3
2
8
M. Wilhelm et al. ■Phenylmercury Chloride
(9 = 52.0°: 97.2%; reflections: 4093 collected, 385 in-
The initial concentrations were ca. 130 mM DC1 and
100 mM HgPh2. Starting immediately after the addition
of the DC1, a series of l3C NMR spectra was recorded at
37 °C over a period of 3 h. The relative concentrations of
HgPh2 and the reaction product PhHgCl were estimated
from the peak heights of the signals of the ortho-C atoms.
HgPh2: 6 = 128.36 ip-C), 128.91 (m-C), 138.44 (o-C),
171.54 (ipso-C)\ PhHgCl: 6 = 129.35 (p-C), 129.49 (m-
C), 137.24 (o-C), 150.74 (ipso-C)\ [Dg]dioxan as internal
standard at 6 = 66.50.
In a further experiment, an analogous sample was pre-
pared which contained, however, twice the amount of
DC1. Hence, the ratio of DC1 to HgPh2 was sufficiently
high to allow the hypothetical transformation of HgPh2
to HgCl2 to proceed completely. After the sample had
stood at 37 °C for 14 d, HgPh2 was no longer detectable
by NMR spectroscopy. The solvent was evaporated, and
the white solid residue was dried in vacuo. Cl analysis:
calcd for HgCl2: 26.1%, for PhHgCl: 11.3%; found for
the residue: 10.9%.
dependent (/?int = 0.0503), 376 observed [I > 2cr(/)]; nu-
merical absorption correction, min./max. transmission:
0
0
.0351/0.5444, refinement on F2, 36 parameters, R 1 =
.0173 [/ > 2cr(/)], wR2 = 0.0439 (all data), max./min.
residual electron density: +1.62/—0.61 eA- \ All non-
hydrogen atoms were anisotropically refined. The hy-
drogen atoms were included on idealized positions. Pro-
grams used were the SHELX-97 program package [16]
and DIAMOND [24], Further details of the structure
determination have been deposited with the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cam-
bridge CB2 1EZ, UK (fax: (+44)1223-336-033; e-mail:
deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk), and may be obtained by quot-
ing the deposition no. CCDC 135477, the authors' names
and the literature citation.
Reaction o f diphenylmercury with hydrochloric acid
A typical experiment, in which the time course of the
reaction between HgPh2 and DC1 was studied, was con-
ducted as follows. HgPh2 (44 mg, 125 /imol) was dis-
solved in D20 / [Da]dioxan (0.20 ml /1.00 ml) in an NMR
sample tube. An initial l3C NMR spectrum (75 MHz) was
recorded at 37 °C. After addition of a 20% solution of DC1
in D20 (24.4 p\, 157 /imol), the sample was kept at 37 °C.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemein-
schaft (DFG) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
for financial support.
[1] E. Dreher, R. Otto, Ber. Dt. Chem. Ges. 2, 542 (1869);
R. Otto, Ber. Dt. Chem. Ges. 2, 641 (1869).
[13] Dihydrolipoic acid can be regarded as a potential SH-
source.
[
2] See for example: “Synthetic Methods of Organometallic
and Inorganic Chemistry (Hermann/Brauer)”, Ed. W. A.
Herrmann, Vol. 5, p. 233ff, Thieme, Stuttgart (1999).
3] V. I. Pakhomov, Zh. Strukt. Khim. 4, 594 (1963); C. A. 59,
[14] PhHg(SH) appears to be an isolable compound: M. Döring,
G. Hahn, M. Stoll, A. C. Wolski, Organometallics 16, 1879
(1997); I. A. Koten, R. Adams, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 46,
2764 (1924). For the first structurally characterized mer-
cury complex with a terminal SH~ ligand see: U. Brand,
J. R. Shapley, Inorg. Chem. 37, 5697 (1998).
[15] B. M. Segal, H. R. Hoveyda, R. H. Holm, Inorg. Chem.
37, 3440(1998).
[
1
0839c (1963).
4] J. Fayos, G. Artioli, R. Torres, J. Crystallogr. Spectrosc.
Res. 23, 595 (1993).
5] D. W. Nierenberg, R. E. Nordgren, M. B. Chang, R. W.
[
[
Siegler, M. B. Blayney, F. Hochberg, T. Y. Toribara, E. Cer-
nichiari, T. Clarkson, New England J. Med. 338, 1672
[16] G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX-97, University of Göttingen
(1997).
(
1998).
6] H. Strasdeit, Nachr. Chem. Tech. Lab. 46, 846 (1998).
7] L. W. Chang in “Toxicology of Metals”, Ed. L. W. Chang,
p. 512f, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1996).
[17] Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), Version 5.15
(April 1998, 181309 entries); F. H. Allen, O. Kennard,
Chem. Des. Autom. News 8, 1 and 31 (1993).
[18] J. G. Wright, M. J. Natan, F. M. MacDonnell, D. M. Ral-
ston, T. V. O’Halloran, Prog. Inorg. Chem. 38, 323 (1990)
and literature cited therein.
[
[
[
8] H. Strasdeit, A. von Döllen, W. Saak, M. Wilhelm, Angew.
Chem., in press.
[
9] J. G. Forte in “Comprehensive Human Physiology”, Eds.
R. Greger, U. Windhorst, Vol. 2, Chapter 61, Springer,
Berlin (1996).
[19] G. A. Jeffrey, J. R. Ruble, R. K. McMullan, J. A. Pople,
Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 414, 47 (1987).
[20] R. E. Dessy, G. F. Reynolds, J.-Y. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
[10] The crystal structure of this trinuclear complex is described
81,2683 (1959).
in [8],
[21] F. Kaufman, A. H. Corwin, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77,
6280(1955).
[22] N. L. Wolfe, R. G. Zepp, J. A. Gordon, G. L. Baughman,
Chemosphere 1, 273 (1972).
[
11] G. A. Razuvaev, S. F. Zhil’tsov, G. I. Anikanova, T. V.
Guseva, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 225, 336 (1975); Engl,
transl.: Dokl. Chem. 225, 637 (1976).
[
12] El mass spectra of PhHgCl are available on the Internet via
[23] M. Wilhelm, W. Saak, H. Strasdeit, manuscript in prepa-
ration.
the following URLs:
a) http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/name-ser.htm;
b) http://www.aist.go.jp/RIODB/SDBS/menu-e.html.
[24] DIAMOND - Visual Crystal Structure Information Sys-
tem, Version 2.1, CRYSTAL IMPACT, Bonn (1999).
Brought to you by | New York University Bobst Library Technical Services
Authenticated
Download Date | 7/10/15 7:04 PM