256
A. Deshpande et al. / Journal of Catalysis 275 (2010) 250–256
Table 5
here after 8 h is comparable to that reported for the current indus-
trial process after 3 h [25]. It can be pointed out that the industrial
process is based on sulphuric acid and this higher activity can be ac-
counted for by the higher density of protons in sulphuric acid com-
pared to any solid acid. The lower rate of the all heterogeneous
process is however compensated by the significant reduction in
the e-factor induced by the elimination of the liquid acid and a
much simpler separation of the products.
Comparison of a few solid acids for the isomerisation of phenylhydroxylamine at
353 K. 109 mg of PHA added to 7 mL of water reacted in the presence of 0.1 g of solid
acid, giving PAP, o-aminophenol, aniline and nitrobenzene.
Sample
Reaction time (min)
PHA conv.
PAP sel.
BEA zeolite
30
30
60
30
60
30
60
30
30
60
49.1
100.0
33.6
35.1
47.3
23.2
40.0
100.0
21.8
39.1
61.6
29.8
94.8
99.9
96.8
97.0
92.1
99.6
94.5
95.2
Sulphated TiO2 (calc. 773 K)
ZrS (from LOBA zirconia)
ZrS-exZrOCl2 (calc. 893 K)
ZrSAD-1 (calc. 923 K)
4. Conclusions
ZrSAD-3 (calc. 893 K
ZrS MEL-999/1 (calc. 923 K)
An all heterogeneous process for the bi-functional conversion of
nitrobenzene into p-aminophenol has been described, using the
combination of zirconium sulphate and supported platinum. The
reaction kinetics is characteristic of a bi-functional mechanism,
in which the slow step is the hydrogenation of NB to PHA at low
Pt content and the isomerisation of PHA to PAP at high Pt loading.
This system requires only very small amounts of Pt, and the sup-
port of Pt is not important. The most critical point is the choice
of the solid acid, which must be selective for the Bamberger rear-
rangement. This rearrangement has been shown to be very
demanding, and the strong effect of the calcination temperature
illustrates this point. Strong solid acids are not good catalysts for
this process.
Table 6
Experiments in
sulphate, at 353 K, pressure 20 bar.
a
700 ml reactor, using a mixture of 2% Pt/ZrO2 and zirconium
Exp.
no.
NB
Water
(mL)
Time
(h)
NB conv.
(%)
PAP Sel.
(%)
AN Sel.
(%)
(mL)
1
2
3
4
5
6
40
40
56
56
56
56
490
350
490
490
490
490
6
8
6
6
8
8
33.8
97
27.2
22.8
84.5
86.7
91.9
86
93.1
90.8
87.0
88.1
8.1
14
6.9
9.2
13.0
11.9
Acknowledgments
Mechanical mixture of catalysts: experiments 1 and 2: 2% Pt/ZrO2 (0.1 g), ZRS (5 g);
experiments 3–6: 2% Pt/ZrO2 (0.14 g), ZRS (7 g).
We thank M.M. Aouine for the investigations by TEM and the
analytical service of IRCELyon and SCA-Solaise for chemical and
textural analysis. We also thank Cefipra for funding this work in
the frame of the Franco-Indian cooperation.
3 calcined at most at 923 K. This catalyst can reach high conversion
of PHA with high selectivity, and the same behaviour is observed in
the hydrogenation of NB. This comparison shows that the loss of
selectivity occurs in the second step, the isomerisation of PHA. It
is surprising that strong acids such as sulphated zirconias give poor
results in the Bamberger rearrangement, when the industrial pro-
cess uses sulphuric acid. It can be pointed out that the industrial
reaction is indeed performed in rather diluted sulphuric acid. It
has been reported long ago that Fe3+ at ppm levels catalyses the
decomposition of PHA by a redox mechanism [20]. It is also well
known that radicals can be formed on sulphated zirconias by oxi-
dation [21–24]. It can then be speculated that over sulphated zirco-
nias, the selectivity leak occurs by this oxidation path.
References
[1] P.N. Rylander, I.M. Karpenko, G.R. Pond, DE 2118369, 1971, to Engelhard.
[2] P.N. Rylander, I.M. Karpenko, G.R. Pond, DE 2118334, 1971, to Engelhard.
[3] D.C. Caskey, D.W. Chapman, EP 85890, 1983, to Mallinckrodt.
[4] J. Le Ludec, DE 2327412, 1973, to Rhone-Poulenc.
[5] J. Freudenreich, J. Stohrer, WO 9928289, 1999, to Consortium fur
Elektrochemische Industrie.
[6] A.H. Sharma, P. Hope, EP 147879, 1985, to AKZO.
[7] D.C. Caskey, D.W. Chapman, US 4571437, 1986, to Mallinckrodt.
[8] S.S. Sathe, US 4176138, 1979, to Mallinckrodt.
[9] R.V. Chaudhari, S.S. Divekar, M.J. Vaidya, C.V. Rode, US 6028227, 2000, to CSIR.
[10] S. Wang, Y. Ma, Y. Wang, W. Xue, X. Zhao, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 83
(2008) p. 1466.
[11] D. Groskova, M. Stolcova, M. Hronec, Catal. Lett. 69 (2000) 113.
[12] F. Figueras, A. Deshpande, L.K. Mannepalli, J.R. Katuri, S.R. Ragireddy, S.S.
Nujilla, EP 2058050, to CNRS, C.S.I.R, Vinati Organics Ltd., 2009.
[13] M.L. Kantam, H. Kochkar, J.M. Clacens, B. Veldurthy, A. Garcia-Ruiz, F. Figueras,
Appl. Catal. B 55 (2005) 177.
[14] P.N. Rylander, I.M. Karpenko, and G.R. Pond, FR 2092589, 1972, to
Engelhard.
[15] K.J. Ratnam, R.S. Reddy, N.S. Sekhar, M. Lakshmi Kantam, A. Deshpande, F.
Figueras, Appl. Catal. A. 348 (2008) 26.
3.6. Experiments in a larger reactor
The scale up of the results obtained in a small reactor to a larger
one offers better conditions for the determination of the material
balance and is fruitful only when diffusional limitations are
negligible; therefore, a few experiments have been performed in a
larger reactor (700 mL from Autoclave Engineers), using a concen-
tration of 1 mol LÀ1 of NB. Due to the separation of the organic/li-
quid phases at rest, the reactions were run for 6 or 8 h, then the
whole reaction mixture was transferred into a 1-l beaker, 100 ml
of methanol was added to obtain a homogeneous solution, which
was analysed by HPLC (ODH-C18 column, 250 mm, wave length
254 nm, 70:30 water/acetonitrile, flow 1 mL/min). The results re-
ported in Table 6 illustrate the reproducibility of the experiment
and show that a good selectivity can be reached at high conversion,
as was first observed in the small reactor. Indeed the yield obtained
[16] S.K. Tanielyan, J.J. Nair, N. Marin, G. Alvez, R.J. McNair, D. Wang, R.L. Augustine,
Org. Process Res. Dev. 11 (2007) 681.
[17] M. Boudart, W.C. Cheng, J. Catal. 106 (1987) 134.
[18] R.M. Koros, E.J. Nowak, Chem. Eng. Sci. 22 (1967) 470.
[19] R.J. Madon, M. Boudart, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fund. 21 (1982) 438.
[20] D. Mulvey, W.A. Waters, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2 (1977) 1868.
[21] A. Ghenciu, D. Farcasiu, J. Mol. Catal. A. 109 (1996) 273.
[22] A. Ghenciu, D. Farcasiu, Catal. Lett. 44 (1997) 29.
[23] A.F. Bedilo, M.A. Plotnikov, N.V. Mezentseva, A.M. Volodin, G.M. Zhidomirov,
I.M. Rybkin, K.J. Klabunde, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 7 (2005) 3059.
[24] A.F. Bedilo, A.M. Volodin, Kinet. Catal. 50 (2009) 314.
[25] D.C. Miller, WO 9325515, 1993, to Mallinckrodt.