pubs.acs.org/joc
e.g., Pd-catalyzed Suzuki,1 Negishi,2 Kumada,3 Hiyama,4
Advantageous Use of tBu2P-NdP(iBuNCH2CH2)3N
in the Hiyama Coupling of Aryl Bromides and
Chlorides
and Stille5 reactions. Despite the toxicity and relatively
expensive organotin reagents, the Stille reaction remains a
popular approach, especially because of its utility in the
stereoselective coupling of vinyl- and alkenylstannanes.6
The potentially most attractive of the aforementioned
methodologies is Hiyama cross-coupling because organosi-
licon reagents are commercially available at relatively low
cost or can be easily prepared. These reagents are also
nontoxic and quite stable to the presence of other function-
alities and to a variety of reaction conditions. However,
because organosilanes are comparatively unreactive nucleo-
philes, Hiyama coupling has not yet replaced Stille and
Suzuki methodologies.1,4,5 For example, in contrast to Suzuki,
Kumada, and Stille methodologies, there is presently no
general method for cross-coupling considerably cheaper,
more widely available aryl chlorides with organosilicon com-
pounds.
Steven M. Raders, Jesudoss V. Kingston, and
John G. Verkade*
Department of Chemistry, Iowa State University,
Ames, Iowa 50011
Received November 1, 2009
Hiyama and co-workers showed that aryl(ethyl)dichloro-
silanes could be coupled with activated aryl chlorides to give
good yields of coupled product after 24-48 h at 120 °C in
DMF.4b Deshong and Mowery developed a useful protocol
for coupling aryl bromides and iodides with siloxane deriva-
tives, which have been touted as the most convenient organo-
silanes for Hiyama cross-coupling.4c However, challenges
with aryl chlorides were encountered in that work. Recently,
an efficient method for producing biaryls from mesityl-pro-
tected aryl alcohols and aryl siloxanes using 2 mol % of
Pd(OAc)2 and 8 mol % of CM-phos was reported.7 Ligands
such as PPh3, Bu3P, and Bu2P-biphenyl were completely
ineffective. Even Cy2P-biphenyl/Pd2dba3 (the most effective
catalyst utilized by Buchwald for a range of aryl chloride
cross-couplings4c) produced only a 47% yield of product in
the cross-couplingofPhSi(OMe)3 with4-chloroacetophenone
using 10 mol % of Pd2dba3.4c It has been reported that an
imidazoliumchloride/Pd(OAc)2 catalystwasmoreusefulthan
Cy2P-biphenyl/Pd2dba3 for three activated aryl chlorides, but
unactivated substrates such as 4-chloroanisole gave poor
yields.4f PdCl2(CH3CN)2 in the presence of β-diimine ligands
for the coupling of 4-chloroacetophenone with PhSi(OMe)3
afforded only a 62% yield of product.8
Recently, we reported the first synthesis of the bulky
phosphine 1 (Figure 1) and showed it to be effective in
Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reactions, giving high
yields of desired biaryls in the presence of 1 mol % of
Pd(OAc)2 and 2 mol % of 1.9 Ligand 1 features a bulky
iminoproazaphosphatrane moiety that provides electron
richnesstothetBu2P group via donation from the “equatorial”
iBuN substituents and via potential transannulation from the
basal planar N.9 Here we show the usefulness of 1 in the
Hiyama coupling of a variety of aryl bromides and chlorides
to obtain high yields of biaryls with low loadings of Pd
(0.25-1.0 mol %) and 1 (0.5-2.0 mol %).
An efficient catalytic route to biaryls by employing
(generally) only 0.25 mol % of Pd(OAc)2 and 0.5 mol %
of 1in the Hiyama coupling reaction is reported. High yields
for electron-rich, -neutral, and -deficient aryl chlorides are
obtained. A variety of phenylsiloxanes undergo coupling
with aryl bromides and chlorides with low Pd(OAc)2/1
loadings.
t
t
Palladium-catalyzed C-C bond-forming reactions are
exceedingly useful in modern organic synthesis. Biaryls
(constituents of aromatic polymers, liquid crystals, natural
products, and pharmaceuticals) can be synthesized using,
(1) (a) Miyaura, N.; Yamada, K.; Suzuki, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1979,
3437. (b) Stanforth, S. P. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 263. (c) Suzuki, A. Pure Appl.
Chem. 1991, 63, 419. (d) Wolfe, J. P.; Buchwald, S. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
1999, 38, 2413. (e) Zapf, A.; Beller, M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2000, 6, 1830.
(f) Bedford, R. B.; Cazin, C. S. J.; Coles, S. J.; Gelbrich, T.; Horton, P. N.;
Hursthouse, M. B.; Light, M. E. Organometallics 2003, 22, 987.
(2) (a) Baba, S.; Negishi, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 6729. (b) Dai, C.;
Fu, C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 2719.
(3) (a) Tamao, K.; Sumitani, K.; Kumada, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
4374. (b) Herrmann, W. A.; Bohm, V. P. W.; Reisinger, C. J. Organomet.
Chem. 1999, 576, 23.
(4) (a) Hatanaka, Y.; Hiyama, T. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 920. (b) Gouda,
K.; Hagiwara, E.; Hatanaka, Y.; Hiyama, T. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 7232.
(c) Mowery, M. E.; DeShong, P. Org. Lett. 1999, 1, 2137. (d) Lee, J.; Fu, G. C.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 5616. (e) Riggleman, S.; DeShong, P. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 8106. (f) Lee, H. M.; Nolan, S. P. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 2053.
(5) (a) Stille, J. K. Pure Appl. Chem. 1985, 57, 1771. (b) Stille, J. K. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 1986, 25, 508. (c) Farina, V.; Krishnamurthy, V.; Scott, W.
J. Org. React. 1997, 50, 1. (d) Hassa, J.; Svignon, M.; Gozzi, C.; Schulz, E.;
Lemaire, M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 1359. (e) Littke, A. F.; Fu, G. C. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 4176.
(6) (a) Nakao, N.; Satoh, J.; Shirakawa, E.; Hiyama, T. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 2271. (b) von Zezschwitz, P.; Petry, F.; de Meijere, A.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2001, 7, 4035. (c) Paley, R. S.; de Dios, A.; Estroff, L. A.;
Lafontaine, J. A.; Montero, C.; McCulley, D. J.; Rubio, M. B.; Ventura, M.
P.; Weers, H. L.; Fernandez de la Pradilla, R.; Castro, S.; Dorado, R.;
Morente, M. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 6326. (d) Chu, K. H.; Wang, K. K.
J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 767.
(7) So, C. M.; Lee, H. W.; Lau, C. P.; Kwong, F. Y. Org. Lett. 2009, 11,
317.
€
(8) Domin, D.; Benito-Garagorri, D.; Mereiter, K.; Frohlich, J.; Kirchner,
K. Organometallics 2005, 24, 3957.
(9) Kingston, J. V.; Verkade, J. G. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2816.
1744 J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 1744–1747
Published on Web 02/02/2010
DOI: 10.1021/jo902338w
r
2010 American Chemical Society