A. Shih-Yuan Lee et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 301–303
CO H
CO Et
303
2
2
87%
CBr / EtOH (5%/5mL),
4
+
+
hv (30 min); stir 40h at r.t.
CO H
CO2H 91%
2
Scheme 4.
We further investigated this highly chemoselective ester-
ification process between phenylacetic and phenylpropi-
olic acids (Scheme 4). The sp -C tethered primary
carboxylic acid was converted into its ethyl ester in 87%
yield, whereas the sp-C tethered carboxylic acid was
resistant under the reaction conditions for 40 hours and
a 91% recovery was obtained after chromatography.
2. Kocienski, P. J. Protecting Group; Georg Thieme Verlag:
New York, 1994.
3
3. Ogliaruso, M. A.; Wolfe, J. F. In Synthesis of Carboxylic
Acids, Esters and Their Derivatives; Patai, S.; Rappoport,
Z., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1991.
4. Ladduwahettu, T. Contemp. Org. Synth. 1997, 4, 326.
5. Haslam, E. Tetrahedron 1980, 36, 2409.
6
. Sutherland, I. O. In Comprehensive Organic Chemistry;
Barton, D. H. R.; Ollis, W. D., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford,
1979; Vol. 6, p. 871.
In conclusion: these reaction conditions provide a
highly chemoselective method for the esterification of a
carboxylic acid. This method enables the esterification
7. Rodriguez, A.; Nomen, M.; Spur, B. W.; Godfroid, J. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 8563.
8. Ram, R. N.; Charles, I. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 7335.
9. Saitoh, M.; Fujisaki, S.; Ishii, Y.; Nishiguchi, T. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1996, 37, 6733.
3
2
of an sp -C tethered carboxylic acid, whereas sp -C and
sp-C tethered carboxylic acids were stable under the
reaction conditions. Our previous investigations have
shown that numerous functionalities are hydrolyzed by
this reaction system (e.g. acetals/ketals, silyl ethers,
tetrahydropyranyl ethers, etc.). These results lead us to
investigate the mechanism of this highly chemoselective
method and studies are underway.
10. Albert, R.; Danklmaier, J.; Honig, H.; Kandolf, H. Syn-
thesis 1987, 635.
11. Ogawa, T.; Hikasa, T.; Ikegami, T.; Ono, N.; Suzuki, H.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1994, 23, 3473.
12. Banerjee, A.; Adak, M. M.; Das, S.; Banerjee, S.; Sen-
gupta, S. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 1987, 64, 34.
Acknowledgements
13. Blossey, E. C.; Turner, L. M.; Neekers, D. C. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1973, 15, 1823.
14. Chakraborti, A. K.; Basak, A.; Grover, V. J. Org. Chem.
We thank the National Science Council in Taiwan
1999, 64, 8014.
(
NSC 89-2113-M-032-004) and Tamkang University for
15. Lee, A. S.-Y.; Yeh, H.-C.; Shie, J.-J. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 5249.
financial support.
1
6. Lee, A. S.-Y.; Yeh, H.-C.; Tsai, M.-H. Tetrahedron Lett.
995, 36, 6891.
17. Lee, A. S.-Y.; Cheng, C.-L. Tetrahedron 1997, 42, 14255.
1
References
1
8. Lee, A. S.-Y.; Su, F.-Y.; Liao, Y.-C. Tetrahedron Lett.
1
. Greene, T. W.; Wuts, P. G. M. Protective Groups in
Organic Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York,
991.
1999, 40, 1323.
19. The results for selective desilylation of silyl esters will be
submitted for publication soon.
1
CBr / MeOH (5%/5mL)
4
RCH -CO SitBuMe
RCH -CO Me
2 2
2
2
2
hv (30 min); stir at rt, 2-3.5h
CBr / MeOH (5%/5mL)
4
R CH-CO SitBuMe
R CH-CO H
2 2
2
2
2
hv (30 min); stir at rt, 2.5-5h
.