6
22
(
(
L)Pt
L)Pt
Pt(L)
X
X
(dppf)Pt
(dppf)Pt
Br
Br
(
L)Pt
X
X
m
m
m
m
m
m
-
4"Pt"
(d)
(e)
2
CPPs
C-C bond
formation
Reductive
elimination
n
n
n
n
n
(
L)Pt
Pt(L)
3
: X = Br or I
4: X = SnMe3
: X = Pt(cod)Cl
: X = Pt(dppf)Cl
a: n = 1, b: n = 2, c : n = 3
(a)
b)
c)
1
a (45% from 6a)
b (71% from 6b)
1c (74% from 6c)
1
2
(
1
5
6
(
Scheme 2. The proposed new synthetic route to CPPs via
platinum squares.
(
(
dppf)Pt
Pt(dppf)
synthesis of [6]CPP as reported by Jasti requires long reaction
steps in a low overall yield (0.7% over 8 steps).15 So far, our
own investigations on the synthesis of CPPs smaller than [8]CPP
have been unsuccessful. Therefore, a new and high-yielding
synthetic route for small CPPs is highly anticipated.
We envisioned that para-haloaryl-substituted dinuclear
platinum complex 1 could serve as a precursor for tetranuclear
platinum complex 2 through double carboncarbon bond
formation mediated by the carbonhalogen functionality
[8]CPP (74% from 2b)
[10]CPP (75% from 2c)
(
f)
n
n
dppf)Pt
Pt(dppf)
2
a (63% from 1a)
b (31% from 1b)
Br
Br
m
2
7
8
: m = 1 (33%)
: m = 3 (31%)
2c (20% from 1c)
Scheme 3. Synthesis of [8]- and [10]CPPs. Reagents and
conditions: a) 1) BuLi (2.0 equiv), THF, ¹78 °C, 1 h or Mg
(2.5 equiv), THF, reflux, overnight; 2) Me SnCl (2.53.0 equiv),
(Scheme 2). Reductive elimination by platinum in 2 should
3
then give the CPP. We here report the selective synthesis of
room temperature (rt), 36 h, 7594%; b) [Pt(cod)Cl ] (2.0
2
[
6]CPP by this route, in which a Ni(0)-mediated Yamamoto
equiv), THF or THF/toluene, 60 °C, 812 h, 8794%; c) dppf
(2.0 equiv), CH2Cl2, rt, 68 h, 8792%; d) LiC6H4Br (3.0
3
5,36
coupling
was utilized as the key step for the synthesis of 2.
5
.0 equiv), THF, ¹78 °C to rt, 12 h, 4574%; e) [Ni(cod)2]
We further report an improved reductive elimination of 2 to
yield [6]CPP, as previously reported conditions did not give the
desired compound, probably because of the high ring strain. To
clarify the scope of this new route, we also report the selective
synthesis of [8]- and [10]CPPs.
(
2.0 equiv), dppf (2.0 equiv), THF, 50 °C, 1218 h, 2063%; f)
Br2 (4.0 equiv), toluene, 90 °C, 12 h.
P Br
Pt
P
Br
To address our hypothesis, 1 was first synthesized from
the commercially available dibromo (or diiodo) biaryls 3a3c
(Scheme 3). The halogens in 3a3c were transmetallated to a
trimethylstannyl group by treatment with BuLi or Mg (2.5 equiv)
9
in THF at ¹78 °C, followed by reaction with Me SnCl
3
(
3.0 equiv), giving 4a4c in 7594% yield. Compound 4 was
Figure 2. Structure of proposed intermediate 9, as formed by
treatment of complex 2 with Br2. DPPF ligand is abbreviated to
PP.
then reacted with 2 equiv of [Pt(cod)Cl2] (cod: 1,5-cycloocta-
diene) giving bisplatinum complexes 5a5c in 8794% yield,
which were subsequently treated with 1,1¤-bis(diphenylphos-
phino)ferrocene (dppf) to give 6a6c in 8792% yield. Treat-
ment of 6a6c with in situ generated 4-bromophenyllithium
afforded 1a1c in 4574% yield. The structure of 1 was
Table 1. Reaction optimization for the synthesis of [6]CPP via
reductive elimination of 2a
Entry
Additive (equiv)
Product (%)a
1
31
characterized by H and P NMR and ESI-TOF mass spec-
trometry.
[6]CPP (47) [40]b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
XeF2 (4)
AgF (4)
TBAF (4)
P[OCH(CF3)2]3 (8)
acrylonitrile (4)
cod (4)
[6]CPP (29)
[6]CPP (44)
[6]CPP (37)
[6]CPP (25)
[6]CPP (22)
quaterphenyl (4)
Homocoupling of 1 was then attempted under Yamamoto
coupling conditions.35 Treatment of 5 mM 1a1c in THF with
[Ni(cod)2] (2.0 equiv) and dppf (2.0 equiv) at 50 °C for 1218 h
gave 2a2c in 2063% yield. A highly diluted solution of 1 and
a low temperature were required to achieve these high yields.
[
PPh (8)
3
8]- and [10]CPPs were obtained in 74 and 75% yield from 2b
a
1
Determined by H NMR using 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane as the
and 2c, respectively, using the Br -induced reductive elimination
2
b
adopted from previous studies.30 The yields were significantly
internal standard. Isolated yield.
improved by careful adjustment of the amount of added Br2 vs. 2.
In contrast, treatment of 2a with Br2 did not afford [6]CPP at
all. Careful analysis revealed that the major side products
formed were p-dibromobenzene (7) and p-dibromoterphenyl (8)
in 33 and 31% yield, respectively. The formation of 7 and 8
must be the result of undesirable CBr reductive elimination
from Pt(IV) complex 9, formed by oxidation of 2 by Br2
desired reductive CC bond coupling reaction could take place
3
9,40
when 2a was oxidized by a fluorine-based reagent.
Indeed,
treatment of 2a with XeF2 (4 equiv) at 90 °C afforded [6]CPP in
47% yield (as determined by NMR, isolated yield: 40%
(Table 1, Entry 1)). AgF was also found to be effective, giving
[6]CPP in moderate yield (Entry 2). Surprisingly, tetrabutylam-
monium fluoride (TBAF), which does not act as an oxidant but
rather is a fluorine anion source, was equally effective in
inducing the reductive elimination of 2a to give [6]CPP in 44%
3
7,38
(Figure 2).
Since CF reductive elimination requires higher activation
energy than CBr reductive elimination, we anticipated that the
Chem. Lett. 2013, 42, 621623
© 2013 The Chemical Society of Japan