Table 1 Kinetic resolution of 1-phenylpropanol (1a) and 1-phenyl-
heptanol (1b)a
Formation of ketone has previously been observed dur-
ing racemization by catalyst 4 for bicyclic diols at elevated
temperatures.14 This ketone formation is believed to be a result
of substitution of the intermediate substrate ketone on the metal
center by acetone, a byproduct from the acyl donor. Cross-
over experiments have shown that this kind of ketone–ketone
exchange takes place to some extent if the racemization is left
after completion at elevated temperatures.15
In an attempt to reduce the ketone-formation by reducing the
amounts of by-product acetone present in the solution from the
Entry Substrate T/◦C Time/h eep (%)b ees (%)b Conv.(%)c
E
◦
˚
1d
2
3
4
5
1a
1b
1b
1b
1b
60
60
40
30
r.t.
24
6
24
72
72
96.4
98.4
98.0
97.7
98.0
44.2
36.0
31.5
42.6
14.8
32
33
23
29
13
85 ( 10)
acyl donor, a DKR was run at 60 C in the presence of 4 A
molecular sieves. This reduced the amount of ketone to 7% (Table
2, entry 5). These conditions were then also employed to the DKR
of 1-phenylpentanol (1c), which gave the product 2c in 88% yield
and 90% ee (Table 2, entry 6).
177 ( 25)
134 ( 15)
127 ( 15)
114 ( 15)
a Conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), isopropenyl acetate (1.5 equiv.), CalB W104A
(20 mg), toluene (1.0 mL) b Determined by chiral GC. c Determined by 1H
NMR. d 1 (0.25 mmol), CalB W104A (5 mg), toluene (0.5 mL).
To conclude, an efficient (S)-selective DKR of 1-phenylalkanols
has been developed. 1-Phenylpropanol was efficiently acylated at
60 ◦C to give the product in 96.5% enantiomeric excess. DKR
of 1-phenylheptanol required lower temperatures (and longer
reaction times) or addition of molecular sieves to suppress ketone
formation. The product was obtained in 97% ee in high yield. This
is the first (S)- selective DKR of a sec-alcohol performed with an
enzyme that can be used at elevated temperatures.
Table 2 (S)-Selective dynamic kinetic resolution of secondary alcoholsa
Acknowledgements
Financial support from the Swedish Research Council, the
Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research and the K&A Wal-
lenberg Foundation is gratefully acknowledged.
Entry Substrate
T/◦C Time/h eep (%)b
Conv. (%)c % 3c
Notes and references
1 G. Carrea, S. Riva, Organic synthesis with enzymes in non-aqueous
media, Wiley-Vch Verlag GmbH & Co., 2008, Weinheim.
2 T. Ema, Curr. Org. Chem., 2004, 8, 1009–1025.
3 When the medium-sized group has a lower priority than the large
group, the compound will have (R)-stereochemistry according to the
Cahn–Ingold–Prelog rules: R. J. Kazlauskas, A. N. E. Weissfloch,
A. T. Rappaport and L. A. Cuccia, J. Org. Chem., 1991, 56, 2656–
2665.
4 E. M. Anderson, K. M. Larsson and O. Kirk, Biocatal. Biotransform.,
1998, 16, 181–204.
5 J. Uppenberg, N. Ohmer, M. Norin, K. Hult, G. J. Kleywegt, S. Patkar,
V. Waagen, T. Anthomen and T. A. Jones, Biochemistry, 1995, 34,
16838–16851.
1
2
3
1a
1b
1b
1b
1b
1c
60
60
40
30
60
60
36
26
88
6 days
24
96.5
94
95
97
96.5
90
99 (85)d
93
10
38
24
1
7
8
97
4e
5e,f
6e,f
99 (84)d
97(84)d
99 (88)d
24
a Conditions: 1 (0.5 mmol), isopropenyl acetate (1.5 equiv.), Na2CO3 (1
equiv.), Ru-catalyst 4 (0.05 equiv.), tBuOK (0.05 equiv.), CalB W104A (20
mg), toluene (1.0 mL). b Determined by chiral GC. c Determined by 1H
NMR. d Isolated yields in parenthesis. e CalB W104A (30 mg). f 350 mg
˚
molecular sieves (4 A) added.
6 D. Rotticci, F. Haeffner, C. Orrenius, T. Norin and K. Hult, J. Mol.
Catal. B: Enzym., 1998, 5, 267.
7 A. O. Magnusson, M. Takwa, A. Hamberg and K. Hult, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 4582–4585.
8 A. O. Magnusson, J. C. Rotticci-Mulder, A. Santagostino and K. Hult,
ChemBioChem, 2005, 6, 1051–1056.
9 M. Vallin, P.-O. Syre´n and K. Hult, ChemBioChem, 2010, 11, 411–416.
10 M.-J. Kim, Y. Chung, Y. Choi, H. Lee, D. Kim and J. Park, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11494–11495.
after 36 h full conversion was reached (Table 2, entry 1). The
product ester (2a) had an enantiomeric excess of 96.5%, and also
contained 10% of the corresponding ketone 3a.
DKR of 1-phenylheptanol (1b) was also performed at 60 ◦C.
However, this DKR yielded as much as 38% of the corresponding
ketone, 1-phenylheptanone (3b) (Table 2, entry 2). To avoid ketone
formation in the DKR of 1-phenylheptanol (1b), the temperature
was decreased. At 40 ◦C, the amount of ketone was reduced to
24%, and at 30 ◦C, only 1% was formed (Table 2, entries 3–
4) However, longer reaction times were required to reach full
conversion at decreased temperatures. At 30 ◦C, 6 days was
required to reach full conversion (99%). Under these conditions,
(S)-2b was obtained in 97% ee.
11 L. Bore´n, B. Mart´ın-Matute, Y. Xu, A. Co´rdova and J.-E. Ba¨ckvall,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 225–232.
12 The E value was previously reported as 28 at 56 ◦C in cyclohexane9.
13 The E value in cyclohexane at 60 ◦C under the same conditions was
determined to 76.
14 P. Krumlinde, K. Boga´r and J.-E. Ba¨ckvall, Chem. Eur. J., 2010, 16,
4031–4036.
15 B. Mart´ın-Matute, M. Edin, K. Bogar, F. B. Kaynak and J.-E. Ba¨ckvall,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 8817–8825.
82 | Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 81–82
This journal is
The Royal Society of Chemistry 2011
©