COMMUNICATIONS
At the transition to the high-temperature mesophase SmA
either the long-range parallel alignment of the rigid cores
within the PR layers or the orientational correlation between
adjacent layers may be lost. It is, however, most likely that the
two processes occur simultaneously. This means that the
formation of a long-range orientational order within the
individual layers at the transition from the uniaxial SmA to
the biaxial SmAb phase is accompanied by the formation of a
long-range orientational correlation between adjacent layers.
Hence, the phase structure of this SmA phase is related to
those of conventional SmA phases, with the difference that in
this new phase the biphenyl cores should be aligned on
average parallel to the layer planes (see Figure 2c).[18]
of the classical 3D mesophases. Hence, it could be expected
that a diversity of different higher-order structures related to
those known from conventional smectic phases could also be
obtained within the layers of these laminated mesophases.
Additional new mesophases could be expected at the
transition between the columnar phases of compounds 1 and
the smectic phases of 2 4, and as a result of the positional
correlation between adjacent layers of the laminated smectic
phases, and this would lead to numerous novel mesophases
with two- and three-dimensional organization.[24]
Received: June 24, 2002 [Z19590]
The transition from the SmAb phase to the low-temperature
phase is characterized by a reduction in the fluidity, as
indicated by the transition from a schlieren texture to a
paramorphotic mosaiclike texture. This means that additional
order should occur at this phase transition. In analogy to the
phase sequence Iso-N-SmA, which is often observed in
conventional LC systems on decreasing the temperature, it
can be assumed that in the low-temperature mesophase of 3
the bolaamphiphilic cores adopt a positional order within the
PR sublayers. This results from the segregation of the
hydrogen-bonding networks from the aromatic cores which
leads to a smecticlike organization within these sublayers (see
Figure 2i). Hence, microsegregation occurs in two distinct
directions: Segregation of the nonpolar chains from the PR
cores leads to the ™bulk∫ layer structure, and segregation of
polar and aromatic subunits within the PR layers gives rise to
an additional periodicity within these sublayers which occurs
parallel to the layer planes. As the wide-angle scattering
remains diffuse in all three mesophases, no additional order
between the aromatic cores (e.g., SmB-like) or within the
sublayers of the lateral chains should occur in this low-
temperature mesophase. In other words, this mesophase can
be regarded as a fluid smectic phase which is laminated
parallel to the molecular long axes by the fluid layers of the
lateral chains. Because we have no particular indication for a
tilted arrangement of the molecules within these quasi-2D
smectic sublayers[19] the simplest possibility for a laminated
SmA structure (LamA)[20] is suggested for this mesophase
(Figure 2i). Surprisingly, however, the additional repeat
distance within the PR sublayers, which is expected to occur
perpendicular to the layer reflection at the equator of the two-
dimensional X-ray pattern, cannot be found in the X-ray
diffraction pattern. This could be explained by assuming that
the electron-density modulation within the 2D smectic sub-
layers is low;[21] hence, the intensity of the corresponding
reflections is very low. Additionally, there is no positional
correlation between adjacent layers, and this means that there
is only an orientational correlation of adjacent layers, but the
individual layers can still slide with respect to each other. This
phase structure has some similarities to the sliding colum-
nar[22] and lamellar columnar mesophases.[23]
[1] J.-M. Lehn, Supramolecular Chemistry, VCH, Weinheim, 1995.
[2] D. Demus, J. Goodby, G. W. Gray, H. W. Spiess, V. Vill, Handbook of
Liquid Crystals, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1998.
[3] J. A. Schrˆter, C. Tschierske, M. Wittenberg, J. H. Wendorff, J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10669.
[4] M. Kˆlbel, T. Beyersdorff, X. H. Cheng, C. Tschierske, J. Kain, S.
Diele, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 6809.
[5] C. Tschierske, Prog. Polym. Sci. 1996, 21, 775.
[6] Selected examples of LC materials with fluorinated chains: a) F.
Guittard, E. Taffin de Givenchy, S. Geribaldi, A. Cambon, J. Fluorine
Chem. 1999, 100, 85; b) H. T. Nguyen, G. Sigaud, M. F. Achard, F.
Hardouin, R. J. Twieg, K. Betterton, Liq. Cryst. 1991, 10, 389; c) T.
Doi, Y. Sakurai, A. Tamatani, S. Takenaka, S. Kusabashi, Y. Nishihata,
H. Terauchi, J. Mater. Chem. 1991, 1, 169; d) S. V. Arehart, C. Pugh, J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3027; e) S. Pensec, F.-G. Tournilhac, P.
Bassoul, C. Durliat, J. Phys. Chem. 1998, 102, 52; f) S. Diele, D. Lose,
H. Kruth, G. Pelzl, F. Guittard, A. Cambon, Liq. Cryst. 1996, 21, 603;
g) U. Dahn, C. Erdelen, H. Ringsdorf, R. Festag, J. H. Wendorff, P. A.
Heiney, N. C. Maliszewskyj, Liq. Cryst. 1995, 19, 759; h) V. Percec, G.
Johansson, G. Ungar, J. Zhou, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 9855; i) A.
Pegenau, X.-H. Cheng, C. Tschierske, P. Gˆring, S. Diele, New. J.
Chem. 1999, 23, 465; k) M.-A. Guillevic, D.-W. Bruce, Liq. Cryst. 2000,
27, 153.
[7] a) X. H. Cheng, C. Tschierske, P. Gˆring, S. Diele, Angew. Chem.
2000, 112, 605; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 592; b) X. H. Cheng,
M. K. Das, S. Diele, C. Tschierske, Langmuir 2002, 18, 6521.
[8] C. Tschierske, J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 11, 2647.
[9] Q.-Y Chen, Z. Y. Yang, C.-X. Zhao, Z. M. Qiu, J. Chem. Soc. Perkin
Trans. 1 1988, 563.
[10] G. Majetch, R. Hicks, S. Reister, J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 4321.
[11] V. Van Rheenen, D. Y. Cha, W. M. Hartley, Org. Synth. 1979, 58, 43.
[12] a) N. Miyaura, T. Yanagi, A. Suzuki, Synth. Commun. 1981, 11, 513;
b) M. Hird, G. W. Gray, K. J. Toyne, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 1991, 206,
187.
[13] All analytical data are in accordance with the proposed structures; for
1
example, 3: H NMR (400 MHz; [D6]DMSO): d ¼ 9.36 (s, 1H, OH),
7.33 (d, 3J(H,H) ¼ 8.6 Hz, 2H, ArH), 7.28 (m, 2H, ArH), 6.91 (d,
3J(H,H) ¼ 8.4 Hz, 1H, ArH), 6.77 (d, 3J(H,H) ¼ 8.6 Hz, 2H, ArH),
4.84 (brs, 1H, CHOH), 4.58 (m, 1H, CH2OH), 3.76 3.49 (m, 3H,
3
ArCH2OCH)), 3.46 (m, 2H, CH2OH), 2.60 (t, 2H, J(H,H) ¼ 7.2 Hz,
CH2Ar), 2.08 (2H, CH2CF2), 1.75 (m, 2H, CH2); 13C NMR (100 MHz;
[D6]DMSO): d ¼ 156.6, 155.6, 132.7, 131.1 129.4, 127.4, 127.3, 125.1,
115.6, 112.1, 70.0, 69.5, 62.7, 29.8, 20.1; 19F NMR (188 MHz;
[D6]DMSO): d ¼ À82.46 (3F, CF3), À114.40 (2F, CH2CF2), À122.74
(m, 12F, CF2), À123.91 (2F, CF2CF2CF3), À127.32 (2F, CF2CF3);
elemental analysis (%) calcd for C28H21O4Si21: C 40.99, H 2.58; found:
C 40.83, H 2.99.
[14] H. R. Brand, P. E. Cladis, H. Pleiner, Macromolecules 1992, 25, 7223.
[15] T. Hegmann, J. Kain, G. Pelzl, S. Diele, C. Tschierske, Angew. Chem.
2001, 113, 911; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 887.
[16] The texture of the LamA phase of compound 2 which occurs directly
from the isotropic liquid state is not a paramorphotic texture and
therefore typical mosaic and spherulitic textures can be observed.
[17] The alignment is obtained by spreading the samples on a glass
substrate, without applying external electric or magnetic fields.
These results show that the competitive combination of
microsegregation and rigidity is an appropriate way to obtain
exciting new mesophase morphologies that are quite distinct
from conventional mesophases. The individual sheets of these
lamellar arrangements can be regarded as quasi-2D analogues
4034
¹ 2002 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
0044-8249/02/4121-4034 $ 20.00+.50/0
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, No. 21