Li et al.
JOCArticle
and instructive in guiding the selection of appropriate bio-
catalysts for a specific transformation.6-9 Correlating the
substrate profile of an enzyme with its sequential and
structural information not only provides valuable insight
into the understanding of how enzymes control activity and
enantioselectivity but also facilitates our efforts to (semi)
rationally design novel enzymes with desired substrate spec-
ificity and enantioselectivity.10-13 Holding these in mind, we
have studied substrate specificity and enantioselectivity of
several carbonyl reductases from different origins that cat-
alyze reduction of ketones of diverse structures. To our
delight, these carbonyl reductases are capable of converting
aryl/alkyl ketones and R-/β-ketoesters to the corresponding
chiral alcohols with excellent enantiomeric purity.14-20 In
the course of our studies on a carbonyl reductase from
Sporobolomyces salmonicolor (SSCR), it has been found that
SSCR showed an unusually broad substrate range including
aliphatic, aromatic ketones, R- and β-ketoesters, and steri-
cally bulky aryl alkyl ketones and diaryl ketones.15,16,20 This
enzyme showed low enantioselectivity for the reduction of
para-substituted acetophenones (14-59% ee), although it
catalyzed the reduction of other ketones to the corre-
sponding chiral alcohols with excellent enantiomeric
purity.15,16 Recently, the X-ray structures of this carbonyl
reductase and its complex with a coenzyme, NADPH, have
been determined.21 A substrate-enzyme docking study of
p-methoxyacetophenone into the crystal structure of SSCR
was performed with ICM-Pro 3.4.9d22-24 in order to better
understand the enantioselective versatility in this ketone
reduction. During these simulations, two opposite orienta-
tions of p-methoxyacetophenone, which yield (S)-alcohol
isomer or the (R)-counterpart, respectively, have been found
to be energetically close to each other in the high-scoring
docking conformations. In both conformations, residues
SCHEME 1. Enzymatic Reduction of Para-Substituted Aceto-
phenones Catalyzed by SSCR Mutant Enzymes with a Cofactor
Regeneration System of D-Glucose Dehydrogenase and D-Glucose
M242 and Q245 are in close proximity to the para-substit-
uent of the acetophenones with hydrogen bonding or hydro-
phobic interactions.25,26 These simulation results are quali-
tatively consistent with the observed low enantio selectivity
in the SSCR-catalyzed reduction of para-substituted acet-
ophenones, and such close interaction was conjectured to
have played significant roles in determining the enzyme’s
enantioselectivity. Therefore, the residues M242 and Q245 in
the catalytic site were identified as the mutation targets to
improve the enzyme enantioselectivity. Single and double
saturation mutagenesis of residues M242 and Q245 were
performed, and the resulting mutant libraries were screened
for enhanced enantioselectivity toward the reduction of
para-substituted acetophenones. The preliminary results of
site-saturation mutagenesis of residue Q245 were previously
communicated,26 herein a detailed account of these studies
are presented.
Results and Discussion
Focused libraries of mutants were created by means of
site-saturation mutagenesis at residues M242 and Q245 in
the catalytic cavity of the carbonyl reductase from S. salmo-
nicolor. The resulting mutant libraries were screened with
p-methoxyacetophenone as substrate to select colonies
which showed close or higher activity than the wild-type
SSCR enzyme. The enantioselectivity of these selected co-
lonies was then measured by chiral gas chromatography. The
preliminary results obtained from the screening of the site-
saturation mutagenesis library at residue Q245 were pre-
viously reported in a communication26 and are not repeated
here. In screening the saturation mutagenesis library of
residue M242, four mutants were selected with higher
activity than others in the NADPH-adjuvant reduction of
p-methoxyacetophenone. Among these mutant enzymes,
M242Y, M242C, and M242G maintained the same stereo
preference (R) with the wild-type SSCR but they catalyzed
the reduction with lower enantioselectivity than the latter.
However, M242D produced (S)-1-(p-methoxyphenyl)ethanol
with ee values of 39%.
ꢀ €
(5) Martın-Matute, B.; Edin, M.; Bogar, K.; Kaynak, F. B.; Backvall,
´
J.-E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 8817.
(6) Burton, S. G.; Cowan, D. A.; Woodley, J. M. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002,
20, 37.
(7) Ema, T.; Yagasaki, H.; Okita, N.; Nishikawa, K.; Korenaga, T.;
Sakai, T. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16, 1075.
(8) Inoue, K.; Makino, Y.; Itoh, N. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2005, 16,
2539.
(9) Kaluzna, I. A.; Matsuda, T.; Sewell, A. K.; Stewart, J. D. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12827.
(10) Phillips, R. S. Can. J. Chem. 2002, 80, 680.
(11) Reetz, M. T.; Carballeira, J. D.; Peyralans, J.; Hobenreich, H.;
Maichele, A.; Vogel, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 6031.
(12) Paradisi, F.; Conway, P. A.; Maguire, A. R.; Engel, P. C. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3611.
(13) Babtie, A.; Tokuriki, N.; Hollfelder, F. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010,
14, 200.
(14) Zhu, D.; Yang, Y.; Hua, L. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4202.
(15) Zhu, D.; Yang, Y.; Buynak, J. D.; Hua, L. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006,
4, 2690.
(16) Zhu, D.; Hua, L. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 9484.
(17) Zhu, D.; Malik, H. T.; Hua, L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2006, 17,
3010.
(18) Yang, Y.; Zhu, D.; Piegat, T. J.; Hua, L. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2007, 18, 1799.
(19) Zhu, D.; Stearns, J. E.; Ramirez, M.; Hua, L. Tetrahedron 2006, 62,
4535.
(20) Li, H.; Zhu, D.; Hua, L.; Biehl, E. R. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351,
583.
(21) Kamitori, S.; Iguchi, A.; Ohtaki, A.; Yamada, M.; Kita, K. J. Mol.
Biol. 2005, 352, 551.
These mutant SSCR enzymes were further studied to
determine their enantioselectivity toward the reduction of
other para-substituted acetophenones (Scheme 1). The co-
factor NADPH was regenerated with D-glucose dehydro-
genase and D-glucose. The results are summarized in Table 1.
It can be seen that when compared to the wild-type SSCR,
(22) Schapira, M.; Abagyan, R.; Totrov, M. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46,
3045.
(23) Schapira, M.; Raaka, B. M.; Das, S.; Fan, L.; Totrov, M.; Zhou, Z.;
Wilson, S. R.; Abagyan, R.; Samuels, H. H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
2003, 100, 7354.
(25) Cundari, T. R.; Dinescu, A.; Zhu, D.; Hua, L. J. Mol. Model. 2007,
13, 685.
(26) Zhu, D.; Yang, Y.; Majkowicz, S.; Pan, T. H.-Y.; Kantardjieff, K.;
Hua, L. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 525.
(24) An, J.; Totrov, M.; Abagyan, R. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2005, 4, 752.
7560 J. Org. Chem. Vol. 75, No. 22, 2010