Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
and 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPTMS, 85 wt%) were
purchased from Acros Chemical Inc. Phenol (C6H5OH, 99.98
wt%), formalin (HCHO, 37.0–40.0 wt%), tetraethylorthosilicate
(TEOS, minimum 98 wt%), ethanol (C2H5OH, minimum 99.7
wt%), acetone (CH3COCH3, minimum 99.5 wt%), hydrogen
chloride (HCl, 36.0–38.0 wt%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH,
minimum 96.0 wt%), sodium chloride (NaCl, minimum 99.5 wt
%), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2, 30 wt%), sulfuric acid (H2SO4,
95–98 wt%), butyraldehyde (C3H10CHO, minimum 98.5 wt%),
propionaldehyde (C2H5CHO, minimum 98 wt%), cyclohexanone
(C6H10O, minimum 99.5 wt%), ethylene glycol ((CH2OH)2,
minimum 99.9 wt%) and acetophenone (C8H8O, minimum 99.9
wt%) were obtained from Shanghai Chemical Company. 1,4-
butanediol (C4H10O2, 98 wt%) was obtained from Aladdin
Chemical Company. All chemicals were used as received without
any further purification. Water used in all syntheses was distilled
and deionized.
under vacuum overnight. The sulfonic-acid-functionalized
polymers were designated as MP-SO3H-x, wherein x is the
theoretical weight percentage of SO3H groups in the solids. The
theoretical calculation is based on the S molar content deter-
mined by elemental analysis, and assuming that all elemental S is
originating from the SO3H group. An alternative oxidation
procedure was also carried out. 2.04 g of 30 wt% H2O2 was mixed
with 1.0 g of MP-SO3H-27.4-BO sample, followed by the addi-
tion of 6.12 g of methanol. This sample was denoted as
MP-SO3H-27.4-w.
For comparison, the mesoporous polymer-based material
without sulfonic acid functional groups was synthesized, desig-
nated as MP, by the surfactant self-assembly of triblock
copolymer, low-polymerized phenolic resol and TEOS.36. The
mesoporous MP-SO3H-11.4* material was synthesized from the
initial solution containing 3.458 g of TEOS, 0.654 g of MPTMS,
2.0 g of phenolic resin and 3.2 g of F127. Carbonization heating
programs were taken from ambient temperature to 350 ꢂC with a
rate ꢂof 1 ꢂC minꢁ1, keeping this temperature for 1 h, from 350 to
2.2. Synthesis of mesoporous sulfonic acid functionalized
polymer-based solids
600 C with a rate of 1 C minꢁ1, and keeping this temperature
ꢂ
for 4 h to carbonize. The carbonized product MP-SO3H-
11.4*(600) was repeatedly washed with a NaOH solution (4 M)
The precursors were low-polymerized phenolic resins, and
3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, the coupling agent was
TEOS and the structure directing agent was triblock copolymer
F127.44 The low-polymerized phenolic resins were prepared
according to the established procedure (see details in ESI†). In a
typical synthesis, 3.458 g of TEOS and 0.654 g of MPTMS was
firstly pre-hydrolyzed in the presence of 2.0 g of HCl (0.2 M) and
10 g of ethanol for 30 min. At the same time, 2.0 g of Pluronic
F127 and 10 g of ethanol were mixed together to obtain a clear
solution. To it, the mixture of pre-hydrolyzed TEOS and
MPTMS and a solution containing 0.32 g of low-polymerized
phenolic resins and 1.28 g of ethanol were added in sequence.
After stirring for 2 h, the mixture was poured into multiple
dishes. The dishes were placed in a hood to evaporate ethanol at
ambient temperature for 6 h, and then in an oven to thermo-
polymerize at 100 ꢂC for 24 h. The as-made films were scratched
from the dishes. The triblock copolymer templates were removed
from as-made mesostructured composites by sulfuric acid
extraction under mechanical stirring (typically 1.0 g of mercapto-
functionalized polymers per 100 mL of 48 wt% sulfuric acid) at
90 ꢂC for 24 h.40,45 The resulting materials were filtered off,
washed with 100 mL of distilled water to remove the remainiꢂng
surfactant located on the material surface, and dried at 100 C
under vacuum. The extraction experiment was repeated by twice.
The organic functional thiol group contents could be tuned by
adjusting the added amounts of TEOS and MPTMS. It should be
noted that the optimal value for F127 varies with the ratio of
TEOS : MPTMS. The details for the synthesis are listed in ESI†,
Table S1. The functionalized mesoporous polymers were desig-
nated as MP-SO3H-x-BO (the x value is described below for
simplification, BO means before oxidation). Then an oxidation
step was carried out to oxidize thiol groups to sulfonic acid
groups. Typically, 1.0 g of MP-SO3H-x-BO was suspended in
30 g of aqueous 30% H2O2. The suspension was stirred at room
temperature for 24 h. The solid was filtered, then washed with
water and ethanol. The wet material was suspended again in
20 mL of H2SO4 (1 M) solution for 2 h. Finally, the material was
washed several times with water and ethanol and dried at 100 ꢂC
ꢂ
at 40 C to remove the silica component.
The mesoporous silica-based MSiO2-SO3H-19.4 material
was synthesized by the surfactant self-assembly of triblock
copolymer, MPTMS and TEOS, and all other procedures are
exactly the same as the MP-SO3H-x catalyst. The mesoporous
sulfonic acid functionalized silica-based solids were also prepared
according to the established methods of post-grafting.46,47 Firstly,
mesoporous silicates MCM-41 and SBA-15 were prepared. 1.5 g
of mesoporous silica support MCM-41 or SBA-15 was dispersed
in 50 mL of toluene. 3.6 g (0.018 mol) of MTPMS was added and
the mixture was refluxed at 110 ꢂC for 12 h. The solids were
collected by filtration, washed with toluene and air-dried. The
further oxidation step was exactly the same as that for the mes-
oporous polymer-based materials. These two samples were
denoted as MCM-SO3H and SBA-SO3H.
2.3. Characterization and measurements
The small-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were
taken on a Rigaku D/max B diffractometer using Cu Ka radia-
tion (40 kV, 20 mA). The d-spacing values were calculated by the
formula of d ¼ 0.15408/2sin q, and the unit cell parameters were
calculated from the formula of a0 ¼ 2d100/O3. N2 adsorption–
desorption isotherms were measured at 77 K with a Quantach-
rome NOVA 4000e analyzer. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller
(BET) method was utilized to calculate the specific surface areas
(SBET). By using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) model, the
pore volumes and pore size distributions were derived from the
adsorption branches of isotherms. The micropore volumes (Vm)
were calculated from the V–t plot method. The t values were
calculated as a function of the relative pressure using the de Boer
equation, t (nm) ¼ [0.1399/(log(p0/p) + 0.0340)]1/2. Vm was
obtained using the equation of Vm (cm3 gꢁ1) ¼ 0.001547I, where I
represents the Y intercept in the V–t plot. Transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) experiments were conducted on a JEOL 2011
microscope operated at 200 kV. The samples for TEM
measurements were suspended in ethanol and supported onto a
15876 | J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 15874–15886
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012