Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN CHEMISTRY
Magn. Reson. Chem. 2006; 44: 851–855
Published online 27 June 2006 in Wiley InterScience
Substituent effects on 15N and 13C NMR chemical shifts
of 3-phenylisoxazoles: a theoretical and spectroscopic
study
Mark H. Schofield,∗ Marie-Adele Sorel, Ryan J. Manalansan, David P. Richardson∗ and
J. Hodge Markgraf
Department of Chemistry, Williams College, Williamstown, MA 01267-2692, USA
Received 25 January 2006; Revised 27 April 2006; Accepted 2 May 2006
The synthesis and assignment of 15N and 13C NMR signals of the isoxazole ring in a series of para-
substituted 3-phenyl derivatives are reported. DFT calculations of 15N and 13C chemical shifts are
presented and compared to observed values. Substituent effects are interpreted in terms of the Hammett
correlation and calculated bond orders. Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
KEYWORDS: 13C NMR; 15N NMR; chemical shifts; HMBC; DFT calculations; natural resonance theory; electronic effects;
Hammett correlation; 3-phenylisoxazoles
methods using the B3LYP functional and 6–311CCG(2d,2p)
basis set, which have been shown to be effective for
the prediction of 13C and 15N chemical shifts,6 were also
employed. The theoretical component of this analysis also
permitted commentary on bond orders of the isoxazole
ring, a topic related to prior reports of electron densities
of isoxazoles.7
INTRODUCTION
The 3-phenylisoxazole (1,2-oxazole) unit constitutes an
important pharmacophore in a wide range of biologically
and agriculturally active compounds.1 Most of the reports
assessed the impact of a series of substituents on the desired
activity. Although substituent effects on 13C NMR spectral
assignments for 3-phenylisoxazoles (1) are unknown, such
correlations have been reported for related heterocycles: 3,5-
diphenylisoxazoles,2 2-phenyl-1,3,4-oxadiazoles,3 3-phenyl-
1,2,4-oxadiazoles,4 and 3-phenyl-1,2,5-oxadiazoles.5 In par-
ticular, the extensive studies of Baumstark and coworkers
on 3,5-diphenylisoxazoles established that para substituents
on the 5-phenyl ring (2a) significantly affected the chemical
shifts of isoxazole C-4 and C-5, while the same substituents
on the 3-phenyl ring (2b) exerted minimal effect on either of
these isoxazole ring carbons.2 Those studies did note, how-
ever, that C-3 of 2b was shielded by electron-withdrawing
substituents. The same effect was observed for C-2 of
oxadiazole 3 (see Fig. 1).3
In the NMR studies of the various oxazoles cited above,
only for 3 were 15N spectral assignments made.3 Those data
established a significant correlation for N-3 with electron-
releasing substituents. Given the comparable electronic
relationship between Y and N-2 and N-3 in 1 and 3,
respectively, and between X and C-4 in 2a, an NMR study of
a series of para-substituted 3-phenylisoxazoles (1a–1i) was
undertaken to probe the transmission of substituent effects.
To compare theory with experiment, density functional
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Syntheses
Conversion of para-substituted benzaldehyde oximes (4a–4i)
to 3-phenylisoxazoles (1a–1i) was carried out by a one-
pot procedure (Scheme 1). The 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
of benzonitrile N-oxides (5) to alkynes or to substituted
alkenes (as alkyne equivalents) is well documented.8 The
present method used phenyl vinyl sulfoxide and a solvent
at the boiling point of which intramolecular elimination of
phenylsulfenic acid occurred.9 This sequence constituted
a concise route to 3-phenylisoxazoles. The efficiency of
measuring 15N chemical shifts was increased by enhancing
the 15N content of 1a–1i to ca 20%.
15N NMR chemical shift analysis
The calculated and experimentally determined 15N chemical
shifts for our series of compounds, 1a–1i, are listed in Table 1,
arranged according to ꢀp values.10 As shown, the chemi-
cal shifts span a fairly narrow range (calculated: 11.0 ppm;
experimental: 13.3 ppm), with a trend in shifts that is con-
sistent with the electron-releasing or electron-withdrawing
ability of the phenyl para substituent. As expected, electron-
withdrawing groups cause a downfield shift (i.e., to less
negative values, since CH3NO2 is the chemical shift ref-
erence) while electron-releasing groups lead to an upfield
ŁCorrespondence to: Mark H. Schofield, Department of Chemistry,
Haverford College, 370 Lancaster Avenue, Haverford, PA
19041-1336, USA. E-mail: mschofie@haverford.edu
David P. Richardson, Department of Chemistry, Williams College,
47 Lab Campus Drive, Williamstown, MA 01267-2692, USA.
E-mail: david.p.richardson@williams.edu
Copyright 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.