256
Herpel and Rehse
Table 2. NO formation (chemiluminescence) and N2O formation (gas chromatography) from 1, 2, and SIN 1 as a function of the solvent (37 °C) and its pH
after 1 h. The values are in % ± S; n.d. = not detected; n = 5.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
Cpd.
Detected
species
Mere
compound
Phosphate
buffer pH 7.4
Ethanol
Phosphate
buffer/ethanol 1: 1
Ethanol/HCl
0.1 N 1:1
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
1
NO
n.d.
3.15 ±0.15
1.9 ±0.17
6.8 ±0.30
4.0 ± 0.27
N2O
0.05±0.003
0.05 ±0.005
0.05±0.003
0.04 ±0.001
0.05 ±0.003
2
NO
n.d.
n.d.
1.3 ±0.02
1.1 ±0.08
1.1 ±0.08
0.05 ±0.004
0.03 ±0.002
N2O
0.08 ±0.006
n.d.
0.06 ±0.003
SIN 1
NO
n.d.
2.73 ±0.20
0.16±0.006
0.89 ±0.05
0.11 ±0.006
N2O
0.01±0.0007
0.03 ±0.003
n.d.
0.008±0.0006
n.d.
—————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————–
The pattern of pharmacological activities of NO donors also true for the other reaction conditions. To compare the
comprises a more or less pronounced decrease in blood compounds in the dissolved state a mixture of phosphate
pressure. We therefore assayed compounds 1 and 2 in spon- buffer and ethanol (1:1) was used. Hereby the generation of
•
taneously hypertensive rats (SHR). Briefly the conscious rat NO is enhanced in 1, remains constant in 2 and is decreased
in SIN 1. An acidic medium, i.e. ethanol/0.1N HCl (1:1), was
applied to approach the conditions in the stomach which
might be important for the passage after oral administration.
Here only 1 shows NO formation at a rate of 4%. This
decomposition of 1, however, will not much influence its
bioavailability. The results in summary show that from all
compounds NO can be liberated at 37 °C at a similar rate so
that 1 and 2 can be classified as NO donors.
is warmed up (10 ± 5 min) in a perspex tube to 37 °C. The rat
tail which is out of the tube is surrounded by a pressure cuff
and more distally by a piezo pulse wave transducer.
The measurement begins when the correct opening of the
tail arteries is indicated by a light signal for constant pulse.
The pressure in the cuff is raised until the pulsations cease.
Then the pressure is decreased continuously until the pulse
returns. The arterial blood pressure can be determined di-
rectly from the chart of the recorder. The results of the above
experiments are summarized in Table 1.
Both compounds quite obviously inhibit thrombus forma-
tion. The antithrombotic effect of 1 is slightly stronger than
that of 2. Surprisingly with 1 the inhibition in arterioles and
venules is equal. Normally it is more difficult to inhibit
thrombus formation in venules because the flow velocity is
slower and thrombus formation easier.
Experimental Part
1,3,5-Trinitroso-hexahydro-1,3,5-triazine[1] (1)
1,3,5,7-Tetrazatricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decane (hexamethylenetetramine)
(2.0 g, 14.3 mmol) was dissolved in water (80 ml), cooled with ice, and cold
dilute (10%) hydrochloric acid (30 ml) added. The solution is mixed imme-
diately with sodium nitrite (5.0 g, 70 mmol) dissolved in a little water. After
a few min, yellow crystals form at the surface. They are filtered off under
suction and recrystallized from ethanol. Yellow crystals, mp 100 °C
(ref.[1]105 °C), yield 20%.– Anal. C3H6N6O3.
The lowering of the blood pressure by 1 is marginal while
[13]
2 lacks any antihypertensive effect. This again
shows that
it is possible in NO donors to separate the antithrombotic
properties from hypotonous effects. The reason might be that
endothelial and/or smooth muscle cells are not able to trans-
form 2 to nitric oxide while the metabolic potential of liver
cells is sufficient for this process so that blood platelets can
still be influenced.
3,7-Dinitroso-1,3,5,7-tetrazabicyclo[3.3.1]nonane[2] (2)
A concentrated solution of 1,3,5,7-tetrazatricyclo[3.3.1.13,7]decane
(15.0 g, 110 mmol) and sodium nitrite (7.6 g) is prepared and cooled with
ice. Dilute nitric acid is then added until a permanent smell of nitrous acid is
noted. After a few min crystals precipitate. After several additional min they
are filtered off under suction, washed with water, and recrystallized from
ethanol. Crystals, mp 202 °C (ref.[2] 207 °C), yield 8.5%.– Anal.
C5H10N6O2.
•
–
In Vitro Formation of NO and NO from 1 and 2
The formation of nitric oxide was determined by a chemi-
[14]
luminescence method . The quantification of nitrosohy-
References
drogen was performed gas-chromatographically via its stable
[12]
[1] F. Mayer, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1888, 21, 2883–2890.
dimerisation product N O . The results are compiled in
2
Table 2.
[2] P. Griess, G. Harrow, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1888, 21, 2737–2739.
[3] H. Urban, E. Amlacher, M. Danz, Exp. Pathol. 1975, 10, 364–365.
[4] H. Urban, M. Danz, Arch. Geschwulstforsch. 1976, 46, 657–662.
The data of the standard NO donor SIN 1 were included for
comparison. The 3rd column of Table 2 shows that all three
compounds are stable in the solid state at 37 °C for at least
1 h. When dissolved (SIN 1) or suspended in phosphate buffer
[5] J.H. Weisburger, E.K. Weisburger, N. Mantel, Z. Hadidian, T. Fre-
•
drickson, Naturwissenschaften 1966, 53, 508.
(pH 7.4) the formation of NO is observed. This release is
nearly equal in SIN 1 and 1 (2.73 vs 3.15%) while 2 is more
[6] D. Boyland, R.L. Carter, J.W. Gorrod, F.J.C. Roe, Eur. J. Cancer, 1968,
4, 233–239.
stable (1.3%). The formation of N O is negligible which is
2
Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 332, 255–257 (1999)