V. Polshettiwar et al. / Tetrahedron 63 (2007) 6784–6790
6789
dissolved in 10 mL of acetonitrile in a Schlenk tube. The re-
action mixture was stirred under inert atmosphere at 80 ꢁC
for 24 h. After completion of reaction, solvent was evapo-
rated and product was washed with ether to remove excess
of (3-iodopropyl)triethoxysilane, to yield 4.2 g (92%) of
pure product. FTIR (KBr): 3157, 2975, 2930, 1650, 1564,
1077, 959 cmꢀ1; 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 0.55 (t, 2H), 1.16 (t,
9H), 1.94 (m, 2H), 3.24 (s, 6H), 3.71 (q, 6H), 4.26 (t, 2H),
6.97 (d, 2H), 8.27 (d, 2H) ppm; 13C NMR (CDCl3):
d 6.87, 18.35, 25.06, 40.80, 58.69, 59.90, 108.52, 142.29,
156.24 ppm; 29Si NMR (CDCl3): d ꢀ46.19 ppm; HRMS
(FAB+): calculated for C16H31O2N2Si (M+) 227.2104, found
227.2108.
All the prepared compounds are known and compared
with authentic sample.
4.5. General experimental procedure for cyanation
reactions
To a suspension of nanostructured hybrid silica catalyst
I-Pd (300 mg) in DMF (5 mL), aryl halide (1 mmol),
dry K4[Fe(CN)6] (0.7 mmol), triethylamine (2 mmol), and
dodecane as internal standard were added. The mixture
was refluxed for 24 h and was monitored by GLC. After
completion, the reaction mixture was filtered using What-
man filter paper. The crude product was dissolved in ethyl
acetate. The organic phase was washed with 10% HCl and
dried over sodium sulfate. Evaporation of solvent gives
crude product, which was confirmed by GC–MS. All the pre-
pared compounds are known and compared with authentic
sample.
4.2. Typical preparation of catalyst I-Pd
TEOS/N,N-dimethyl-pyridin-4-yl-(3-triethoxysilyl-propyl)-
ammonium iodide/H2O/NH4OH/N-methyl dodecyl imid-
azolium bromide were mixed in the ratio of 0.9:0.1:114:
8:0.12.12a In typical experimental procedure, template
N-methyl-N0-dodecyl-imidazolium bromide (0.32 g) was
dissolved in water (14 g) and ammonium hydroxide (7 g).
To this stirred solution, an organic sol–gel precursor N,N-di-
methyl-pyridin-4-yl-(3-triethoxysilyl-propyl)-ammonium
iodide (0.36 g) was added and stirred for 15 min, in which an
inorganic sol–gel precursor TEOS (1.6 mL) was added and
the mixture is stirred at 80 ꢁC for 2 days. The removal of
template was carried out by Soxhlet extraction of material
using ethanol (with 10% HCl) for 24 h. After template re-
moval, material was washed with ethanol and acetone, and
then dried. Two grams of this material was then stirred
with Pd(OAc)2 (0.14 g) in ethanol overnight. Pd(OAc)2 en-
capsulated catalyst was filtered and washed with ethanol,
acetone, and finally refluxed with acetonitrile to remove
traces of physically adsorbed Pd(OAc)2. Found elemental
analysis/%: C: 12.19, H: 2.12; N: 2.72; Si: 33.61; Pd: 3.62.
Si/Pd ratio found by scanning electron microscopy:
95.2:4.8. The amount of Pd(OAc)2 encapsulated was
0.34 mmol gꢀ1 based on elemental analysis.
Acknowledgements
V.P. thanks the ‘Direction de la recherche’, French Govern-
ment, for a postdoctoral fellowship.
Supplementary data
Full characterization of the organic precursor molecule and
the nanostructured heterogeneous catalyst are provided.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found
References and notes
1. Heck, R. F. Org. React. 1982, 27, 345–390.
2. (a) Sonogashira, K. J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 653, 46–49; (b)
Negishi, E.; Anastasia, L. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1979–2017;
(c) For a recent review on Pd-catalyzed cross-coupling reac-
tions, see: Nicolaou, K. C.; Bulger, P. G.; Sarlah, D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 4442–4489.
4.3. General experimental procedure for Heck reactions
To a suspension of heterogeneous catalyst I-Pd (300 mg)
in acetonitrile (10 mL), aryl halide (1 mmol), alkene
(1.5 mmol), triethylamine (2 mmol), and dodecane as inter-
nal standard were added. The mixture was refluxed for 24 h
and was monitored by GLC. After completion, the reaction
mixture was filtered using Whatman filter paper and the
solvent was evaporated. The crude product was dissolved
in diethyl ether. The organic phase was washed with 10%
HCl and dried over sodium sulfate. Evaporation of ether
gives crude product, which was confirmed by GC–MS and
liquid NMR. All the prepared compounds are known and
compared with authentic sample.
3. (a) Arhancet, J. P.; Davis, M. E.; Merola, J. S.; Hanson, B. E.
Nature 1989, 339, 454–455; (b) Sandee, A. J.; Slagt, V. F.;
Reek, J. N. H.; Kamer, P. C. J.; van Leeuwen, P. W. N. M.
Chem. Commun. 1999, 1633–1634.
4. (a) Horvath, I. T.; Rabai, J. Science 1994, 266, 72–75; (b) de
Wolf, E.; van Koten, G.; Deelman, B. J. Chem. Soc. Rev.
1999, 28, 37–41.
5. (a) Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071–2083; (b)
Wasserscheid, P.; Waffenschmidt, H.; Machnitzki, P.;
Kottsieper, K. W.; Stelzer, O. Organometallics 2000, 19,
3818–3823; (c) Zhao, D.; Fei, Z.; Geldbach, T. J.; Scopelliti,
R.; Dyson, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15876–15882;
(d) Xiao, J.; Twamley, B.; Shreeve, J. M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
3845–3847.
4.4. General experimental procedure for Sonogashira
reactions
€
6. (a) Klingelhofer, S.; Heitz, W.; Greiner, A.; Oesterreich, S.;
Forster, S.; Antonietti, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
€
The reactions were carried out in similar way as for Heck
reaction, by using catalyst I-Pd (300 mg, 0.1 mmol as
Pd(OAc)2), aryl iodide (1 mmol), alkynes (1.5 mmol), tri-
ethylamine (2 mmol), and dodecane as internal standard.
The mixture was refluxed for 24 h in acetonitrile at 80 ꢁC.
10116–10120; (b) Beletskaya, I. P.; Kashin, A. N.; Litvinov,
A. E.; Tyurin, V. S.; Valetsky, P. M.; van Koten, G.
Organometallics 2006, 25, 154–158.
7. (a) Phan, N. T. S.; Sluys, M. V. D.; Jones, C. W. Adv. Synth.
Catal. 2006, 348, 609–679; (b) Hamza, K.; Abu-Reziq, R.;