80 g), freshly
prepared RANEYs Ni (0.30 g) and H2O (80 mL) were added to a Parr
reactor (reactor volume, 300 mL). After purging the reactor with H2, the
reaction was carried out with 4 MPa H2 (room temperature) at 473 K
for 0.5 h or 573 K for 2 h at a stirring speed of 1000 rpm. After reaction,
the reactor was cooled to room temperature. Ethyl acetate was used to
extract the organic mixture and the aqueous phase was also gathered.
The aqueous and organic layers were both analyzed by GC and
GC–MS. Gas chromatography (GC) and GC-mass spectroscopy
(GC–MS) analysis were performed on a Shimadzu 2010 gas chromato-
graph with a flame ionization detector (FID) and a Shimadzu QP 2010S
GC-mass spectroscope, both equipped with a 30 m (0.25-mm-i.d) HP-5
column. Internal standards (i.e., 2-isopropylphenol for the organic
phase and acetone for the aqueous phase) were used to determine the
product amount and carbon balance. The gas phase products were
analyzed by GC (HP 6890, Porapak Q column, FID). The calculations
of conversion and selectivity were based on mol carbon basis.
Conversion = (amount of raw material changes/total amount of
aromatic compounds in the starting material) ꢂ 100%. Selectivity =
(C atom in each product/total C atoms in the products) ꢂ 100%. The
carbon balance is better than 94 ꢃ 3% in this work.
1 S. Czernik and A. V. Bridgwater, Energy Fuels, 2004, 18, 590.
2 S. Czernik, D. Johnson and S. Black, Biomass Bioenergy, 1994, 7,
187.
3 (a) R. D. Cortright, R. R. Davda and J. A. Dumesic, Nature, 2002,
418, 964; (b) G. W. Huber, J. W. Shabaker and J. A. Dumesic,
Science, 2003, 300, 2075; (c) N. Yan, C. Zhao, C. Luo, P. J. Dyson,
H. Liu and Y. Kou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 8714; (d) C. Zhao,
W. J. Gan, X. B. Fan, Z. P. Cai and P. J. Dyson amd Y. Kou,
J. Catal., 2008, 254, 244; (e) N. Yan, C. Zhao, P. J. Dyson, C. Wang,
L. Liu and Y. Kou, ChemSusChem, 2008, 1, 626.
4 M. Garcia-Perez, A. Chaala, H. Pakdel, D. Kretschmer and
C. Roy, Biomass Bioenergy, 2007, 31, 222.
5 (a) E. G. Baker and D. C. Elliott, US Pat., 5 180 868, 1993;
(b) E. Laurent and B. Delmon, J. Catal., 1994, 146, 281;
(c) E. Furimsky and F. E. Massoth, Catal. Today, 1999, 52, 381;
(d) J. S. Shabtai, W. W. Zmierczak and E. Chornet, US Pat.,
5 959 167, 1999.
6 (a) S. Vitolo, M. Seggiani, P. Frediani, G. Ambrosini and L. Politi,
Fuel, 1999, 78, 1147; (b) S. Vitolo, B. Bresci, M. Seggiani and
M. G. Gallo, Fuel, 2001, 80, 17.
7 C. Zhao, Y. Kou, A. A. Lemonidou, X. Li and J. A. Lercher,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3987.
8 M. A. Harmer and Q. Sun, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 221, 45.
9 S. Kotrel, J. H. Lunsford and H. Knozinger, J. Phys. Chem. B,
2001, 105, 3917.
10 (a) T. Okuhara, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102, 3641; (b) G. Sartori and
R. Maggi, Chem. Rev., 2006, 106, 1077.
11 J. Relvas, R. Andrade, F. G. Freire, F. Lemos, P. Araujo,
M. J. Pinho, C. P. Nunes and F. R. Ribeiro, Catal. Today, 2008,
133–135, 828.
12 A. Chojecki, M. Veprek-Heijman, T. E. Muller, P. Scharringer,
S. Veprek and J. A. Lercher, J. Catal., 2007, 245, 237.
13 L. A. Zhang, G. H. Xu, Y. An, C. P. Chen and Q. D. Wang, Int. J.
Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31, 2250.
The detailed reaction pathway for hydrodeoxygenation of
phenolic compounds in which the noble metal catalyzes the
hydrogenation of the aromatic ring and of cycloalkene and
H3PO4 catalyzes ether hydrolysis and alcohol dehydration has
been explored previously.7 In the present fully heterogeneous
catalyst combination, RANEYs Ni acts as the hydrogenation
metal catalyst and Nafion/SiO2 acts as the Brønsted solid
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
414 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 412–414