There are some standard synthetic routes to nitrones.4,5 The
majority of the reactions forming nitrones are dehydration
reactions of substituted hydroxylamine and carbonyl com-
pounds using anhydrous conditions and/or a dehydrating
agent.
Table 1. Nitrone Formation Reaction in Water
We hereby report for the first time the formation of nitrone
in water followed by its cycloaddition. The proposed model
of nitrone formation, the dehydration reaction, using sub-
stituted hydroxylamine and aldehydes in the presence of
surfactant (both anionic, i.e., SDS and cationic, i.e., CTAB)
as a catalyst is shown in Figure 1.
entry
A
time (h)
yield (%)
1
2
3
surfactant
1
>48
>48
>90
10% MeOH
10
cycloaddition reaction, the control of regioselctivity favors
the formation of 5-substituted isomer.
In our reaction system, phenyl hydroxylamine was reacted
with various aldehydes (5 min of sonication followed by
stirring; without sonication, the reaction took a longer time)11
to form nitrone. The disappearance of aldehyde and appear-
ance of nitrone was monitored by TLC. In the case of
1
cinnamaldehyde, nitrone was isolated and detected by H
NMR and mass spectrometry. In other cases, after the
formation of nitrone, the dipolarophile (ethyl acrylate) was
directly added to the system and the reaction was allowed
Figure 1. Proposed model of the dehydration reaction in water in
the presence of catalyst (surfactant SDS or CTAB).
6
,11
to take place at room temperature (Table 2).
Yields are generally very good (71-91%), except in one
case, i.e., the 2,5-dimethoxy phenyl system. This may be
due to the activated ring system, which reduces the carbonyl
character. Between the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and
cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), the latter cata-
lyzes the reaction better, presumably due to stronger binding
of the CTAB with the substrate, which is expected as CTAB
has much more hydrocarbon content in its core region than
The emulsion droplets have a hydrophobic interior, through
hydrophobic interaction. Therefore, the equilibrium position
for the hydrophobic substrate would lie at the product side
because, as the water molecule forms under the reaction
conditions, it would be ejected from the core of the droplets.
The formation of emulsion droplets in the reaction medium
was confirmed by optical microscopy (Figure 2).
(
5) (a) Tennant, G. In ComprehensiVe Organic Chemistry; Barton, D.,
Ollis, W. D., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford. 1979; Vol. 2, p 385. (b) Padwa,
A. In New Synthetic Methods; Verlag Chemie: New York; 1979; Vol. 5.
(c) Voinov, M. A.; Grigorev, I. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 2445. (d)
Alibe, R.; Blanco, P.; March, P.; Figueredo, M.; Font, J.; Alvarez-Larena,
A.; Piniella, J. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 523. (e) Iwasa, S.; Maeda,
H.; Nishiyama, K.; Tsusima, S.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Nishiyama, H. Tetrahedron
2
002, 58, 8281.
1
(
6) All the isoxazolidine products in Table 2 were characterized by H
Figure 2. Optical micrograph of the reaction mixture.
13
and C NMR. The spectral data are included in Supporting Information.
7) (a) Rispens, T.; Engberts, J. B. F. N. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 7369.
b) Sepulveda, L. AdV. Collid. Interface Sci. 1986, 25, 1.
8) (a) Confalone, P. N.; Huie, E. M. In Organic Reactions; Kende, A.
(
(
(
We selected the reaction of o-nitro benzaldehyde and
phenyl hydroxylamine for the nitrone formation as a model
reaction in water (Table 1). This ensures that the surfactant
has the major role for the nitrone formation. During
S., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1988; Vol. 36, pp 1-173. (b)
Tufariello, J. J.; Ali, S. A.; Klingele, H. O. J. Org. Chem. 1979, 44, 4213.
(
9) (a) Kanemasa, S.; Ueno, N.; Shirahase, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002,
3, 657. (b) Merino, P.; Anoro, S.; Cerrada, E.; Laguna, M.; Moreno, A.;
Tejero, T. Molecules 2001, 6, 208.
10) Denis, C.; Laignel, B.; Plusquellec, D.; Marouille, J.-Y. Le.; Botrel,
4
(
A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37, 53.
ComprehensiVe Organic Synthesis, SelectiVity, Strategy, and Efficiency in
Modern Organic Chemistry; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon
Press: Oxford, 1991; Vol. 5, p 247. (d) Padwa, A. In ComprehensiVe
Organic Synthesis, SelectiVity, Strategy, and Efficiency in Modern Organic
Chemistry; Trost, B. M., Fleming, I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991;
Vol. 4, p 1076. (e) Tufariello, J. J. In 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry;
Padwa, A., Ed.; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1984; p 83. (f) Padwa, A.
In 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry; Padwa, A., Ed.; Wiley-Inter-
science: New York, 1984; p 277. (g) Balasubramanian, N. Org. Prep. Proc.
Int. 1985, 17, 23. (h) Gothelf, K. V.; Jorgensen, K. A. Chem. ReV. 1988,
(11) General Reaction Procedure. To a solution of surfactant (SDS or
CTAB, 0.05 mmol) in H2O (2 mL) were added an aldehyde (0.5 mmol)
and phenyl hydroxylamine (0.6 mmol, 1.2 equiv) successively at room
temperature in a 25 mL round-bottom flask. The reaction was sonicated
for 5 min and then stirred at room temperature. The reaction was monitored
by TLC. After the disappearance of aldehyde, ethyl acrylate (1 mmol, 0.1
mL) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature.
After stirring at the same temperature for the period of time listed in Table
2, the product was extracted with ethyl acetate, washed with brine, dried
over Na2SO4, and concentrated, and purification by silica gel chromatog-
raphy gave the desired product(s). In the reaction in which no sonication
was used, the reaction required more time (5-6 times) for completion. It
is well-known that sonication favors the formation of organized media.
88, 863. (i) Kanemasa, S.; Uemura, T.; Wada, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 1992,
33, 7889. (j) Kanemasa, S.; Tsuruoka, T.; Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron Lett.
1995, 36, 5019.
3968
Org. Lett., Vol. 5, No. 21, 2003