Oxidation of Aromatic Sulfides
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 62, No. 12, 1997 4017
ously described.10 Phenethyl phenyl sulfide (4) was prepared
2
incorporated into the benzaldehyde. Clearly, TiO basic
from the reaction of phenethyl bromide with thiophenol as
sites are not only involved in the deprotonation process
but also in the subsequent steps leading to the R-hydroxy
sulfide.
It seems reasonable to suggest that the oxygenated
2
sites of TiO also react with the sulfur atom of the radical
cation, thus explaining the remarkable finding that
sulfoxides are formed in substantial amounts in the
reactions of 3-5, either when the irradiations were
carried out under nitrogen or when (photooxidation of 3
and 5) the solutions were previously deoxygenated by the
still more efficient freeze-thaw technique, which makes
very unlikely a reaction of the sulfide radical cation with
adventitious oxygen. Moreover, the possibility can also
9
1
described before [ H-NMR δ 7.35-7.10 (m, 10H, ArH), 3.15
(
m, 2H, CH ), 2.90 (m, 2H, CH ); MS m/ z (rel intensity) 214
2
2
+
M , 123 (100), 105, 91, 77, 65, 51, 45]. 4-Methoxybenzyl
phenyl sulfoxide came from a previous study.
17
P h otoch em ica l Oxid a tion . Reactions have been carried
out, at room temperature, by external irradiation (500 W high-
pressure mercury lamp, Pyrex filter), under magnetic stirring
2
and gentle N bubbling, of an acetonitrile solution (25 mL) of
substrate (0.3 mmol), in the presence of TiO
Ag SO (0.3 mmol); the reactor was a cylindrical flask (i.d. )
.6 cm, h ) 16 cm) equipped with a water cooling jacket and
2
(130 mg) and
2
4
1
intensive condenser. The photooxidation of 3 and 5 was also
performed in a water-cooled Schlenk tube, freezing, degassing
in the vacuum, and thawing the reaction mixture (for three
times) before the irradiation. After double paper filtration of
2
be excluded that traces of H O present in the solvent play
a significant role in the sulfoxides formation since only
negligible amounts of 18O were found in the produced
sulfoxide when the photooxidation of 5 was carried out
2
TiO , the reaction mixture was poured into water and ex-
tracted with ether. The reaction product analysis was per-
formed by 1H-NMR in the presence of an internal standard
(1,4-dimethoxybenzene or 1,2-diphenylethane). The amount
1
8
15
in MeCN to which 0.5% of H
2
O was added.
1
of unreacted substrate was determined, when possible, by H-
Finally, we have also studied the photooxidation of
NMR of the crude product or by GC analysis of reaction
mixture before workup, in the presence of an internal standard
4
-methoxybenzyl phenyl sulfoxide (6), which led to the
formation of 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, N-(4-methoxyben-
(
9
1,2-diphenylethane). Material balance was always ca. 85-
zyl)acetamide, and diphenylthiosulfonate (Table 1, entry
5% vs the amount of starting substrate.
•
+
9
). Clearly, 6 exclusively undergoes C-S bond cleavage
Rea ction P r od u cts. The crude reaction product was
to form a benzyl carbocation and the sulfinyl radical,
chromatographed on silica gel eluting with n-hexane, n-
hexane:ethyl ether (from 9:1 to 1:1 v/v), ethyl ether, and
chloroform. The structure of isolated products (benzaldehyde,
4-methoxybenzaldehyde, phenylacetaldehyde, benzyl phenyl
sulfoxide, benzil 4-methoxyphenyl sulfoxide, 4-methoxybenzyl
phenyl sulfoxide, diphenyl sulfoxide, phenethyl phenyl sulfox-
ide, benzyl alcohol, 4-methoxybenzyl alcohol, N-(4-methoxy-
benzyl)acetamide, diphenyl disulfide, and phenyl benzeneth-
iosulfonate) was attributed by comparison with authentic
•
PhSO ; the latter, by dimerization followed by rearrange-
ment, is converted in PhSSO
2
Ph.16 A similar result has
recently been observed also in the homogeneous oxidation
of 6 by Co(III).17 The predominance of the C-S bond
cleavage path with respect to deprotonation in the
sulfoxide radical cation, an outcome opposite to that
observed with sulfides radical cations, is certainly due
•
to the much greater stability of PhSO with respect to
10,17,18
specimens, commercial or available from previous works.
•
16
PhS .
18O.
2
P h ot och em ica l Oxid a t ion in t h e P r esen ce of H
The photooxidations of 1 and 5 were also carried out in MeCN:
1
8
Exp er im en ta l Section
1H-NMR spectra were obtained on a 200 MHz spectrometer
2
H O (99.5:0.5), and the reaction mixture was analyzed by
GC-MS. From the comparison of the MS spectrum of ben-
zaldehyde obtained from 1 [MS m/ z (rel intensity) 105 (60),
06 (58), 107 (100), 108 (87)] and that of commercial benzal-
dehyde [105 (100), 106 (85), 107 (7)] a molar ratio PhCH O/
PhCH O ) 1.5 was determined. The comparison for diphenyl
sulfoxide produced from 6 [MS m/ z (rel intensity) 202 (100),
03 (14), 204 (12), 205 (2)] and that of commercial diphenyl
sulfoxide [MS m/ z (rel intensity) 202 (100), 203 (15), 204 (6),
in CDCl . GC-MS analyses were performed on an instrument
3
1
equipped with a 20 m × 0.2 mm silica capillary column coated
18
with 5% diphenyl- and 95% dimethylpolysiloxane from 45 to
16
3
00 °C, connected with a mass selective detector at 70 eV. GC
analyses were carried on an identical capillary column from
5 to 280 °C. The water amount in MeCN was determined
with a Karl Fischer coulometer.
Ma ter ia ls. TiO (anatase, dried at 110 °C), Ag
2
4
18
2
05 (1)] showed that only 5% of the original H
incorporated in the former compound.
2
O was
2
2
SO
O (91 atom % O), and diphenyl sulfide
were commercially available. Benzyl phenyl sulfide (1),
-methoxybenzyl phenyl sulfide (2), and benzyl 4-methoxy-
phenyl sulfide (3) were prepared and characterized as previ-
4
, MeCN
1
8
18
(
HPLC grade), H
2
Ack n ow led gm en t. This work has been carried out
with the contribution of the Ministry of University and
Technological Research (MURST) and the National
Council of Research (CNR).
4
(
15) After this addition, ca. 96% of the water present in the solvent
O since our MeCN already contained 0.02% H O (Karl Fischer
2 2
18
is H
coulometric titration).
16) Kice, J . L. In Free radicals; Kochi, J . K., Ed.; J ohn Wiley and
Sons: New York, 1973; Vol. 2, pp 715-718.
17) Baciocchi, E.; Lanzalunga, O.; Marconi, F. Tetrahedron Lett.
994, 35, 9771-9774.
J O9615559
(
(
(18) Baciocchi, E.; Piermattei, A.; Ruzziconi, R. Synth. Commun.
1988, 18, 2167-2170.
1