14
J.A. Anderson et al. / Journal of Catalysis 270 (2010) 9–15
ethanol. However, no ring hydrogenation was observed and the
loss of selectivity was mainly a consequence of formation of ether
and methylene groups at the external function [28]. Reactions in
this study performed in aprotic solvents over Pd/CNF and Pd/AC
(Table 5) gave only phenyl 1-ethanol and ethyl benzene consistent
with the results using n-hexane as a solvent [28]. The results using
water, with a dielectric constant of 80, higher than any solvent em-
ployed by Malyala in their studies of acetophenone [28], show that
the selectivity towards products arising from the hydrogenation of
external functional group dropped from 100% (Table 5) to 40.3%
(Table 3) with the remaining products resulting from hydrogena-
tion of the aromatic ring. Similarly, the hydrogenation of benzalde-
hyde which produced only benzyl alcohol and toluene in aprotic
solvent (Table 5) produced mainly products arising from ring
hydrogenation when the reaction was performed in water (Table
3).
In addition to solvation effects, limiting interaction between the
hydrogenating Pd surface and the polar, reducible functional
group, high selectivities towards ring hydrogenation partially arise
due to enhance reaction rates of ring hydrogenation in water com-
pared with aprotic solvents. The observation of enhanced reaction
rates of benzoic acid over Ru/C and Rh/C by addition to water was
made by Rylander [6] and is entirely consistent with observations
made here (Fig. 1) where the conversion of benzoic acid in water,
dioxane and mixtures of the two, showed reaction rates to be
greater in water. Note that the differences cannot be attributed
to hydrogen availability since the mole fraction of hydrogen in
water is approximately an order of magnitude less than it is in
dioxane. (Mole fraction in water at 15 Bar (assuming Henry’s law
holds) is 1.965 Â 10À4 whereas the value can be calculated as
3.585 Â 10À3 for dioxane. Value for water at 333 K quoted in [29]
and calculated at 333 K for dioxane using the relationship,
lnx = À5.7347–8.6743/(T/100 K) [29].)
(1 1 1) when it is completely solvated by water [33]. It is not clear
at this stage whether it is as benzoic acid or as the benzoate anion
that the species undergoing hydrogenation is present.
Although the strong solvation of the external polar functional
group in water was sufficient to orientate the molecule in such a
manner that preferred adsorption mode was through the aromatic
ring (Fig. 2), leading to reduced selectivities to the functional group
hydrogenated product which had been favoured in aprotic solvent,
external groups such as the olefinic unit in cinnamic acid, which
are readily hydrogenated over Pd catalysts [14], did not appear
to receive significant protection.
5. Conclusions
Aromatic compounds with highly polar functional groups such
as acids and amides undergo preferred ring hydrogenation where
the rate of ring hydrogenation is enhanced compared to reaction
in aprotic solvents due to a combination of strong solvation of
the polar side group and solvent-assisted orientation of the ring
on the metal surface which favoured hydrogenation. The nature
of the carbon support has little influence in this reaction. Less polar
functional groups which were more prone to hydrogenation in
aprotic solvents were less susceptible to reaction in water, which
again enhanced the relative rate of hydrogenation of the aromatic
ring, leading to considerable differences in selectivity in the two
types of solvent.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Commonwealth Scholarship Commission for a
fellowship (to A.A.) and the Carnegie Trust for the Universities of
Scotland for summer studentships awards (to A.Mc, F.E.I. and
M.S.). We also greatly appreciate initial discussions with Prof. An-
gel Linares-Solano, Carbon Materials and Environmental Research
Group, Departamento de Quimica Inorganica, Universidad de Ali-
cante, Spain regarding the use of pretreated carbon nanotubes
and for supplying these for preliminary investigations.
Increased rate of ring hydrogenation can be attributed to
favourable orientation of the aromatic ring on the metal surface
brought about by solvation of the polar functional group, and ori-
entation of the ring due to the local structure of water in the prox-
imity of the surface. The orientation of the molecule via solvation
effects is known and may be exemplified by the case of methanol
on Pt(1 1 1) where in the vapour phase, the methanol interacts
with the surface though the oxygen atom, whereas on the intro-
duction of water, methanol twists through 90° to allow the CH
bond to interact with the surface [30]. This is driven by a desire
of the molecule to maximise methanol–water interactions of the
polar groups. Similar scenarios leading to preferential ring down
adsorption (Fig. 2) would explain the selectivity effects observed
leading to increased ring hydrogenation relative to function group
hydrogenation in water (Table 3) in cases where the functional
group undergoes facile hydrogenation in aprotic solvents (Table
5). However, the enhanced reaction rate (increased conversion)
in water compared to aprotic solvent of molecules containing func-
tional groups not readily hydrogenated such as benzamide (Tables
3 and 5) and benzoic acid (Fig. 1) suggests that additional factors
are involved. On surfaces such as Pt, Pd and Rh employed here,
water is known to form ordered overlayers as a consequence of
the ability of water to wet the metal surfaces as predicted by the
hydrophilicity or wettability parameter, w, as described by Meng
References
[1] U.M. Lindström (Ed.), Organic Reactions in Water, Blackwell Publishing,
Singapore, 2007.
[2] G.-J. ten Brink, I.W.C.E. Arends, R.A. Sheldon, Science 287 (2000) 1637.
[3] V.L. Budarin, J.H. Clark, R. Luque, D.J. Macquarrie, Chem. Commun. (2007) 634.
[4] R. Breslow, D. Rideout, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 102 (1980) 7816.
[5] S. Otto, J.B.F.N. Engberts, Pure Appl. Chem. 72 (2000) 1365.
[6] P.N. Rylander, Catalytic Hydrogenation over Platinum Metals, Academic Press,
New York, 1967.
[7] Y. Sun, R.N. Landau, J. Wang, C. LeBlond, D.G. Blackmond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118
(1996) 1348.
[8] B.K. Pradhan, N.K. Sandle, Carbon 37 (1999) 1323.
[9] M.L. Toebes, F.F. Prinsloo, J.H. Bitter, A.J. van Dillen, K.P. de Jong, J. Catal. 214
(2003) 78.
[10] F. Coloma, A. Sepulveda-Escribano, J.L.G. Fierro, F. Rodríguez-Reinoso, Appl.
Catal. A 150 (1995) 165.
[11] B. Bachiller-Baeza, A. Guerrero-Ruiz, I. Rodríguez-Ramos, Appl. Catal. A 192
(2000) 289.
[12] D. Jin Suh, T.-J. Park, S.-K. Ihm, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 31 (1992) 1850.
[13] J.A. Anderson, F.-M. McKenna, A. Linares-Solano, R.P.K. Wells, Catal. Lett. 119
(2007) 16.
[14] H.-U. Blaser, A. Indolese, A. Schnyder, H. Steiner, M. Studer, J. Mol. Catal. A 173
(2001) 3.
et al. [31] w = E
HB/DEads, where the numerator denotes the
[15] B. Chen, U. Dingerdissen, J.G.E. Krauter, H.G.J. Lansink Rotgerink, K. Möbus, D.J.
Ostgard, P. Panster, T.H. Riermeier, S. Seebald, T. Tacke, H. Trauthwein, Appl.
Catal. A 280 (2005) 17.
[16] R.L. Augustine, Catal. Rev. Sci. Eng. 13 (1976) 285.
[17] E.J. Grootendorst, R. Pestman, R.M. Koster, V. Ponec, J. Catal. 148 (1994) 261.
[18] T. Yokoyama, N. Yamagata, Appl. Catal. A 221 (2001) 227.
[19] D. Gaude, R.L. Goaller, J.-L. Luche, J.-L. Pierre, Tetrahedron Lett. (1984) 5897.
[20] Snia Viscosa, Italian Patent, IE1122161/1968.
water–water hydrogen bond strengths and the denominator de-
notes the calculated adsorption energy for water on the different
metals. Although such a semi-rigid layer at the metal surface
may impose a barrier to the solute molecule in terms of transport,
this layer may also enhance reactivity by localising (and orientat-
ing) the surface species close to the metal and stabilising partial
charges in the transition or product states [32]. For example, the
acetate anion is stabilised by an additional 57 kJ molÀ1 on Pd
[21] H. Wang, F. Zhao, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 8 (2007) 628.
[22] J. Sá, G.D. Arteaga, R.A. Daley, J. Bernardi, J.A. Anderson, J. Phys. Chem. 110
(2006) 17090.