280
H. Park, S. Jung / Carbohydrate Research 343 (2008) 274–281
spectra were obtained with a MALDI-TOF mass spec-
trometer (Voyager-DETM STR Bio-Spectrometry, Ap-
plied Biosystems, Framingham, MA, USA) in the
positive-ion mode using 2,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid
(DHB) as the matrix. Approximately 0.5 lL of the sam-
ple/matrix mixture was applied to the MALDI probe,
and the solvent was removed by evaporation.
lyzed by NMR spectroscopy or HPLC. The values of
kcat_Cys and kuncat were calculated by integration of the
1
respective H NMR signals, or HPLC peaks were as-
signed to the ethyl ester and methyl ester. To measure
the possible acyl intermediates, each ethyl ester of N-
acetyl amino acid (200 mM) was dissolved in 1 mL of
MeOH, and Cys (14 mg) was then added. At 3 h the
reaction mixture was completely evaporated at room
temperature and subjected to extraction after adding
1 mL of water and chloroform, respectively. The inter-
mediates dissolved in the water layer were then analyzed
by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
3.3. Preparation of cyclosophoraoses (Cys)
R. meliloti were cultured in a 5-L jar fermenter contain-
ing glutamic acid and mannitol salts (GMS) medium to
a late logarithmic phase at 30 ꢁC.28,29 Cells were har-
vested by centrifugation (8000 rpm at 4 ꢁC) and then ex-
tracted with 75% (v/v) ethanol at 70 ꢁC for 30 min. After
centrifugation, the supernatant was concentrated on a
vacuum rotary evaporator. The concentrated sample
was chromatographed on a Sephadex G-50 column
(3 · 130 cm) at a rate of 1 mL/min, and eluant fractions
(7 mL) were assayed for carbohydrates by the phenol–
sulfuric acid method. The fractions containing Cys were
pooled, concentrated, and desalted using a Sephadex G-
10 column (2 · 20 cm). The desalted sample was then
applied to a column (2 · 20 cm) of DEAE-cellulose to
separate neutral and anionic Cys. After the neutral
Cys was desalted using a Sephadex G-10 column
(2 · 20 cm), they were also confirmed on thin-layer chro-
matography (TLC, 5:5:4 BuOH–EtOH–water), NMR
spectroscopy, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
For further separation, each cyclosophoraose with dif-
ferent DP was fractionated by preparative HPLC (LC-
6AD, Shimadzu, Japan). The column used was a Bond-
clone C8 column (10 lM, 250 · 21.2 mm), and the eluant
was 96:4 water–MeOH with flow rate of 4 mL/min.
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by the National R&D pro-
ject for Biodiscovery in MOST 2004, SDG.
References
1. Abe, M.; Amemura, A.; Higashi, S. Plant Soil 1982, 64,
315–324.
2. Amemura, A. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1984, 48, 1809–1817.
3. Amemura, A.; Hisamatsu, M.; Mitani, H. Carbohydr. Res.
1983, 114, 277–285.
4. Breedveld, M. W.; Miller, K. J. Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 58,
145–161.
5. Miller, K. J.; Kennedy, E. P.; Reinhold, V. N. Science
1986, 231, 48–51.
´
6. Andre, L.; Mazeau, K.; Taravel, F. R.; Tvaroska, I. Int. J.
Macromol. 1995, 17, 189–198.
7. Spaink, H. P. Plant Mol. Biol. 1992, 6, 977–986.
8. Morris, V. J.; Brownsey, G. J.; Chilvers, G. R.; Harris, J.
E.; Gunning, A. P.; Stevens, B. H. J. Food Hydrocolloids
1991, 5, 185–188.
3.4. Preparation of linear (1!2)-b-D-glucan from
9. Kwon, C.; Choi, Y.; Kim, N.; Yoo, J.; Yang, C.; Kim, H.;
Jung, S. J. Inclusion Phenom. 2000, 36, 55–65.
10. Lee, S.; Kwon, C.; Choi, Y.; Seo, D.; Kim, H.; Jung, S. J.
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2001, 11, 463–468.
cyclosophoraoses (Cys)
Linear-(1!2)-b-D-glucan was prepared by acid hydroly-
sis (0.08 M trifluoroacetic acid, 100 ꢁC, 1 h) and subse-
quent fractionation by using a Sephadex G-10 column
(2 · 20 cm). The structural analysis of linear (1!2)-b-
D-glucan was investigated by NMR spectroscopy and
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
11. Lee, S.; Seo, D.; Kim, H.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Res. 2001,
334, 119–126.
12. Lee, S.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Res. 2002, 337, 1785–1789.
13. Lee, S.; Jung, S. . Carbohydr. Res. 2003, 338, 1143–1146.
14. Lee, S.; Jung, S. . Carbohydr. Res. 2004, 339, 461–468.
15. Mimura, M.; Kitamura, S.; Gotoh, S.; Takeo, K.;
Urakawa, H.; Kajiwara, K. Carbohydr. Res. 1996, 289,
25–37.
3.5. General procedure for the methanolysis of ethyl esters
16. Choi, Y.; Yanga, C.; Kim, H.; Jung, S. Carbohydr. Res.
2000, 326, 227–234.
17. Cech, T. R.; Zaug, A. J.; Grabowski, P. J. Cell 1981, 27,
487–496.
18. Breaker, R. R.; Joyce, G. F. Chem. Biol. 1994, 1, 223–229.
19. Ulrich, H. D.; Mundorff, E.; Santarsiero, B. D.; Driggers,
E. M.; Stevens, R. C.; Schultz, P. G. Nature 1997, 389,
271–275.
20. Rousseau, C.; Caballero, F. O.; Nordstrøm, L. U.;
Christensen, B.; Pedersen, T. E.; Bols, M. Chem. Eur. J.
2005, 11, 5094–5101.
21. Caballero, F. O.; Rousseau, C.; Christensen, B.; Pedersen,
T. E.; Bols, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3238–3239.
The reaction was carried out in MeOH (2 mL) contain-
ing 40 mM of each ethyl ester at 60 ꢁC in the absence or
presence of 0.1 equiv of carbohydrates such as Cys, glu-
cose, linear (1!2)-b-D-glucan, and amylose. To test the
effect of organic solvents (hexadecane, octane, carbon
tetrachloride, toluene, benzene, THF, acetonitrile, and
dioxane), 4 mM of Cys was placed in 2 mL of each or-
ganic solvent containing 40 mM of AYEE and 4 M of
MeOH. Aliquots were periodically withdrawn and ana-