9
2% yield (entry 2). To clarify the role of the EG12 chains
of 3, some control experiments were carried out with several
ligand systems. With PPh (a core part of 3), no conversion
Table 2. Reaction of Various Substrates under the Optimum
3
a
Reaction Conditions
of 4-chlorotoluene was observed (entry 3). The ligand system
consisting of a mixture of EG12-dimethyl ether (MeO-
(
CH
the product at all (entry 4). Furthermore, neither a combination
of 7 and PPh (entry 5) nor a mixture of 4 (the oxide of 3) and
PPh (entry 6) afforded the product at all. These results clearly
2 2 3
CH O)12Me, 5-Me) and PPh in place of 3 did not afford
3
3
indicate that EG12 moieties must be connected to the phosphine
core in order to cause the high efficiency as the ligand. On the
other hand, the efficiency of 3 was affected considerably by
the reaction conditions such as solvent and base. When entry 2
in Table 1 was carried out in toluene, DMF, DME, 2-propanol,
or H
tions, the yield of 4-phenyltoluene decreased to 28%, 46%, 49%,
4%, or 39%, respectively. As for a base, KF, K PO , Na CO
Cs CO , or Li CO in place of K CO in entry 4 afforded the
2
O as a solvent under otherwise identical reaction condi-
6
3
4
2
3
,
2
3
2
3
2
3
product in 83%, 90%, 49%, 45%, or 4%, respectively. Thus, 3
works as an efficient ligand in THF with the potassium bases.
These observations are very reminiscent of a catalyst system
4
using 2 as the ligand.
The effectiveness of 3 as the ligand was further confirmed
using various aryl chlorides and arylboronic acids under the
optimum reaction conditions in THF with K CO (Table 2).
2 3
The electron-rich and -poor aryl chlorides were smoothly
converted to the corresponding biphenyl compounds in high
yields (entries 1 and 2). In the more sterically demanding
coupling reaction of 2-chloro-1,3-dimethylbenzene with phe-
nylboronic acid or 2-methylphenylboronic acid, the products
were obtained in high or moderate yields (entries 3 and 4).
a
2 2
Aryl chloride (2.0 mmol), arylboronic acid (4.0 mmol), [PdCl (PhCN) ]
1
-Phenylnaphthalene was obtained either from 1-chloronaph-
thalene or chlorobenzene in high yields (entries 5 and 6).
-Fluorophenylboronic acid afforded the product in 97% yield
entry 7). From 2-chloro-thiophene and phenylboronic acid, the
desired product was obtained in 93% yield (entry 8), while
-chloropyridine was converted to the corresponding compound
(0.010 mmol, 0.50 mol %), 3 (0.020 mmol), K CO (4.0 mmol), and THF
2 3
b
(
1.0 mL) at 60 °C for 20 h. Yields of the isolated products. The data in
the parentheses show yields of the products based on the GC internal
standard technique.
4
(
2
products decreased to 47% and 50%, respectively, showing
efficacy of longer EG12 chains of 3.
in low yield, possibly as a result of the coordination of the
pyridine moiety to a catalyst center (entry 9). When 1 instead
of 3 was used as the ligand in entries 1 and 6, the yields of the
Figure 2 shows an optimized structure of 3 calculated by
10
the ONIOM (B3LYP/LANL2DZ-UFF) method, in which
(
7) For recent papers on PEG-functionalized ligands in water, see: (a)
Hong, S. H.; Grubbs, R. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3508–3509. (b)
Gallivan, J. P.; Jordan, J. P.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46,
2
577–2580. (c) Adidou, O.; Goux-Henry, C.; Safi, M.; Soufiaoui, M.;
Framery, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 7217–7219. (d) Leyva, A.; Garc ´ı a,
H.; Corma, A. Tetrahedron 2007, 63, 7097–7111. (e) Corma, A.; Garc ´ı a,
H.; Leyva, A. J. Catal. 2006, 240, 87–99. (f) Wang, X.; Yin, L.; Yang, T.;
Wang, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2007, 18, 108–114.
(
8) (a) Middel, O.; Verboom, W.; Reinhoudt, D. N. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2
002, 258, 7–2597. (b) Balagurusamy, V. S. K.; Ungar, G.; Percec, V.;
Johansson, G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1539–1555. (c) Percec, V.;
Ahn, C.-H.; Cho, W.-D.; Jamieson, A. M.; Kim, J.; Leman, T.; Schmidt,
M.; Gerle, M.; M o¨ ller, M.; Prokhorova, S. A.; Sheiko, S. S.; Cheng, S. Z. D.;
Zhang, A.; Ungar, G.; Yeardley, D. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120,
8
619–8631.
(
9) (a) Allen, D. W.; Taylor, B. F. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1982,
5
3
1–54. (b) Socol, S. M.; Verkade, J. G. Inorg. Chem. 1984, 23, 3487–
493. (c) Andersen, N. G.; Keay, B. A. Chem. ReV. 2001, 101, 997–1030.
(
4
d) Alyea, E. C.; Malito, J. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 1989,
6, 175–181.
Figure 2. Optimized structure of 3 by ONIOM (B3LYP/LANL2DZ:
UFF) method. The space-filling diagram shows the triphenylphos-
phine core.
(
10) (a) Maseras, F.; Morokuma, K. J. Comput. Chem. 1995, 16, 1170–
1
1
179. (b) Humbel, S.; Sieber, S.; Morokuma, K. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105,
959–1967. (c) Svensson, M.; Humbel, S.; Froese, R. D. J.; Matsubara, T.;
Sieber, S.; Morokuma, K. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 19357–19363.
Org. Lett., Vol. 11, No. 10, 2009
2123