G. Tang et al.
Catalysis Communications 121 (2019) 43–47
absence of catalyst or hydrogen, confirming that both the IL catalyst
and molecular hydrogen were essential for this reaction (entries 1 and
2
, Table 1). Although two IL-regulating Ru(II) complexes catalysts
[
PEG-1000-C
BINAP-DPENDS] exhibited excellent activity and enantioselectivity for
hydrogenation of acetophenone, the [PEG-1000-C MIM][Ru-BINAP-
8
MIM][Ru-BINAP-DPENDS] and [PEG-1000-C12MIM][Ru-
8
DPENDS] with shorter carbon chain could not be completely separated
from the catalytic system even the temperature decreased to 0 °C (en-
tries 3 vs 4, Table 1). This revealed that the thermoregulated separation
behavior was dependent strongly on the hydrophobicity of cation
moiety, and the appropriate hydrogen bonding or hydrophobic inter-
actions between IL and solvent was very vital to offer the thermo-
morphic behavior [23,24]. The simple Ru(II) complex salt Ru-BINAP-
DPENDS afforded lower catalytic activity and enantioselectivity than
that of [PEG-1000-C12MIM][Ru-BINAP-DPENDS] (entries 4 vs 6,
Table 1) because of its poor miscibility with isopropanol.
Fig. 2. The conductivity as function of the concentration of the IL [PEG-1000-
C
12MIM][Ru-BINAP-DPENDS] in isopropanol at a) 0 °C, b) 30 °C and c) 40 °C.
The diphosphine ligand (S)-BINAP is very crucial to achieve high
enantioselectivity. When the Ru sites were coordinated with achiral
diphosphine ligand (1,3-Bis(diphenylphosphino)propane) (DPPP) and
chiral diamine ligand (S,S)-DPENDS, the resulting catalyst [PEG-1000-
2.2. Thermoregulated phase-separation
At first, the properties of the thermoregulated IL catalysts have been
C12MIM][Ru-DPPP-DPENDS] exhibited lower activity and enantios-
examined. As shown in Fig. S2a, before the reaction, the catalyst sank to
the bottom. However. After temperature arose to 40 °C in the presence
of base promoter and acetophenone, the reaction mixture became
homogeneous (Fig. S2b). As the reaction temperature declined, the
catalyst gradually precipitated from the reaction system and sank to the
bottom or adhered to inner wall of the flask again (Fig. S2c).
electivity with respect to the catalyst [PEG-1000-C12MIM][Ru-BINAP-
DPENDS] (entries 4 vs 5, Table 1) under the same reaction conditions,
although the catalyst indeed exhibited temperature-regulated separa-
tion behavior. The moiety of achiral diphosphine (DPPP) ligand ac-
counts for low enantioselectivity, although chiral ligand (S,S)-DPENDS
still could exert an impact on asymmetric induction in Ru(II) complex
catalyst [25]. Thus, the diphosphine ligand (S)-BINAP played a vital
role in not only offering chirality but also enhancing enantioselectivity
in present IL catalytic systems.
The conductivity has been proved a powerful tool to determine the
critical associating concentration (cac) of polymer surfactants [20],
which was highly related with the aggregation state of the surfactants.
The aggregation of the IL catalyst [PEG-1000-C MIM][Ru-BINAP-
n
Base promoter is very crucial in asymmetric hydrogenation [26],
and then the effect of the base promoter on reaction has been examined
over [PEG-1000-C12MIM][Ru-BINAP-DPENDS] catalyst. As shown in
Table S1, the conversion and enantioselectivity of asymmetric hydro-
genation of acetophenone decreased as the basicity weakened
DPENDS] in isopropanol was investigated by conductivity measure-
ment. As shown in Fig. 2, the conductivity was measured as a function
of the concentration of the IL catalyst. It was found that the con-
ductivity of the IL catalyst in isopropanol was close to that of iso-
−
1
propanol at 0 °C (0.06 k/μS·cm ) (Fig. 2a), demonstrating that the IL
was hardly dissolved in isopropanol, which was consistent with visual
observation. However, the conductivity increased significantly with the
catalyst concentration at 30 °C, and then the increment slowed down as
the concentration became higher, indicating that the aggregation in-
deed occurred, and the cac of IL catalyst was found around 7.9 mM by
linear fitting (Fig. 2b). Moreover, as the temperature increased to 40 °C
(
(CH
3
)
3
COK > KOH > K
2
CO ) under the same conditions (entries 2, 4
3
and 5, Table S1). Next, the dosage of base promoter was also examined,
which indicated that once n(CH3)3COK:ncatalyst reached up to 40 (entries
1
–3, Table S1), the reaction could happen smoothly. Moreover, the
molar ratio of substrate to catalyst (nsubstrate: ncatalyst) also affected the
catalytic activity and enantioselectivity significantly. As shown in Table
S2, the conversion of acetophenone decreased distinctly with increasing
(
Fig. 2c), the conductivity increased monotonously with the con-
n
substrate: ncatalyst due to catalyst dilution. The present IL catalyst could
centration of IL, which reflected that the aggregation did not almost
happen and the IL catalyst possibly existed almost as a molecular form
afford a TON value as high as ca. 3024 within 4 h reaction time (entry 2,
Table S2).
(
loose ion pairs) in isopropanol [21]. Additionally, the conductivity was
With the optimal usages of base promoter and catalyst, the effects of
strongly dependent on temperature at the constant concentration (Fig.
S3). As the temperature decreased, the conductivity decreased as well,
and some of the catalysts were observed to precipitate from solution at
around 20 °C. Furthermore, the complete phase separation of catalyst
occurred and meantime the conductivity of solution was 0.06 k/
the reaction time, temperature and H gas pressure on the catalytic
2
performance were investigated accordingly. The conversion of the
acetophenone was improved to some extent with the increase of the
reaction time, but the enantioselectivity declined for a longer reaction
time (Fig. S4a), which could result from racemization reaction of the
chiral product R-1-phenylethanol. Additionally, the reaction tempera-
ture had a significant effect. As shown in Fig. S4b, the conversion of
acetophenone increased obviously, but the e.e. value of the product
decreased slightly in the range of temperature from 20 °C to 40 °C.
However, as temperature was above 40 °C, all acetophenone was almost
converted to R-1-phenylethanol, but the e.e. value reduced to a certain
extent, indicating that the high e.e. value could not survive at high
−1
μS·cm
at 0 °C, which was close to the conductivity of isopropanol.
These properties were closely relevant to Upper Critical Solution
Temperature (UCST) behavior of the IL, which might be attributed to
hydrogen bonding or other possible interactions between IL and iso-
propanol. As the temperature decreased, the intermolecular interaction
between IL and solvent was weakened, while the intramolecular in-
teraction in ILs was strengthened, which led to a complete phase se-
paration [22].
temperature. Besides, it was observed that as the H pressure increased
2
from 0.1 MPa to 4.0 MPa (Fig. S4c), the conversion of acetophenone
increased from 35% to 99%, and e.e. value remained high above 92%,
which revealed that the present IL catalyst can afford high hydro-
genation activity, and meantime retained excellent enantioselectivity
2.3. Catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation
In this work, the as-synthesized different IL-coordinating ruthenium
complexes have been applied to the asymmetric hydrogenation, and
acetophenone was chosen as a model substrate (Table 1). It can be
found that the asymmetric hydrogenation hardly happened in the
under high H pressure.
2
The applicability of catalyst to various substrates is one of the es-
sential standards to evaluate new catalyst. The asymmetric
a
45